- 8,998
- 2,927
Me neither. God created the entire Universe, his death would lead to its end as well and Death said he could reap him anyways. Not seeing how he couldn't do the same to 682 here.Aparajita said:
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Death (Supernatural) vs SCP-682
- Thread starter Volundox
- Start date
- 1,636
- 48
@Fate Hmmm I will need some more good input. Not to mention we didn't get to know if Death could truly killed God or not so there is that. Hence the likely 3-A part.
Edit: So that means no need to downplay SCP 682 or even Death for this matter. Also there is the fact 682 could revive as well or even regen in this fight.
Edit: So that means no need to downplay SCP 682 or even Death for this matter. Also there is the fact 682 could revive as well or even regen in this fight.
- 1,636
- 48
Well that is all I need to said now.
- 8,998
- 2,927
Yeah, but we've never seen 682 regenerating after he busted along with the Universe either as far as I know. So here we are.
I'm skeptical that SCP could come back from being killed for real by Death (Once again, his profile states he is like a Universal Constant. He could likely come back as long as the Universe in question is around, but if it goes Boom when he dies for real, I'm not believing he would still come back), too.
But anyways, I'm not arguing about anything on his profile aside from that RW and Plot Manipulation immunity. Heck, he could have immunity against a ton of powers and I wouldn't say a thing, but saying he is completely immune to these two powers is as fallacious as it gets.
I'm skeptical that SCP could come back from being killed for real by Death (Once again, his profile states he is like a Universal Constant. He could likely come back as long as the Universe in question is around, but if it goes Boom when he dies for real, I'm not believing he would still come back), too.
But anyways, I'm not arguing about anything on his profile aside from that RW and Plot Manipulation immunity. Heck, he could have immunity against a ton of powers and I wouldn't say a thing, but saying he is completely immune to these two powers is as fallacious as it gets.
- 1,636
- 48
@Fate Either say it was already stated on his profile along with his stated feats. Death can manipulation death itself, but doesn't that involve conceptual manipulation or something? Hence why you can try to use some realistic logic to it all. Also we going assume that SCP-682 will get instant killed hy Death as well which it is less likely to happen so yeah I not going simply ignore it.
- 8,998
- 2,927
Oh, and Death doesn't need proof about killing God because his scythe killed himself in a single blow. One touch and there goes the Concept of Death. Same would happen to 682.
- 1,636
- 48
@Fate How fast is that exactly? A single blow as well from a scythe. That make me wonder if 682 figure that out as well.
- 1,636
- 48
In any case @Fate, that is just one of the likely scenarios as I still not taking this lightly
- 8,998
- 2,927
Sure. If the scythe can kill the freaking concept of Death in a single blow (literally, it hits, you're dead. Not even God could kill Death yet one hit from the scythe and he was gone), what exactly is stopping it from killing the Universal Constant/the concept of 682?
- 1,636
- 48
@Fate Was Death shown to be resurrected after being killed by his own scythe? SCP 682 will react to it by dodging the scythe or telekinesis to get the scythe. Also there is the fact he could be disarmed of his own scythe as well.
- 8,998
- 2,927
Death was nearly impossible to kill and no, he didn't come back.
Also you're assuming he can only induce death by using the scythe. No. He can do it from a distance or even by snapping his fingers (Cross-Universal range...). The scythe just happens to be his weapon and it has the feat of killing him so logically it should apply to Death as well.
And at the end of the day, it doesn't matter how long it will take for Death to actually hit SCP. It will happen sooner or later as the SCP doesn't have any possible means to kill Death, while Death can kill him with one blow.
Also you're assuming he can only induce death by using the scythe. No. He can do it from a distance or even by snapping his fingers (Cross-Universal range...). The scythe just happens to be his weapon and it has the feat of killing him so logically it should apply to Death as well.
And at the end of the day, it doesn't matter how long it will take for Death to actually hit SCP. It will happen sooner or later as the SCP doesn't have any possible means to kill Death, while Death can kill him with one blow.
- 1,636
- 48
@Fate Hmmmm I see. I need refresh and Death mght be able to kill SCP 682, but will it truly put 682 down for good? That the thing I figure you will use as that could be NLF, but there is also the fact he claim he could kill God and he will never return back at all. In any case, I will not take it lightly at all.
- 8,998
- 2,927
Whatever the case, I'm voting Death for the reasons I stated above. You can always just vote Inconclusive if you're not convinced, Star.
- 1,636
- 48
@Fate There is also the fact SCP 682 can protect itself using space time anomalies and was Death shown to affect spacetime anomalies?
Edit: I already vote as inconclusive so none of these reasons are not convincing enough.
Edit: I already vote as inconclusive so none of these reasons are not convincing enough.
- 8,998
- 2,927
Killing the concept of Death which existed along with God and predates the Universe itself should be qualitatively superior to affecting spacetime anomalies.
- 1,636
- 48
@Fate Really? So saying that killing the concept of death is superior to space time anomalies wil go by what we assume it being. I not even sure on how it will work in any case as that like said it will affect all concepts like time and space for example. Not so sure on what exactly the concept of Death will involve time and space as well.
- 8,998
- 2,927
Aaand we're starting to go in circles.
If he can kill the Concept of Death out of all things and is said to be capable of killing or at least on par with God who created the Universe, I think it's safe to assume that he could affect 682. Let me put this simply. I'm not saying he necessarily can affect the concept of Space and Time by any means.
I'm saying that he can kill the being/anomaly/Universal Constant/whatever 682 is, because he can kill even his own Concept who should logically be at least on the same level of existence.
The concept of Death can't be less than a spacetime anomaly or whatever. You can't say killing the idea of the living being 682 would be a superior feat to killing the Idea of Death itself.
If he can kill the Concept of Death out of all things and is said to be capable of killing or at least on par with God who created the Universe, I think it's safe to assume that he could affect 682. Let me put this simply. I'm not saying he necessarily can affect the concept of Space and Time by any means.
I'm saying that he can kill the being/anomaly/Universal Constant/whatever 682 is, because he can kill even his own Concept who should logically be at least on the same level of existence.
The concept of Death can't be less than a spacetime anomaly or whatever. You can't say killing the idea of the living being 682 would be a superior feat to killing the Idea of Death itself.
- 8,998
- 2,927
Anyways.
I'll just agree to disagree with you on this one. Otherwise this will never end.
I'll just agree to disagree with you on this one. Otherwise this will never end.
- 1,636
- 48
@Fate If 682 is a actual living being, this will be the case yet it seems it could been between non-living and living being. A living being need food, air and even its own mind and soul to be consider a true living being.
- 8,998
- 2,927
The "living" part is Irrelevant. The concept of Death shouldn't "live"/have a life either. Still got killed.
- 1,636
- 48
@Fate I still thinking it is a draw regardless so ignoring the fact the concept of Death should live make it more convincing that life continue to exist forever if the concept of death didn't existed. Without Death, there wouldn't be Life. Without Life, there wouldn't be death.
- 1,636
- 48
That will be a paradox as well.
- 8,998
- 2,927
My friend, if I still haven't convinced you after all this, I'm positive that I could make a hundred more replies and you still wouldn't believe it. Because of that, I'll simply say:
"Sure, I'm voting Death anyways."
"Sure, I'm voting Death anyways."
- 1,636
- 48
@Fate Yeah it is not even convincing me as of now. Also one more thing so no hard feelings. I will kept my vote as it is. One can not force other people to change their views as time changes.
- 8,998
- 2,927
No worries, Star, it's just a debate. I'm not even a big fan of any of these characters. 
- 32,359
- 20,298
Death still wins.
