• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Chainsaw Man discussion thread

Opm fans right now:
YW4uZ2lm.gif

Their manga won't be nerfed by the anime
 
As stated in the post:
Canon is not determined merely by author involvement or creative approval. It is established through explicit confirmation and direct continuity with the Canon is not determined merely by author involvement or creative approval. It is established through explicit confirmation and direct continuity with the original work. A faithful adaptation or the creator’s participation alone does not make new material canonical—only statements or actions that formally integrate the new content into the established narrative do so.
So yeah, being in the production team & author opinion (such as Oda examples in the post) are not enough, you need explicit quotes of that being part of the Manga timeline, or at least, being an discarded idea from the first release (this being along with to that specific scene instead the whole Anime)

Couldn't elaborate more since I'm at work rn
 
The Oda example was bare minimum supervision. That is not the same as Fujimotos involvement.

Movie cannonocity sounding way more prominent though
 
Yeah and none of these examples have a explicit confirmation of being part of the original continuity. Y'all should look for that, unless it's in the blog which I did not see atm.
 
Why the hell did my Alerts decide to take a vacation and made me missed all of this ?
 
Actually Chariot worked on this, right? He did say the canon blog wasn't enough
I didn't write any of it as it exists currently I did review it tho, I partook in the discussions ahead of time too, what needs to be done, and kind of why it got posted to begin with tho. And if he didn't do it, I was going to. I said I was involved, not that it's mine entirely, KT do be his own person too ya know.
No he didn't, and I doubt he actually read through the blog considering how much he was discrediting it.
Did and did.
Just because people don't agree with you doesn't mean they "didn't read it". If anything it's exactly that type of thinking that gets you stuck in a rut and causes issues on your own end if you don't take the issues at hand at face value when pointed out.
Also who said this was about CSM? Don't be presumptuous; whether or not it effects CSM is besides the point, the bigger concern is it's gotten out of hand in general and actual ground rules need to be placed to avoid extrapolation or faulty usage.
 
I assumed you did not properly read through it due to your vague and discrediting input on it. That is what I took from your sentiment, not me being upset with you because we did not come to an agreement, so do not get it confused. And regarding the premise of the thread in general, I would actually come into agreement with you based on my own beliefs that align with what was mentioned in that thread.
 
I assumed you did not properly read through it due to your vague and discrediting input on it. That is what I took from your sentiment, not me being upset with you because we did not come to an agreement, so do not get it confused. And regarding the premise of the thread in general, I would actually come into agreement with you based on my own beliefs that align with what was mentioned in that thread.
Don't assume anything, especially when I literally said I read it anyway even then?
Like think for a second, why would I derail a completely unrelated thread by systematic pruning of every single quote in a blog? You're evidently talking about the Link match right? Why in the world would I write a 100000 byte explanation for that when it ultimately wasn't topical and needed a CRT of it's own, which I said we'd do later?

You can deal with it when the time comes, don't assume people didn't read through a mixmatch of disconnected lines tho just because they didn't decide to give you a wall of text explaining why each one is suspect in a vs match of all things.
 
I like to assume, that is a preference, but I guess in this scenario I should have taken you more literally. I do not believe you would purposely derail something without proper cause. Apologies.
 
Considering the thread starter conceded that an extensive supervision is sufficient, yes it does. Also, the blog even adds further on it, it's advised to read something before discrediting it
Damn ya'll really can't go 5 seconds without yapping about people "discrediting it, they mustve not read it", as if people can just think it isn't good enough.
 
PEOPLE, I HAVE MADE A REZE MATCH!
Anybody have an interest in this, I need some debating
 
Damn ya'll really can't go 5 seconds without yapping about people "discrediting it, they mustve not read it", as if people can just think it isn't good enough.
Seeing as he was only referring to my examples in the thread and not the blog, that's a valid assumption here lol
 
And as I said, disagree with those examples meet the new requirements. Not elaborating since I'm busy.
 
I apologize for being confused, but does this imply a separation of verses into anime and manga, comics and animation, or have I misunderstood?
 
Seeing as he was only referring to my examples in the thread and not the blog, that's a valid assumption here lol
Stop assuming. Obviously people are going to read the blog if topical, but they don't need to break down EVERY blog example to comment on the examples posted in a specific context.
That shit be like pointing out a flawed calc and then acting because they didn't comment on these 30 other calcs they must not know they exist.
I apologize for being confused, but does this imply a separation of verses into anime and manga, comics and animation, or have I misunderstood?
If something has enough differences, you can make sep profiles for anything, see DBZ with Toei. That isn't a new rule fyi, the only caveat is there has to be enough different to warrant a new profile, stats being diff isn't enough, you'd need at least a few notable additions, or in some cases, removals even to justify its existence.

Edit: For example; a anime DIO profile might have enough to warrant its existence (different stats, ranges, abilities function differently like he has dust lv regen, has new abilities that are anime only like being able to turn into shadows and darkness, teleportation, etc), he has not just diff stats, but diff abilities too that are notable enough, and it's not one or two abilities either it's a handful. But someone like uh, literally every single other character in the JoJo anime, doesn't have remotely enough, they might have slightly diff stats, or maybe one extra ability, that shit isn't enough to justify a profile for Anime Jotaro for example.
 
Damb peeps, JJK got a
sub-light speed
statement now
Bad for them because it only scales to dabora and a modern day maho post adaptation, they specifcally that no human could achieve his speed and that its unprecedented in history

They also hard cap and say SoL physicals is impossible

Its actually the anti-Gojo and Sukuna Rel statement
 
Bad for them because it only scales to dabora and a modern day maho post adaptation, they specifcally that no human could achieve his speed and that its unprecedented in history

They also hard cap and say SoL physicals is impossible

Its actually the anti-Gojo and Sukuna Rel statement
I was arguing that on the general discussion, until I saw that the kanji means "near light speed". The current value for rela is 20%, which is 5x slower, so idk

Dabura without amps was also keeping up with Maho who was dodging his light CT, which would give 2 to 5% SoL, so again, idk
 
I was arguing that on the general discussion, until I saw that the kanji means "near light speed". The current value for rela is 20%, which is 5x slower, so idk

Dabura without amps was also keeping up with Maho who was dodging his light CT, which would give 2 to 5% SoL, so again, idk
Near light speed irl is anything 10% SoL or higher but moreso basically anything with a "c" so I mean any of it works but yeah basically just nukes that for Sukuna and Gojo regardless
 
Back
Top