- 25,631
- 15,977
I’m just curious if anyone agrees with what they say regarding our choice in making the downstreamers tier 0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I can’t seem to see where they said what they saidI’m just curious if anyone agrees with what they say regarding our choice in making the downstreamers tier 0
I can’t seem to see where they said what they said
The 'argument' literally only comes from scaling to A Journey to Amasia in Obelisk, a series of short stories set in the Proxima universe that has absolutely zero relation to the Manifold series. It is on the same level as them using Kull to scale the Cthulhu Mythos cosmology to High 1-A and eventually Tier 0. It's stretching shit to the extreme at best, outright disingenuous at worst.I suggest we don´t get emotional about this and recognize the VSBW argument is strong.
This isn't very impressive when you're aware that Tegmark's Type IV only contains all of the structures within computer programs and that it has a high upper bound due to being inconsistent with Godel's incompleteness theorem, which Tegmark himself recognized. It's why his ultimate ensemble can be drastically shrunk and an upper limit placed on its supposed complexity: if only "Godel-complete" (fully-decidable) mathematical structures can be said to have "physical existence" then the Level IV does not contain every structure that exists.The manifold is a type IV Tegmark multiverse
Not the guy you replied to, but I can pretty much tell you, why their current rating of the Downstreamers is bullshit.Can you plz spend some time to downgrade the thing then. Make CRT on their forums.
I am just reading the manifold series so I can’t say much, let’s wait for the supporters
If the short stories are not related to Manifold then Woodin stuff for tier 0 is invalid even with our standardwe just have different standards from them
Based?one word response
Doesn't elaborate
Leaves
I really really don't see the point of posts like this - no offense, Pokémonfan. It just seems like it will lead to bashing of other communities for no reasons and call each other dumb. We had quite a few before, some about Reddit communities, other about tiktok and more. And quite a few of them got very heated and toxic for no reasons.
Maybe they are correct, maybe they aren't, we just have different standards from them. Everyone got their own ways of scaling things, I know I do, and I am sure you do too. These standards don't have to agree with one another, but that, on its own, is what makes battleboarding quite fun. Different interpretations and all.
There is CUH and MUH, the two have heavy differences when it comes to cosmology:This isn't very impressive when you're aware that Tegmark's Type IV only contains all of the structures within computer programs
There is CUH and MUH, the two have heavy differences when it comes to cosmology:
CUH: computable universe hypothesis (CUH), which says that the mathematical structure that is our external physical reality is defined by computable functions.
MUH: Our external physical reality is a mathematical structure.[3] That is, the physical universe is not merely described by mathematics, but is mathematics (specifically, a mathematical structure). Mathematical existence equals physical existence, and all structures that exist mathematically exist physically as well. Observers, including humans, are "self-aware substructures (SASs)". In any mathematical structure complex enough to contain such substructures, they "will subjectively perceive themselves as existing in a physically 'real' world".[4]
You are referring to CUH type IV multiverse which Manifold is not. It is a MUH type IV multiverse, unlike CUH which is described as an "augmentation" from MUH on wikipedia
Honestly, i do not believe Journey to Amasia is part of the Manifoldverse, as in phase space, Baxter directly links which books are part of manifoldverse, and that Journey to Amasia was listed under Proxima rather than Manifold. However, if you take the extremely vague statement of:If the short stories are not related to Manifold then Woodin stuff for tier 0 is invalid even with our standard
It's alr. Technically they were half right, but they got rid of all the nuance in favour of downscaling.I didn’t say that and I have no idea what the stuff means (I prefer to stay away from this stuff)
that was just a quote I copied from tirnanogsong
the books ive read are god awful (minus Manifold : Time, i ****** loved it), and the verse itself is very mathy and complicated. Malenfant's pretty cool, but not even he's worth taking a deep dive into this verse.Honestly after seeing all this.
i think it’s best for me to stay away from this kind of stuff
the books ive read are god awful (minus Manifold : Time, i ****** loved it), and the verse itself is very mathy and complicated. Malenfant's pretty cool, but not even he's worth taking a deep dive into this verse.
Honestly im a hard supporter of the "why on earth did we make 1-A and above so complicated" group, but its the future we live in now and i doubt it'll change anytime soon.agree but i meant anything having to do with dimensional tiering and aleph, woodin, or any cardinal related stuff.
that will really mess up your brain if you try to understand it (except if your smart as mathematician or close to that)
I really really don't see the point of posts like this - no offense, Pokémonfan. It just seems like it will lead to bashing of other communities for no reasons and call each other dumb. We had quite a few before, some about Reddit communities, other about tiktok and more. And quite a few of them got very heated and toxic for no reasons.
Maybe they are correct, maybe they aren't, we just have different standards from them. Everyone got their own ways of scaling things, I know I do, and I am sure you do too. These standards don't have to agree with one another, but that, on its own, is what makes battleboarding quite fun. Different interpretations and all.