• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Anos vs Baal

Hi so I heard we're trying to treat Anos's logic stuff as separate from Law Manipulation. Uh, no, we don't do that here. I specifically made a thread that got accepted to kill that notion. Manipulating logical truths and stuff falls under Law Manipulation on the site and people trying to make it separate so it can be this unresistable ability in VS matches isn't gonna fly
mfw it's still on other profiles aside from the sword's 💔

(there was nobody making it separate beforehand in an untruthful way)
 
mfw it's still on other profiles aside from the sword's 💔

(there was nobody making it separate beforehand in an untruthful way)
I do plan to get to those once I decide to get off my ass, but I do remember what you're talking about (I assume you mean other verses)

Also yes people desperately wanted it to stay as is so it could be this unique thing that nobody on the site can resist, it was very obvious with the way it was used, despite logic stuff already being under the Law Manip umbrella
 
No, because the other aspects are manipulated through the law manip,
No it wouldn't because the means said law manip effects things are on a completely different framework and effect other things that AREN'T encompassed from said resistance.
Baal resists Anos or Venuzdonoa's attempts at manipulating the laws (logic if you want to nitpick) of his existence, and thus he can't even get to use the math manip part
Again baals resistence to law hax doesn't encompass the same level of existence venuzdonoa does making said resistance irrelevant
It is by definition and indexing, law hax (with other stuff stapled on), it being superordinate to normal law hax does not change that it is still law hax
It does because it literally means said other abilities would also have to be answered in some capacity
 
Hi so I heard we're trying to treat Anos's logic stuff as separate from Law Manipulation. Uh, no, we don't do that here. I specifically made a thread that got accepted to kill that notion. Manipulating logical truths and stuff falls under Law Manipulation on the site and people trying to make it separate so it can be this unresistable ability in VS matches isn't gonna fly
That's not the argument they're just strawmaning
 
Also yes people desperately wanted it to stay as is so it could be this unique thing that nobody on the site can resist, it was very obvious with the way it was used, despite logic stuff already being under the Law Manip umbrella
The most it was there for (and for other profiles/verses I assume) was the fact it was just there to be there or recognized I GUESS (the lack of acknowledgement about it aside from how it's functions -convos not even talking about the logic manip in the profile but its in verse function- leads to that idea anyways), + it lead over to law manip anyways

If there was an example for it I'd love to see it because I VERY much wonder, I haven't seen anything
 
I'll say this again the argument is that logic in misfit goes beyond standard law hax by encompassing other abilities beyond just manipulating principals

Said hax allows them to manipulate things like concepts, fate, mathmatics, and so on

while resisting law hax would grant resistance to for fate manip that works through said hax things like mathmatics manip work on something beyond the level of existence that resisting conceptual principals are

as a result you would need to resist those in some capacity since they don't just exist as mere extensions but extensions with an entirely different form of existence to them.

it would be like saying x can resist EE therefore resists conceptual EE it doesn't work that way even on the wiki

THIS is my argument
 
Last edited:
I'll say this again the argument is that logic in misfit goes beyond standard law hax by encompassing other abilities beyond just manipulating principals
I mean I think that's kinda covered as is with the abilities on Venuzdonoa's profile but on the site, if it's not in the profile it's not usable. So if you try to say that Venuzdonoa's Law Manipulation comes from logic stuff and that logic is different and thus resisting Law Manip doesn't matter, you'd be wrong (by our standards anyway)
 
I mean I think that's kinda covered as is with the abilities on Venuzdonoa's profile but on the site, if it's not in the profile it's not usable. So if you try to say that Venuzdonoa's Law Manipulation comes from logic stuff and that logic is different and thus resisting Law Manip doesn't matter, you'd be wrong (by our standards anyway)
? mathmatics manip is on the profile tho
 
The most it was there for (and for other profiles/verses I assume) was the fact it was just there to be there or recognized I GUESS (the lack of acknowledgement about it aside from how it's functions -convos not even talking about the logic manip in the profile but its in verse function- leads to that idea anyways), + it lead over to law manip anyways

If there was an example for it I'd love to see it because I VERY much wonder, I haven't seen anything
Maybe I'll like go digging again because I remember seeing something like that was what caused me to want to make my thread but it was basically like "this isn't Law Manip, it's Logic Manip, so the resistance to Law Manip doesn't mean anything"

So by that line of reasoning we basically had an ability that wasn't actually documented as an ability and nobody resisted because maintaining the agenda was the top priority
 
It has differences in terms of effects, but it doesn't in terms of cause, which is my point.
Thats irrelevant since the effect in question is whats gonna well...effecting him???
No idea whats the reason for Naruto resisting EE, the profile doesnt seem to explain well. If its just generic EE instead of a power's byproduct then yes, he wouldnt resist. But if he had resistance to causality manip, he would resist it, since Kumagawa's EE happens because of his causality manip. His causality manip being able to affect concepts doesnt suddenly makes his causality hax harder to resist if the opponent already resists causality manipulation.
No, kumagawas EE evolved beyond casuality manip to a completely different ability

100 gauntlets is an ability that manipulates casuality

All fiction (the evolved form) just turns it and other stuff to nothing

they arent the same
Likewise, if a character could perform causality manip because of their EE, resisting EE would make you avoid the causality hax.
It would because they both effect things on the same lvl (physical with some elements of space and time)
They have varying applications but the source is still the same, as the idea is still [manipulating the law of something] for whatever application to happen. Resisting the former ("manipulating the law") would turn the latter ("of something") inapplicable as there would be no cause for the effect to happen to begin with.
Again if said things are completely different in existence the cause becomes irrelevant

As I said before this basic only works because the cause and effect have the same level of existence

manipulating the laws of time and space is limited to the restrictions of time and space

manipulating the laws of math goes beyond time and space focusing on variables that encompass stuff like that
 
I think the worst part is that Anos has survived this but I don't think it's listed in the profile anywhere 😭

But if it works like how I think then Anos can jjst use Kurst to put himself back though not like it'd stop him less Baal decides to just go all the way rather than stop when he's a kid (he fights even as a child anyways both in his past and the present)
 
You're just naming the absolute extremes when I'm pretty sure Anos just -survives it- if not just fight as he is when probably turned into a kid (that is if Baal doesn't go all the way anyways + Baal in all his abilities cannot kill anos)
baal has power null on his profile i'm pretty sure so i don't think anos would be able to go back the same way.

also baals stuff for whatever reason has like 16 layers for everything so I kinda have to use the extremes here
 
Thats irrelevant since the effect in question is whats gonna well...effecting him???
It's relevant since there would be no effect happening to begin with if the cause is resisted.
No, kumagawas EE evolved beyond casuality manip to a completely different ability

100 gauntlets is an ability that manipulates casuality

All fiction (the evolved form) just turns it and other stuff to nothing

they arent the same
His EE is directly listed within the applications of his causality manipulation in the profile.
manipulating the laws of math goes beyond time and space focusing on variables that encompass stuff like that
Not sure what you are trying to say with "levels of existence" here but we dont assume math manip to be a higher/better form of space-time manip nor something better than it by default. Likewise, we dont assume manipulation of laws of math as being better than the manipulation of laws of reality or causality or anything like that by default.
 
It's relevant since there would be no effect happening to begin with if the cause is resisted.
yes it would since resistances guard against effects not causes
His EE is directly listed within the applications of his causality manipulation in the profile.
The literal first sentence for all fiction is and I quote " His minus ability allows him to deny any aspect of reality"
Not sure what you are trying to say with "levels of existence"
I'm talking about different forms of existence for example physical things, spiritual things, imaginary things and so on
here but we dont assume math manip to be a higher/better form of space-time manip nor something better than it by default.
However we do for things like EE and so on
Likewise, we dont assume manipulation of laws of math as being better than the manipulation of laws of reality or causality or anything like that by default.
Yes we do, vsb literally acknowledges that because of the nature of mathmatics manip things like probability manip can be seen as a possible application since probability can be described in the form of a variable
 
Baal has layers, Anos doesn't, bro can do nothing apparently 💔
I would've assumed Venuzdonoa could adapt to Baal or just his chaotic eyes destroying everything I guess—?

But I don't know if the first one would work even and the second.. idk why layers be protecting against that much of a gap but that's how it goes I guess-.
 
i thought Venuzdonoa passively nukes Baal on a 2-A level or something
thats what everyone says
has to summon it first and (I was told off-site) that apparently baal can resist somehow cause resistance layers > 2-A potency because both still operate on a 4-D scale but idk if it works like that entirely here, maybe i'm just explaining it wrong

edit: if chaotic eyes or venuz doesn't work somehow then I'm staying voting for incon, oblivion has the answers
 
It's the same as attack potency bypassing layers normally. Just because they're 2A doesn't mean they can nuke someone's already 4D resistance to hax. Even moreso now because smurf hax got gutted, that stuff now also becomes layers.

Of course if your verse treats higher levels into 2A as more hax potency/layers, then there's an arguement. But yeah I guess baal resists everything anos does here. That said, surprised anos has none, or at least not many given how many times I've seen infinite layers thrown around lol
 
yes it would since resistances guard against effects not causes
From my experience in the site, they can guard against both but the latter ends up not mattering if you resist the former.
The literal first sentence for all fiction is and I quote " His minus ability allows him to deny any aspect of reality"
It doesnt matter. His P&A directly says that All Fiction is causality manip and that EE is a result of it. If you think thats wrong make a CRT to change his P&A.
Yes we do, vsb literally acknowledges that because of the nature of mathmatics manip things like probability manip can be seen as a possible application since probability can be described in the form of a variable
A power having applications doesnt mean it's "more fundamental" than those applications, if thats what you are trying to say. I haven't seen any thread where that has been the case. Plus, we have no written standard nor any apparent precedent regarding "more fundamental law hax means you cant conventionally resist it even if you resist general law hax". Like I said, what matters right now in this case, and what we do have written down in the standards, are layers and smurf hax, which Anos has none of.
 
Last edited:
why incon tho
the wincon for Baal is that he puts Anos in a time loop for as long as he wants which counts as incap
Baal could also BFR him to another time period. Surprisingly, Anos doesn't have proper time travel in the profile.
 
Back
Top