- 20,621
- 17,627
Because even if taken at face value and ignoring every onscreen visual issue, it would be an outlier for everyone involved and makes every subsequent event in every film questionable.Why was it rejected?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because even if taken at face value and ignoring every onscreen visual issue, it would be an outlier for everyone involved and makes every subsequent event in every film questionable.Why was it rejected?
how does it make it questionble? when has thor gained on using black hole creation that can suck in stars when it would destroy earth in procces.Because even if taken at face value and ignoring every onscreen visual issue, it would be an outlier for everyone involved and makes every subsequent event in every film questionable.
Ive explained how this isn't questionable as he haven't gotten a use for it and being a outlier dosen't sense as The Bifrost uses a powerful, rainbow-like energy drawn/ from the center of Asgard to create wormhole-like portals that can instantaneously transport people and objects between realms, over millions of light-years of distance. This means that it can be used to create wormholes that can suck in stars like it did in thor aswell and stormbreaker controls it meaning thor can control star sucking power at very leastBecause even if taken at face value and ignoring every onscreen visual issue, it would be an outlier for everyone involved and makes every subsequent event in every film questionable.
That was just one of many things i brought up. The bifrost bridge tanking a explosion from a ship that can warp stars should easly scale it higher than current tier not to mention the fact that celestials are refferd as "gods" and gorr being able to kill every "god" and zeus being above every god should mean that gorr,zeus and thor can be scaled to celestialsWhat progress has this CRT made? I've seen many times that people have tried to upgrade yggdrasil to 3-A, which has never succeeded
I don't think so because from looks of the battle, if it's a celestial level it should be able to do more than what we seeThat was just one of many things i brought up. The bifrost bridge tanking a explosion from a ship that can warp stars should easly scale it higher than current tier not to mention the fact that celestials are refferd as "gods" and gorr being able to kill every "god" and zeus being above every god should mean that gorr,zeus and thor can be scaled to celestials
Does how we see their battle really downscale in this case? Because Thor did shatter the enitre moon that they were on not to mention that gorr was able to resist the bifrost which still has capabilites to suck in stars and tank the explosion from a ship powerd by a star warping engine.I don't think so because from looks of the battle, if it's a celestial level it should be able to do more than what we see
That's nothing compared to celestials. They created galaxy and sun. and can create black holes by simply teleportDoes how we see their battle really downscale in this case? Because Thor did shatter the enitre moon that they were on not to mention that gorr was able to resist the bifrost which still has capabilites to suck in stars and tank the explosion from a ship powerd by a star warping engine.
Ok? Zeus is already scaled to khonshu who moved the stars yet we don't see him doing the same.That's nothing compared to celestials. They created galaxy and sun. and can create black holes by simply teleport
Also the star sucking feat/black hole creation makes more sense when thor and gorr can be compared to celestiasl.That's nothing compared to celestials. They created galaxy and sun. and can create black holes by simply teleport
I valuated the thread and changed it can you take a look at the things i added?Because even if taken at face value and ignoring every onscreen visual issue, it would be an outlier for everyone involved and makes every subsequent event in every film questionable.