- 11,099
- 4,323
I have been told by in Real World profiles, we can get kinetic energy from speed no matter what, since this is the real world and physics work as in the real world. So I think this should be stated in the Kinetic Energy Feats.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
An exception for Kinetic Energy Feats
- Thread starter Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan
- Start date
-
- Tags
- kinetic energy feats
- 7,228
- 2,206
That's a bit vague, wym?
- 11,099
- 4,323
- Thread starter
- #4
For real world profiles, we can get speed from kinetic energy and kinetic energy from speed no matter what. It should be noted on the page.
- 11,099
- 4,323
- Thread starter
- #6
Late bump
- 8,438
- 3,293
I mean that makes sense. Physics works here 100% of the time.
- 11,099
- 4,323
- Thread starter
- #8
Can this be added then? It's not that controversial, and real life profiles are already doing that.
- 11,099
- 4,323
- Thread starter
- #9
bump
- 11,099
- 4,323
- Thread starter
- #10
bump
- 11,099
- 4,323
- Thread starter
- #11
bump
- 11,099
- 4,323
- Thread starter
- #13
bump
- 11,099
- 4,323
- Thread starter
- #16
@Kaltias can you unlock the page then?
- 11,099
- 4,323
- Thread starter
- #18
Done
- 12,239
- 1,112
Would that not be calculation stacking? .
- 11,099
- 4,323
- Thread starter
- #20
No.
- 19,123
- 6,335
Calc stacking is not mathematically incorrect. It's simply that applying it to fiction leads to wrong results (like anyone who can throw a 7-B punch having relativistic speed).
That problem doesn't exist irl because the real word follows the laws of physic 100% of the time
That problem doesn't exist irl because the real word follows the laws of physic 100% of the time
- 11,099
- 4,323
- Thread starter
- #22
Depends on what type of calc stacking though. For this case, Kaltias is right.
