Boosting MHA speed via another laser feat?

[DaReaperMan]

By the way, I could turn into the count from Sesame Street and count the anti-feats to SoL MHA at these tiers, just from the calculated ones. In fact, I'll do just that!

One Anti-feat! Ah ah ah!

Two Anti-feats! Ah ah ah!

Three Anti-feats! Ah ah ah!

Four Anti-feats! Ah ah ah!

Five Anti-feats! Ah ah ah!

Six Anti-feats! Ah ah ah!

Seven Anti-feats! Ah ah ah!

Eight! Eight Anti-feats! Ah ah ah!

 

[KashinKojiiiiii]

By the way, I could turn into the count from Sesame Street and count the anti-feats to SoL MHA at these tiers, just from the calculated ones. In fact, I'll do just that!

One Anti-feat! Ah ah ah!

Two Anti-feats! Ah ah ah!

Three Anti-feats! Ah ah ah!

Four Anti-feats! Ah ah ah!

Five Anti-feats! Ah ah ah!

Six Anti-feats! Ah ah ah!

Seven Anti-feats! Ah ah ah!

Eight! Eight Anti-feats! Ah ah ah!

One! great big debunk! Ah ah ah!
If aoyama beam was always Sub Rel that means all of the basis for your calcs are flawed buddy nice try

 

[Damage3245]

One! great big debunk! Ah ah ah!
If aoyama beam was always Sub Rel that means all of the basis for your calcs are flawed buddy nice try

Why would Aoyama's beam be Sub Rel?

 

[DaReaperMan]

One! great big debunk! Ah ah ah!
If aoyama beam was always Sub Rel that means all of the basis for your calcs are flawed buddy nice try

So you choose masturbation over accepting it being an outlier. Dense Stonewaller. The mods aren't going to listen to this kind of charade from a stonewaller, you'd literally have to find like 8 more LS speeds for low to bottom-tier MHA to actually do anything here.

 

[KashinKojiiiiii]

So you choose masturbation over accepting it being and outlier. Dense Stonewaller. The mods aren't going to listen to this kind of charade from a stonewaller, you'd literally have to find like 8 more LS speeds for low to bottom-tier MHA to actually do anything here.

Everytime aoyama shoots a beam it’s a ls feat brodie sorry. We’re well past 8 and that’s me being respectful also do you have any rebuttal for Shigaraki being comparable to his radio waves attack speed? I’ve sent scans and I’ll send a link to the thread of me proving that also I really wanna see what you have to say lmaoo

 

[FanSyst]

I don't think it is necessary to discuss how ridiculously incoherent this would be if the speed of light is considered.

 

[KashinKojiiiiii]

Why would Aoyama's beam be Sub Rel?

Messed up my fault. I mean LS I was saying sub Rel referring to Mina ashido aim dodging at very close ranges. It has to be at least higher than what she has now

 

[DaReaperMan]

Everytime aoyama shoots a beam it’s a ls feat brodie sorry. We’re well past 8 and that’s me being respectful also do you have any rebuttal for Shigaraki being comparable to his radio waves attack speed? I’ve sent scans and I’ll send a link to the thread of me proving that also I really wanna see what you have to say lmaoo

BUZZER NOISE wrong, try again.

 

[KashinKojiiiiii]

BUZZER NOISE wrong, try again.

Mhmm Aoyama beam = LS. Light reflecting off mirrors babyyy you love to see it

 

[FanSyst]

One! great big debunk! Ah ah ah!
If aoyama beam was always Sub Rel that means all of the basis for your calcs are flawed buddy nice try

 

[QuasiYuri]

By the way, I could turn into the count from Sesame Street and count the anti-feats to SoL MHA at these tiers, just from the calculated ones. In fact, I'll do just that!

One Anti-feat! Ah ah ah!

Two Anti-feats! Ah ah ah!

Three Anti-feats! Ah ah ah!

Four Anti-feats! Ah ah ah!

Five Anti-feats! Ah ah ah!

Six Anti-feats! Ah ah ah!

Seven Anti-feats! Ah ah ah!

Eight! Eight Anti-feats! Ah ah ah!

This anti-feats fest work for like, 90% of our LS and above verses.

 

[KashinKojiiiiii]

You’ve seen Shigaraki scale to his radio waves speed? I wanna see your take on it also ima send the link for that thread. He’s at least mhs scaling off that

 

[Damage3245]

Well, I think it should be fairly obvious to everyone here that this has been rejected.

You need way more consistent evidence for an upgrade of this magnitude. Since this thread is basically just a repeat of CRT's that have come before it, I'll be closing it now until new evidence actually comes up.