- 15,332
- 7,563
I mean, it's utterly redundant for this discussion to be a thing if it's not allowed to be added to begin with. You can do nearly anything you want in a match that isn't add-eable.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Composite Profiles
- Thread starter SomebodyData
- Start date
- 15,332
- 7,563
And if you want to have a Composite fight you make a Composite Profile that follows the guidelines, not remove canon limitations, nerfs and amps just because the fight isn't fair.
It's unfortunate that the match isn't as fair as you want it to be, yes. We should complicate and remove basically every single nerf the character has canonically received, no.
It's unfortunate that the match isn't as fair as you want it to be, yes. We should complicate and remove basically every single nerf the character has canonically received, no.
- 31,484
- 34,359
I'm personally neutral on whether or not we allow composite canons, but that's a case by case scenario. Obviously creating a composite for non-canon characters or composite that includes combining canon with non-canon is strictly forbidden. But Composite between canons can be allowed under certain circumstances. Like Composite Link is allowed because he consists of many characters who are equally important to the main series, but I'm unsure about if one character who has many different battle armors being allowed.
- 14,195
- 2,574
- Thread starter
- #46
"Preferably only make composite matches for composite profiles / tabs."
^Something like this?
^Something like this?
- 167,891
- 76,535
The instruction probably needs to be a bit more elaborate, so people understand it easier.
Then it can be placed in the Versus Thread Rules and/or Standard Battle Assumptions page, whichever is more appropriate. I am not familiar with versus matchup conditions.
Then it can be placed in the Versus Thread Rules and/or Standard Battle Assumptions page, whichever is more appropriate. I am not familiar with versus matchup conditions.
- 14,195
- 2,574
- Thread starter
- #48
Alright, how about:
Preferably only make matches with the versions of characters in their profile page, as it would otherwise lead to complicated matches that can be deemed as unfair and make composite profiles and keys redudant.
Preferably only make matches with the versions of characters in their profile page, as it would otherwise lead to complicated matches that can be deemed as unfair and make composite profiles and keys redudant.
- 167,891
- 76,535
Maybe something like this:
"Preferably avoid starting versus threads that involve composite versions of the characters that are not listed in their profile pages within this wiki, as it would otherwise lead to complicated and unreliable matches that can be deemed as unfair and make composite profiles and keys redundant."
It is just a draft though, and needs to be reworked. Kepekley might have some ideas.
"Preferably avoid starting versus threads that involve composite versions of the characters that are not listed in their profile pages within this wiki, as it would otherwise lead to complicated and unreliable matches that can be deemed as unfair and make composite profiles and keys redundant."
It is just a draft though, and needs to be reworked. Kepekley might have some ideas.
- 167,891
- 76,535
Okay.
"Preferably avoid starting versus threads that involve composite versions of the characters that are not listed in their profile pages within this wiki, as it would otherwise lead to complicated and unreliable matches that can be deemed as unfair and make composite profiles and keys redundant. If such a thread is created, make sure to not add it to either of the involved character profiles."
"Preferably avoid starting versus threads that involve composite versions of the characters that are not listed in their profile pages within this wiki, as it would otherwise lead to complicated and unreliable matches that can be deemed as unfair and make composite profiles and keys redundant. If such a thread is created, make sure to not add it to either of the involved character profiles."
- 20,729
- 3,679
Sorry to intrude, but I feel that we shouldnt discourage the usage of profile-less composite. They are harmless.
We dont discourage the use of 1-As even though they are not meant to be added 90% of the time. I think its the same in this situation, these composites should only be created for the sake of discussion and not expect them to be added.
We dont discourage the use of 1-As even though they are not meant to be added 90% of the time. I think its the same in this situation, these composites should only be created for the sake of discussion and not expect them to be added.
- 15,332
- 7,563
Uh, Ant's suggestion already has that.
- 31,484
- 34,359
While Pachi does make a good point, I personally think those kind of matches technically count more as Fun and Games matches rather than Versus threads. As for Ant's final draft, I think it looks great.
- 5,291
- 552
Actually ant's last draft dose discourages making the threads that's the first thing it says to avoid making them.Kepekley23 said:
- 5,291
- 552
I think if your considering what PaChi2 said it should look more like this.
"Do not add the results of a versus thread that involves composites of versions of the characters that are not listed in there profiles within this wiki to any profile, as they are complicated and do not paint a proper picture of the character's abilitys."
"Do not add the results of a versus thread that involves composites of versions of the characters that are not listed in there profiles within this wiki to any profile, as they are complicated and do not paint a proper picture of the character's abilitys."
- 14,195
- 2,574
- Thread starter
- #59
Nice and simple, I think Darkmon's works.
- 14,195
- 2,574
- Thread starter
- #61
They're not getting banned, just not added
- 167,891
- 76,535
Something like this perhaps?
"Avoid adding the results of versus threads that involve composite versions of the characters, that are not listed in their profile pages within this wiki, to either of the involved character profiles, as they are complicated and do not paint a proper picture of the character abilities."
"Avoid adding the results of versus threads that involve composite versions of the characters, that are not listed in their profile pages within this wiki, to either of the involved character profiles, as they are complicated and do not paint a proper picture of the character abilities."
- 14,195
- 2,574
- Thread starter
- #65
@Ant that works too
- 167,891
- 76,535
Okay. Should we add that text to the Versus Thread Rules page then?
- 14,195
- 2,574
- Thread starter
- #67
Yes, the thread seems to be concluded by now.
- 61,177
- 14,747
Speaking of rules can someone update that page so the rules about types 4, 8, and 9 being allowed now and speed amps being allowed in speed equal matches are correct?
- 61,177
- 14,747
The rules page hasn't been updated so things like types 4, 8, and 9 immortality being allowed in versus threads and speed amps being allowed in speed equalized matches isn't on there, rather the opposite is stated for both rules despite the former being agreed on for months
Similar threads
