Can we take using causality manipulation on a type 5 acausal as a feat

[Grand_Saver_Ritsuka]

If a person is shown to be able to causality hax people who transcend the concept of causality or a transdual type 4 can it be considered a valid feat?

 

[AshMcXuelan23]

for type 5 acausality, I don't know. but if the transcend of causality can still be interacted by normal people and there is someone who has a causality hax and gives effect to the person who transcends causality, someone can. like ikki in rakudai kishi

 

[theultimate5105]

Depends on the context. If it is simply effecting them with nothing else it is an Anti Feat. But if it something like applying casuality to them then haxing them it is a feat.

 

[Grand_Saver_Ritsuka]

Depends on the context. If it is simply effecting them with nothing else it is an Anti Feat. But if it something like applying casuality to them then haxing them it is a feat.

i am talking about the latter where your causality hax works on type 5 acausality

 

[theultimate5105]

i am talking about the latter where your causality hax works on type 5 acausality

Both Apply. the first is merely an Anti Feat for Type 5 while the latter is a feat for the person haxing them

 

[Makoto500]

If a person is shown to be able to causality hax people who transcend the concept of causality or a transdual type 4 can it be considered a valid feat?

WHAT, wouldn't that be contradictory?

 

[NIK_FARIS]

WHAT, wouldn't that be contradictory?

I mean even normal type Transduality should not be capable to interact with. As long as the feat in the context make sense, meaning it is not by normal person and by someone at same level of existence or approach that level, then we can treat it as feat.

 

[Makoto500]

I mean even normal type Transduality should not be capable to interact with. As long as the feat in the context make sense, meaning it is not by normal person and by someone at same level of existence or approach that level, then we can treat it as feat.

It should mean that it's either we take away their acau 5 or both are acau 5 or something like that.

But since acau 5 is supposed to be beyond causality it still seems contradictory to me though.

 

[NIK_FARIS]

It should mean that it's either we take away their acau 5 or both are acau 5 or something like that.

But since acau 5 is supposed to be beyond causality it still seems contradictory to me though.

I see your point. You could argue he had acausality negation. Like SMT protagonist

 

[Grand_Saver_Ritsuka]

I see your point. You could argue he had acausality negation. Like SMT protagonist

yogiri could also death hax someone not bound by concept of death

 

[Makoto500]

I see your point. You could argue he had acausality negation. Like SMT protagonist

Fair enough.