Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually, the thread for it was with more evidenceDigimon literally get acausality type 5 because of this.
Post in thread 'Digimon Revisions: Hybrids, Darkness & some updates'Digimon literally get acausality type 5 because of this.
Where's the more evidence?Actually, the thread for it was with more evidence
It was the scans, but I starting to think it is Type 4, not type 5 for Kernel as it mentioned different laws.Where's the more evidence?
I don't see the difference between that and Chaos Force
type 5 is because kernel outright transcends the entire system
You're assuming we give type 5 Acausality for higher dimensional entitiestype 5 is because kernel outright transcends the entire system
That wasn’t even stated at all.
This is referring to Yggdrasil.
That wasn’t even stated at all.
This is referring to Yggdrasil.
Nothing as I wasn’t even involved in that thread, but regardless, we go back on topic regarding Sonic’s AscasualityCool. A higher dimensional entity. What does this have to do with the law of cause and effect?
Yep. It needs to be spoonfed.anyways what now does it need to be spoon fed that the law of causality exist and that people transcend it in order to get type 5 or what?
^I’m going to suggest putting this CRT on hold until a clear criteria is established for type 5, such as whether or not you need direct statements of causality to receive type 5. @Everything12 should make a thread pitching his proposal where other knowledgeable members on the subject can give their input.
If the consensus is that you need direct statements of causality to get type 5, then Archie won’t qualify. If not, it could still be debated on.
Ngl, I am still wondering why this needs to be mentioned. If 1-A is still affected by the causality, how did he get to the outer-verse level? He already transcends it all.Unless we are giving pretty much every God Tier who transcends time and space (Half of Tier 1) Acausality Type 5, we should just stick with actual statements of transcending causality, which is not present for the Chaos Force.
Nope. They established you need to directly mention causality to get type 5, so the Chaos Force doesn’t qualify.Now that the definition for type 5 Acausality has been reworded, do they qualify for it
So synonyms can't apply for the requirements? Or perhaps, the plot that lends to this meaning can't apply as well?Nope. They established you need to directly mention causality to get type 5, so the Chaos Force doesn’t qualify.
Note: Being completely independent of time or laws; or similar forces, does not make you completely independent of causality without the relationship between these forces and causality being clarified, with it only being considered as evidence for an irregular relationship with causality otherwise.
I guess not.So synonyms can't apply for the requirements? Or perhaps, the plot that lends to this meaning can't apply as well?
In Saint Seiya, it uses Karma to say causality. It literally means causality and there's plenty of stuff supporting that. Building a blog on it currently actually. But it's one example where a verse uses other terminology for causality.Can you give any examples of such a thing occurring?
I feel direct mention of the term is unfair. The meaning should matterIn Saint Seiya, it uses Karma to say causality. It literally means causality and there's plenty of stuff supporting that. Building a blog on it currently actually. But it's one example where a verse uses other terminology for causality.
In Saint Seiya, it uses Karma to say causality. It literally means causality and there's plenty of stuff supporting that. Building a blog on it currently actually. But it's one example where a verse uses other terminology for causality.
Edit: typing fast due to irl stuff
If there are in verse terms that reference to causality then it should be okayI feel direct mention of the term is unfair. The meaning should matter
I think I'm going to need an exampleAs long as both systems (causality and time) has something in common, yes.