• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Count Orlok (Nosferatu) Revision

I took the liberty of fixing up a few little pieces of coding in stats

You could bold the PnA to make it look more clean

Does Orlok really have 0 Stamina feats?

Intelligence could include Orlok's stealth capabilities

Otherwise it looks A-okau
 
Does Orlok really have 0 Stamina feats?
He never gets into fights, he just sorta goes around doing shit and then he dies
Intelligence could include Orlok's stealth capabilities
Eh, that might just be being inherently silent or even just using mindhax to keep people from realizing, it's pretty ambiguous
You could bold the PnA to make it look more clean
I think this is kind of in a grey area where neither looks better than the other but sure
 
He never gets into fights, he just sorta goes around doing shit and then he dies

Eh, that might just be being inherently silent or even just using mindhax to keep people from realizing, it's pretty ambiguous

sure
All fair!
 
Cool rework, good job
btw is there any way to calc Orlok's castle destruction?
 
Eh, could be overtime, could have been he only held it up a bit, you could calc it but I wouldn't really be sure of its validity as anything beyond a "possibly higher" personally
 
I'm gonna count this as an uncontroversial revision and apply it later today i think
 
Back
Top