DB GT a very small ability addition

[Gohanblanco217]

Attack/Damage boost : Goku and Gogeta can amp their Kamehameha by 10x and Gogeta himself can amp his Big bang kamehameha by x100 as stated in their profile and I think everyone know about this so no need for further explanation.

Characters that would be affected :

• Goku
• Gogeta

Agree :

Agree :

 

[Gohanblanco217]

Bump

 

[Gilad_Hyperstar]

I'm not sure about this

Is it really 10 times and 100 times though? We kind of need proof that it actually increased by that amount and not just some talk

The kaioken multipliers got accepted because we have statements and feats describing exactly how it multiplies power

 

[Gohanblanco217]

I'm not sure about this

Is it really 10 times and 100 times though? We kind of need proof that it actually increased by that amount and not just some talk

The kaioken multipliers got accepted because we have statements and feats describing exactly how it multiplies power

I mean it's specifically stated in Goku's Profile that he can use 10x Kamehameha to beat characters who are far stronger than him

 

[Gilad_Hyperstar]

I mean it's specifically stated in Goku's Profile that he can use 10x Kamehameha to beat characters who are far stronger than him

Far stronger does not imply 10 times stronger without proof. I would like to see said proof for those claims

 

[Gohanblanco217]

Far stronger does not imply 10 times stronger without proof. I would like to see said proof for those claims

Well idk but still Goku should have Attack boost considering his 10x Kamehameha is an amped version of a regular kamehameha that is specifically used by Goku to beat people stronger than him as for the mulpliers thing idk I think we probably need more input

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

I'm not sure if this is how Damage Boosts actually works, it's just a technique that's 10x stronger than normal. Damage Boost is more so effective bonus against certain enemy types.

 

[AKM sama]

Medeus is correct.

 

[Gilad_Hyperstar]

I'm still not sure we can use the 10 and 100 times multipliers without proof of it being as such