• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Composite Godzilla vs Abomination

Status
Not open for further replies.
Christian Higdon said:
Even then, Abomination isn't one to call consistent.
They should at least.


You know.


Have a justification that is actually High 5-A
 
Godzilla vs gipsy danger said:
Godzilla wins because he destroyed Gorath, which is 6,200 denser than Earth.
that was already debunked, the small planet that he destroyed is not the same one in the same universe with the warlus Kaiju
 
Even with the lowballed Godzilla used on this site...he easily wins with superior abilities and power.

Though we could make him stronger with the tons of info missing from his pages wink wink
 
Chu Minh Duy said:
Godzilla vs gipsy danger said:
Godzilla wins because he destroyed Gorath, which is 6,200 denser than Earth.
that was already debunked, the small planet that he destroyed is not the same one in the same universe with the warlus Kaiju
"Debunked" Uh....no...no it wasn't. It's stated in the scene to be able to destroy Earth, it looks like Gorath, acts like Gorath, likely destroyed the moon as Gorath did (it isn't visible in any shot of space) and the way he obliterated it (no chunks or anything was left behind, just light and an explosion) should warrant it as true. Doing the same thing to Earth gave him dwarf star level power, let alone a clearly superior feat.
 
Yes it was debunked.

looks like gorath =/= being gorath. Not once in the entire game was it stated to be or even implied to be gorsth
 
SuperGodzilla Kaiju King said:
Chu Minh Duy said:
Godzilla vs gipsy danger said:
Godzilla wins because he destroyed Gorath, which is 6,200 denser than Earth.
that was already debunked, the small planet that he destroyed is not the same one in the same universe with the warlus Kaiju
"Debunked" Uh....no...no it wasn't. It's stated in the scene to be able to destroy Earth, it looks like Gorath, acts like Gorath, likely destroyed the moon as Gorath did (it isn't visible in any shot of space) and the way he obliterated it (no chunks or anything was left behind, just light and an explosion) should warrant it as true. Doing the same thing to Earth gave him dwarf star level power, let alone a clearly superior feat.
... Wow, we are even making up feats now.
 
WeeklyBattles said:
Yes it was debunked.
looks like gorath =/= being gorath. Not once in the entire game was it stated to be or even implied to be gorsth
Well it was still gonna destroy the planet so A) it should be a feat on Godzilla's record and B) Pachinko Godzilla should have a profile back.

Also...no...denying a feat from existing is not a debunk. Saying it never happened (which you've said) isn't the same as proving it wrong.
 
A 5A feat bare minimum seeing as there is no way it's anything but Gorath. And no Monster X's meteor is not Gorath, nor do the two correlate in size. It's pretty obvious. When both are noticed by Godzilla, one is just a red dot, the other is a massive ball of orange death despite being hundreds to thousands of miles away.
 
Prove its Gorath

'It looks like Gorath therefore it is Gorath' is not a sufficient argument

Provide any instance in the game where they say or even imply that its Gorath
 
Doesnt matter if it looks like gorath with no proof that it is gorath. By that logic Kid Goku is tier 4 because he looks like Goten
 
The planetoid-star is very large, debunking it being a simple asteroid, has a corona
Th-4
Clearly not just an asteroid and looks like no rocky or gas planet.

and what appear to be sun spots and moves. Planets and stars do not hurtle straight toward things in space, and this is far too big and by the star-like characteristics far too dense and massive to be an asteroid.


Either this is one of those massive exo-planets so large they begin acting like stars (which are 8-14 times more massive than Jupiter) or it is Gorath (a similar entity.)
Th-6
As we can see, despite the distance the object glows like a star.
 
WeeklyBattles said:
Doesnt matter if it looks like gorath with no proof that it is gorath. By that logic Kid Goku is tier 4 because he looks like Gote
Okay that's just being silly. One Goten looks like Goku since Goku was made first.

Two, Gorath is a unique object which in real life would not be able to function, limiting possibilities as to what this thing Pachinko Godzilla blew up.

Three, this is very different from the FW scene because here Godzilla outright blows the thing to bits (or rather light and gas) whereas in the film, Godzilla loses to the asteroid.
 
Yes and the pachinko machine has a fireball in the sky and Gorath came first but we're not going to scale kid Goku to Goten based solely on the fact that they look similar. Hell you can scale kid goku to GT Goku as they look the same too and they in fact are the same character.

Again, you need actual evidence that its Gorath, stop jumping through hoops and making assumptions to fit your argument.

How does that matter here exactly?
 
WeeklyBattles said:
Cool
Show me where it says its gorath

Also show me where it says it's extremely dense
I mean...what clips and images we have don't say much, showing us instead.


It MUST be super dense to be planet sized and have star-like tendencies. This is a fallacious thing to try and deny.
 
SuperGodzilla Kaiju King said:
I mean...what clips and images we have don't say much, showing us instead.


It MUST be super dense to be planet sized and have star-like tendencies. This is a fallacious thing to try and deny.
Then you have no proof that its Gorath

Please do explain how
 
Except it makes logical sense for it to be so. Toho made these scenes, the suits, the effects-all of it. So why have a normal asteroid when there is something in-universe that fits the exact description of this object which was hyped in the movies but never shown? There is no proof it's not Gorath either, since Ghidorah isn't inside it like in FW.


A planetoid needs to have a gargantuan amount of mass to begin producing fission and fusion, which results in the star-like corona. In real life the closest we have are planets dense enough to behave like brown dwarves yet still have multiple times the mass of Jupiter. This object appears to be Earth sized, yet it glows like a yellow star and not a brown dwarf. To create this level of fission the object must have the amount of gas and reactions of a star like say the Sun or possibly larger as it is glowing red and orange as well as yellow. This object looks like a mini-Sun, but for argument sake let's say it's still a solid rock. This then must be absolutely massive in mass and given size, density. To say it is an asteroid when it still glows this way even when stopped is ignorant.
 
I've presented evidence, connections to the film and real-life physics which prove this is not a meteor nor is it a normal planet. To then deny it means you must present a counter argument.


Th-4
Clearly not just an asteroid and looks like no rocky or gas planet.

It's visually clear. The object is stopped and pushed back into space but the entire time is still glowing like a star. It is clearly not on fire, it was glowing bright yellow inside of the tail which is orange. It's visually showing the object as yellow and when stoped remains that color. It's almost funny how you can't see this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top