-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Akuto Sai Downgrade
- Thread starter LuciferX
- Start date
- Status
- 1,528
- 855
Bro why answer that question, did you read to dkd? A person who collects and throws away the articles he sees randomly without reading the series has no right to say that dkd fans
- 1,528
- 855
Talking about the series with someone who hasn't read it is a complete headache because it comes up with nonsense completely out of context, just like the debunk written on comic vine, and it's really hard to explain to that person because they haven't read it, especially if that person doesn't want to understand.
- 545
- 130
- 2,134
- 2,421
Wrong. I posted the real context of the questions asked.
What he means is that the infinite r>f layers were transcended by Akuto simply because that's how things work. Only time he did, was with void body. Only logical explanation to that is that void body can trancend infinite r>f layers and bring Akuto to TLOIs level.
Nice try though, but having bad interpretations on your part means nothing lol
Jorosai77
He/Him- 58
- 17
Tbh it does feel the same with a bit of changes
- 2,134
- 2,421
You're literally going against what author said. I posted the full question and author answers. This isn't the only time you only post answers and leave out the questions. So you're ignoring author isn't my problem.
Nothing I said was made up. I explained it clear enough. Maybe read again a couple dozen times.
Wrong, I did debunk you. You're literally going in circles saying I'm wrong yet you don't even post the questions author answered, and if you do, you twist his words.
- 1,528
- 855
But that is true ı explain this who someone has read to daimou and ı explain who someone hasn't read to dkd and clearly difficult explain because you don't understand any think and You keep throwing things out of context before us. we say, what can we do that it does not express it in the context, you repeat what you say without caring because you do not know the context, and this is seriously tiring my friend.
- 2,134
- 2,421
Anyway, I asked DontTalkDT to check out this thread. Once he gives his opinion on things we can call staff to evaluate this CRT. I have school work to do so cya later.
- 1,528
- 855
I explain that argumant and you dont understand and you repeat again and again same word same sentence.No matter how I explain it, someone who doesn't read dkd and does their best to lower it will ignore and continue to repeat the same things, and this leaves us in an endless loop. I think people who don't know about the series should be banned from unlocking random downgrades but whatever. As I said, we explain both the author's words and the places from the novel in context, but you ignore it because you don't understand.
- 1,528
- 855
I'll say things to refute your arguments after school today, but I doubt you'll understand.
- 2,134
- 2,421
The question that was asked the author was about how big the actual universe the solar system is in. The universe, as author himself answered, is the size of the our observable one which is 46.508 billion light years in radius. Thats simple. You're probably misunderstanding something yourself if you're so hung up on it. If you have a problem with how this wiki treats 3-A or Low 2-C, make a separate thread. With author answers and the context I've provided previously meets this site's standards.
Just stating the facts. And certainly the most you deserve in that situation.
LuciferX
He/Him- 634
- 298
- Thread starter
- #106
Again, he said "I think so". It's not a damn confirmation.
Observable universe is multi galactic size and a solar system sized world is way lower than it.
Based upon a vague statement + exposing lack of knowledge about obs. universe. bro, literary said, obs universe is not multi galactic size.
Our observable universe ends with a solar system? Lmao.
- 2,134
- 2,421
It is, especially since you see him previously correct others if they get something wrong.
Observable Universe is 3-A without time and Low 2-C with time. Don't like it? Make a CRT in staff discussion or something.
I don't think you know what you're talking about at this point. The statement isn't vague, since he quite literally answered a straight forward question. Don't like it? Find a way to cope with it. Not my problem.
At this point it feels like you're strawmanning me, or maybe even the Author? Everything is pretty clear, of what I've presented. Did I say our universe was solar system sized? No. But if that's your conclusion of what I said, you have a serious reading comprehension problem.
LuciferX
He/Him- 634
- 298
- Thread starter
- #108
It is not. just stop this.
It is multi galactic size imao.
No. It doesn't. He literary disproved that user's claims before. debunk it saying a solar system sized universe, debunked again saying it's not infinite.
Then it only proves, author misspoke there.
Why don't you understand such simple things?
- 2,134
- 2,421
I won't stop because I know I'm right. You should stop.
If you're talking about how this wiki treats the observable universe either make a CRT or cope.
Wrong. He quite literally answered clear cut question with a clear cut answer. Don't twist what the author states.
I've explained everything crystal clear several times. You don't understand. Not my problem anymore.
- 1,528
- 855
Well, first I'll touch on afterlife>real world. 12 episodes of real world anime are what we see throughout the 12 volumes of the novel. However, at the end of volume 12, we encounter the other world, the afterlife, with a notebook that Fujiko found. In this notebook, scientists talk about the fact that the real world is fictional and not real, but these people are real people in 3D, how can this be? The way to find out is to look at the world from the outside! When they say looking from the outside, they look for and find a way to go to the afterlife of the other world, not to go out of this solar system, but to look with a different perspective. After going to afterlife and coming back, yes, they say this world is fiction. It is completely real from the inside, but when we look at it from a higher existence from the outside, it becomes fictional; in short, for the afterlife, the real world is a fictional non-real structure. In addition to what I said, the author also states that afterlife is a higher dimensional world, so yes, afterlife is definitely a higher fiction, higher dimensional than real world.
- 8,805
- 2,864
Guys please stop with the passive-aggressive attitude and the memes.
Also isn't this pretty much the same thread as always?
Also isn't this pretty much the same thread as always?
- 1,528
- 855
Yeah, again and again and again use same argumant but we here and answer this
Jorosai77
He/Him- 58
- 17
Yeah, it feels the same as the old threads that try to do this.
- 2,134
- 2,421
Yea, my apologies. I must have gotten a bit too annoyed and said some unnecessary things.
Pretty much. I mean this was debunked by DT iirc
- 18,393
- 14,323
I disagree with the thread. Not adequate to downgrade it.
- 18,393
- 14,323
typical copy and paste lol
- 545
- 130
yeah, if you look at his previous debunk threads then you'll see the similarities in this one, even though he changed it a bit
Jorosai77
He/Him- 58
- 17
yeah now that im taking a look at both of them yeah they are very similar
- Status
Similar threads
