- 19,530
- 3,924
I know I was kidding,
Also what would transcending an infinitely layed creation be?
Also what would transcending an infinitely layed creation be?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh okay good XDPsychoWarper said:I know I was kidding,
Also what would transcending an infinitely layed creation be?
Oh, that was already covered.PsychoWarper said:Cause thats a feat mentioned on the Thought Bot and The Endlesses pages.
I know, I firstly forgot all about Mister Mxy existing and the 5-D imps.PsychoWarper said:Well you just mentioned they would be downgraded to 2-B but you just said High 2-A also the Archangels and the Presence are infinitely above The Endless who have that feat.
Apparently, Marvel is next on their hit list.PsychoWarper said:Ok coolMarvel shall finally rule comics ovo
Be careful, the person is ruthless in how they take apart scans.PsychoWarper said:I mean in the last two minutes I have found two scans that mention infinite or endless dimensions.
(For Marvel)
Except for the low tiers of Marvel I thinkMatthew Schroeder said:Neither Marvel nor DC are getting downgraded. Both are very direct in having infinite dimensions.
Dude, you literally closed the thread because you couldn't argue Infinite-D DC, that's sad.Matthew Schroeder said:Neither Marvel nor DC are getting downgraded. Both are very direct in having infinite dimensions.
1. Yes, it's very very sad, you're arguments in comparison to theirs was "DC is infinite Dimensional. Accept it." Your arguments were objectively worse. You didn't even bother to cite yourself.Matthew Schroeder said:It's not sad. You literally started pushing for 2-B DC out of nowhere not long after you started claming that you were being bullied in the World of Darkness downgrades. This whole situation is very suspect and smells of spite.
Matthew, you're being objectively dishonest.Matthew Schroeder said:There's really no point in going so far into giant rants when the scans already support themselves, the author already confirmed it, and the 199,883th Dimensional snowflake is in fact called as such in the comic.
everything else is either just semantics or forcing alternate interpretations and pushing them as the only interpretations.
" | This is the shape of reality. A theoretical snowflake existing in 196,833 dimensional space. The snowflake rotates. Each element of the snowflake rotates. Each rotation describes an entirely new universe. The total number of rotations are equal to the number of atoms making up the earth. Each rotation makes a new earth. This is the Multiverse. | " |
Can't, Matthew CLOSED THE THREAD.Ultima Reality said:Both sides are being agressive to each other at the moment and derailing other threads in the process, wouldn't it be better to make a new Thread where people could calmly argue about the Tiering of the characters without throwing accusations around?
It was taken out of Context, the comic and the writer himself gives it context by saying they are parrallel Universes.Wokistan said:I don't really care that much about this, but if it's just straight up called "200k dimensional snowflake", interpreting dimensions as universes makes the phrase not really make any sense. What would that even be, a snowflake that is present in 200k universes?
The person responded to you, but Matthew Closed the thread after they responded, so no one else could responde.Ultima Reality said:Even if the snowflake itself isn't 196,883-D, it is explicitly said that there is a realm with that many dimensions in the scan. I am not sure why you all are focusing solely on the snowflake here
" | I used a lot of this M-Theory, brane multiverse stuff in Final Crisis. Doug Mahnke did a great 3-D drawing of an inter-brane corridor in the Superman Beyond segments ― and it ties in fine with how I see things operating on 'recursive,'isomorphic scales, or dimensions. I'm ready to accept that our entire lives are playing out across a 2-D film as thin as soap bubble skin, since ― as above, so below ― we already have our own examples of such branes in the form of movie and TV screens, the pages of books and of comics. | " |
~ Grant Morrison |
Um, no, Most did not agree with you, at all.Matthew Schroeder said:Can you stop using caps lock and being so childish? I closed the thread because it wouldn't go anywhere, most had and do agree with me, and the other side was being provocative and confrontational.
Just like you are being right now.
If you continue I'll have to report you for it.
I wonder why the issue had to be taken to another thread... Oh right, because you closed the thread where everyone was talking about it, maybe instead of closing the thread, you could have tried to argue instead of saying "Accept it".Matthew Schroeder said:It's not childish, I gave you the reason why the thread is closed.
Childish is carrying the issue on every single thread and being as needlessly confrontational as necessary, and actively mocking the other side with statements like "OH, THE IRONY", "Give me a break", "What a sad joke".
The thread wasn't closed purely for disagreements. It was closed because the intentions were obvious.