Are we use String for higher dimension?

[Fixxed]

So string is one dimensional object and it size is about 10^−35 meter planck length

My question is are we use 10^-35 meter planck as one dimensional??
Is structure that view 4D structure as about that size can have higher structure??
And what about view 4D structure as infinitely small??

 

[Alexander]

I think we don't use string theory,because of that problem.

 

[Thelastmlg]

we used to use it for tier 1 several years ago, like 5 i think, we stopped doing so once we started getting more strict with tier 1

 

[Fixxed]

we used to use it for tier 1 several years ago, like 5 i think, we stopped doing so once we started getting more strict with tier 1

Are we still use it for only higher dimensional existence??

 

[Thelastmlg]

That i am not sure, don't so though since IIRC HDE requires the dimensions to at least be bigger/superior to lower ones, even without qualifying for tier 1.

But i think i have seen a profile with string theory for HDE

 

[Ottavio_Merluzzo]

HDE is all about having more axis of movement/spatial dimensions.

It doesn't have anything to do with tiering afaik.

 

[Fixxed]

Bump

 

[Fixxed]

HDE is all about having more axis of movement/spatial dimensions.

It doesn't have anything to do with tiering afaik.

So are we consider something that has size of 10^-35 meter planck as HDE??? And have more axis of movement

What about infinitely small, it have HDE to??

 

[SeijiSetto]

So are we consider something that has size of 10^-35 meter planck as HDE??? And have more axis of movement

What about infinitely small, it have HDE to??

No. To get HDE you need to be able to move in more than 3 axes, that's it.

 

[Reiner04]

String dimensions can get u hde, not high tiers tho.

 

[Qawsedf234]

So are we consider something that has size of 10^-35 meter planck as HDE??? And have more axis of movement

What about infinitely small, it have HDE to??

HDE just means you posses different axis used for movement or to be fully definined you require more than just the standard three vectors (X/Y/Z). The tiering dimensions are based on actual geometric dimensions, as in a 2-Dimensional Plane, 3-Dimensional Cube or 4-Dimensional Tesseract. String dimensions wouldn't qualify for any higher AP rating.

 

[Fixxed]

HDE just means you posses different axis used for movement or to be fully definined you require more than just the standard three vectors (X/Y/Z). The tiering dimensions are based on actual geometric dimensions, as in a 2-Dimensional Plane, 3-Dimensional Cube or 4-Dimensional Tesseract. String dimensions wouldn't qualify for any higher AP rating.

I mean in string theory it can have higher D by just curled up in the size of 23 times plack length (10^-33 cm), can we give HDE to verse that have that planck size?? What about verse that have size of infinitely small, is we give them infinite D of HDE???

 

[Guardian_Doge]

I mean in string theory it can have higher D by just curled up in the size of 23 times plack length (10^-33 cm), can we give HDE to verse that have that planck size?? What about verse that have size of infinitely small, is we give them infinite D of HDE???

Because they are compactified to the degree of quantum foam, they're just very small microtubes that vibrate, they would not add additional axes in the macro-physical sense, they are more like "frequencies" that can accommodate to certain particles.

 

[Reiner04]

I mean in string theory it can have higher D by just curled up in the size of 23 times plack length (10^-33 cm), can we give HDE to verse that have that planck size?? What about verse that have size of infinitely small, is we give them infinite D of HDE???

Yeah, just because higher dimensions are infinitely small doesn't mean extra-axis don't exist. It does. So yam.

 

[Fixxed]

Because they are compactified to the degree of quantum foam, they're just very small microtubes that vibrate, they would not add additional axes in the macro-physical sense, they are more like "frequencies" that can accommodate to certain particles.

That not what i mean. I mean is we give something in that size a additional dimensional??? If yes. What about it have infinitely small size are we give additional infinite more dimensional

Yeah, just because higher dimensions are infinitely small doesn't mean extra-axis don't exist. It does. So yam.

^