Calculation Group member suggestions

Jinsye · Aug 16, 2018

Antvasima · Aug 16, 2018

Okay. I will note you down for future consideration.

Arrogant_Schmuck · Aug 17, 2018

Antvasima · Aug 17, 2018

I will note you down as a candidate.

DMUA · Dec 25, 2018

Now, I'm not sure if I'm quite qualified for this (I do often make quite a few mistakes with calcs, and I am kinda not all that good with finding ways to pixel scale, and I've never anglesized), but, I think I'll at least put myself up here for consideration.

I have extreme familiarity with Calculation Instructions, as I have used a variety of said pages for various calcs, both here and on the sistersite we all know and love, FC/OC.

I have plenty of accepted calculations, though, a lot of them are recalculations (To the point I'm referred to as "The Storm God" just because I steal other people's math lol). Some of the original calcs I've done are...

I'm definitely extremely active as I'm sure anyone would tell you.

But, again, I do oft make mistakes in calcs, so, I'm not entirely sure of myself. But, I do know I sometimes do not give myself enough credit, so I'll leave this up here for others to decide.

Crimson_Azoth · Dec 25, 2018

I may not have a whole lot of weight to throw around here, but I personally recommend DMUA. He's a good dude, and is definately very intelligent and has shown impressive skill on a lot of different calculations of varying types.

He's also put togther some standard calculations that are used semi-often throughout the wiki, and steps up to the plate on some very difficult-looing calcuations. In fact, I've also seen him often offering well-reasons opinions and evaluations on other calculations, despite just being a user, and not a member of the Calc Group. See here for an example.

And, the fact that he is consistently referred to as "The Storm God" by other members of the wiki shows how widely respected his skill is. I know that my opinion doesn't mean much, but I just felt like I had to give my ten cents

Antvasima · Dec 25, 2018

I have been told in private that you once calculated a planetary storm by using the radius of the planet, which you estimated as several times larger than the sun, and that you make mistakes and could use improvement before joining the calc group, as sooner or later you risk making a rather serious mistake.

DMUA · Dec 25, 2018

Actually, i accidentally used half Circumference

And that was like... The end of October?

~~I'll be honest the way you put it is hilarious, though~~

Either way, it was a hilariously massive mishap, but a fluke and slip in judgement on my part. Though, I can't say I've calculated many other planetary storms to prove it indeed was a fluke. They're suprisingly uncommon and such.

Antvasima · Dec 25, 2018

I was paraphrasing the message that I received.

Kaltias · Dec 25, 2018

@Ant

Just going to point out, I once miscalculated a High 8-C feat and got Low 7-C results.

If you think that he needs to improve, sure, but one mistake doesn't mean much in the grand scheme of things

DMUA · Dec 25, 2018

Also for reference, you're, or, I suppose whoever told you this (definitely Bambu I'd think), is referring to this?

Yeah, it was done a few months ago and I just kinda made a massive mishap

... Though now that I know planetary storms get 6-B results, I might have to look over Storm (Marvel Comics)... My money's on KE.

Edit: Motherforker I was right on the money. Well, time for the storm good to strike again....

The_Causality · Dec 25, 2018

It's Christmas so i guess it's time to recommand a guy:

Damage3245 seem to be pretty skilled about calcs and he have also numerous accepted calcs. Thought?

Antvasima · Dec 25, 2018

Okay. I will note down both DMUA and Damage3245 as potential future suggestions.

Kepekley23 · Dec 25, 2018

I personally am not sold on either of them in the slightest as of now, going by what I've seen from their calcs.

Antvasima · Dec 25, 2018

Okay. Thank you for the input.

Kepekley23 · Dec 25, 2018

While we do need more calc group members, we should wait for people to actively gain experience and at least master some of the most often used methods. That's my opinion, at least.

The_Causality · Dec 25, 2018

also, the rule about the "3 accepted calc requirement for become a Calc group member" is pretty outdated in my opinion.

Antvasima · Dec 25, 2018

I agree with Kepekley. It is also necessary to read through and familiarise oneself with all of the calculation pages listed in the front page.

Antvasima · Dec 25, 2018

@The Causality

Well, it is more of a rough outline than an extremely strict rule.

Mr. Bambu · Dec 25, 2018

The Code is more what you call guidelines, than actual rules

M3X_2.0 · May 1, 2019

Antvasima · May 1, 2019

I suggested him in the last calc group recruitment survey, but the current members did not know him well enough at the time. I will suggest him again later.

M3X_2.0 · May 1, 2019

Thanks

Antvasima · May 1, 2019

No problem.

M3X_2.0 · May 5, 2019

Linked the calcs

Antvasima · May 6, 2019

Okay. Thanks.

Calculation Group member suggestions

Maintenance worker

Maintenance worker

Maintenance worker

Maintenance worker

Maintenance worker

Maintenance worker

Maintenance worker

Maintenance worker

Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu

Maintenance worker

Maintenance worker

Maintenance worker

Similar threads