• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Big Speed Revisions

Status
Not open for further replies.
Modifying it in what manner?
 
It is argued that moving in absence of time is above moving infinite distance in finite time. If this is accurate, the distinction could be mentioned in the definition of infinite speed. If it is accurate, once again.
 
Well, we would need considerable input from knowledgeable staff members first.
 
TestAcer said:
X > 0

K > (aleph_0)

(aleph_0) / X = (aleph_0)

X / 0 = K
=> X = K*0 => X*0 = K*0*0 <=> X*0 = K * (0*0) <=> X*0 = K*0 => 0=X*0 = X for X > 0. So all finite numbers are equal to 0. Nice. With that follows (aleph_0)/X = (aleph_0) <=> (aleph_0)/0=(aleph_0). Assuming (aleph_0)/0  X/0, for monotonicity reasons, we get K  (aleph_0)/0 = (aleph_0) < K => K < K

So not only is K not greater than (aleph_0), but it is also smaller than itself.

...

Fun aside, I am currently at uni and have work later. But I'm going to have a more serious look at this once I have time.
 
Okay. Thank you for the help.
 
So as I already demonstrated in my prior comment the mathematical part of the argumentation certainly doesn't hold.

For the general case the question is: Why is moving in a timeless void even considered a feat for infinite (read: more than finite) speed?

For example in cases such a Gold Experience Requiem I would argue that it is, because King Crimson erases the time between events A and B, making it so that they are instantly after each other. Meaning moving in this erased time (between event A and B) is performing movement between two instants.

In this case we can reason infinite speed as a simple limes process. That is to say, we conclude that for any finite speed the timeframe for said movement would take a longer timeframe, hence the speed has to be infinite.

But limes to infinite are all the same. Moving infinite distance in finite time is also a limes process and so is moving infinite distance in 0 time.

So all those things are the same speed. Hence infinite speed doesn't need separate levels, as it's all the same speed.
 
I agree that making a new Tier speed between infinite and immeasurable seems really wonky and unnecessary. And DonTalk makes sense as usual.
 
If necessary, it could just be clarified on the Speed page under Note 4 that moving infinite distance in finite time would qualify as infinite speed. But this is just my suggestion so feel free to take it with a grain of salt.

"Note 4:

Characters who showcase the ability to move freely and naturally in a timeless void may or may not qualify for an infinite speed rating.

For specific information, see our Timeless Voids Standards explanation page.

Additionally, characters who can travel an infinite distance in a finite period of time would qualify for infinite speed. The formula for speed is Speed = D/T, if the value of "D" is infinite, the distance travelled would equal infinity. Infinity divided by any finite value of "T", the amount of time that passes, would still remain infinity, thus the character must have at some point moved instanteously, as this cannot be achieved with finite speeds."
 
Wouldn't this be better?

"Able to move indefinitely while time literally stands still, travel anywhere instantly or move an infinite distance within a finite amount of time"
 
@Andytrenom

I suppose that wording works as well.
 
Yea, looks good.

Anything else left to discuss here?
 
@Ant Is it okay if I make my minor adjustments to the infinite speed description?
 
I think the Timeless Void(s?) Standards are fine.
 
Okay. Thanks for the reply.

Should we close this thread then?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top