continuum hypothesis.

[TiltedFN]

If a space holds another infinite space while remaining larger, would this make the larger space a higher infinity using continuum hypothesis? Lets say its a countably infinite 3D space, held in a larger space, this larger space would be uncountably infinitely larger, would this mean its spatial structure would now be significantly 4th dimensional? And if its a spacetime, this would make it 5D right? Because of the time axis.

 

[Hasty12345]

I think strictly speaking, yes (could be wrong) as the CH supposed there is no infinity between null and 1 iirc

However, on site I’m almost certain we don’t scale this way and there was a recent CRT on this very logic and it was agreed we need more evidence for this kind of jump.

 

[TiltedFN]

I think strictly speaking, yes (could be wrong) as the CH supposed there is no infinity between null and 1 iirc

However, on site I’m almost certain we don’t scale this way and there was a recent CRT on this very logic and it was agreed we need more evidence for this kind of jump.

Could you link the crt if thats actually true

 

[Hasty12345]

Bigger infinity should be uncountable infinity

Yeah time to fixed this non sense. I still not know why the standard still keep this non sense, i think about this all days but still not get why this make sense So in previous thread , we already decided that being bigger than 2A in size can possibly have higher dimensional structure, as long...

vsbattles.com

 

[TiltedFN]

I think strictly speaking, yes (could be wrong) as the CH supposed there is no infinity between null and 1 iirc

However, on site I’m almost certain we don’t scale this way and there was a recent CRT on this very logic and it was agreed we need more evidence for this kind of jump.

Judging from that crt, idk, it seems like still being bigger might be uncountably bigger, but just multipliers dont grant a higher tier alone. Idk its weird. Not even sure what the current thing is right now.