Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is. since author directly said universe end with SS. easily debunked.It's not.
He didn't explain anything. He said transcendence term is diff to describe regarding akuto trascending tloi, not answered for dream part.It's not, it asks about how it's possible to trancend the hierarchy if it's made of infinite r>f dreams and the author explains that's it just works because it's that type of trancendence (you know, void body)
DKD fans (fanboys) goes brrrrrr.
DKD fans (fanboys) goes brrrrrr.
Great Arguement.Talking about the series with someone who hasn't read it is a complete headache because it comes up with nonsense completely out of context, just like the debunk written on comic vine, and it's really hard to explain to that person because they haven't read it, especially if that person doesn't want to understand.
Wrong. I posted the real context of the questions asked.It is. since author directly said universe end with SS. easily debunked.
What he means is that the infinite r>f layers were transcended by Akuto simply because that's how things work. Only time he did, was with void body. Only logical explanation to that is that void body can trancend infinite r>f layers and bring Akuto to TLOIs level.He didn't explain anything. He said transcendence term is diff to describe regarding akuto trascending tloi, not answered for dream part.
Bro why answer that question, did you read to dkd? A person who collects and throws away the articles he sees randomly without reading the series has no right to say that dkd fans
claim I didn't read series.
make arguements without evidence.
upvoting his friend.
tell others I'm wrong.
You are saying author is wrong? Nice.Wrong. I posted the real context of the questions asked.
Still he didn't answer to that part. Hitchen's razor trice. making up things as usual.What he means is that the infinite r>f layers were transcended by Akuto simply because that's how things work. Only time he did, was with void body. Only logical explanation to that is that void body can trancend infinite r>f layers and bring Akuto to TLOIs level.
Tbh it does feel the same with a bit of changesif you really read the series, prove that even your Tread made it almost similar to comicvine even though you changed it a little
You're literally going against what author said. I posted the full question and author answers. This isn't the only time you only post answers and leave out the questions. So you're ignoring author isn't my problem.You are saying author is wrong? Nice.
Nothing I said was made up. I explained it clear enough. Maybe read again a couple dozen times.Still he didn't answer to that part. Hitchen's razor trice. making up things as usual.
Wrong, I did debunk you. You're literally going in circles saying I'm wrong yet you don't even post the questions author answered, and if you do, you twist his words.You didn't even debunk my very first arguement that debunks dream hierarchy.
But that is true ı explain this who someone has read to daimou and ı explain who someone hasn't read to dkd and clearly difficult explain because you don't understand any think and You keep throwing things out of context before us. we say, what can we do that it does not express it in the context, you repeat what you say without caring because you do not know the context, and this is seriously tiring my friend.Great Arguement.
You clearly don't know what means by observable universe.You're literally going against what author said. I posted the full question and author answers. This isn't the only time you only post answers and leave out the questions. So you're ignoring author isn't my problem.
Is this your counter arguement? Wow.Wrong, I did debunk you. You're literally going in circles saying I'm wrong yet you don't even post the questions author answered, and if you do, you twist his words.
Then debunk my claims instead of ducking from main point and asking irrelevant stuff to change the topic.But that is true ı explain this who someone has read to daimou and ı explain who someone hasn't read to dkd and clearly difficult explain because you don't understand any think and You keep throwing things out of context before us. we say, what can we do that it does not express it in the context, you repeat what you say without caring because you do not know the context, and this is seriously tiring my friend.
Make proper arguements. Typing a long essay without using actual arguments with evidence is dumb.I explain that argumant and you dont understand and you repeat again and again same word same sentence.No matter how I explain it, someone who doesn't read dkd and does their best to lower it will ignore and continue to repeat the same things, and this leaves us in an endless loop. I think people who don't know about the series should be banned from unlocking random downgrades but whatever. As I said, we explain both the author's words and the places from the novel in context, but you ignore it because you don't understand.
I'll say things to refute your arguments after school today, but I doubt you'll understand.Then debunk my claims instead of ducking from main point and asking irrelevant stuff to change the topic.
The question that was asked the author was about how big the actual universe the solar system is in. The universe, as author himself answered, is the size of the our observable one which is 46.508 billion light years in radius. Thats simple. You're probably misunderstanding something yourself if you're so hung up on it. If you have a problem with how this wiki treats 3-A or Low 2-C, make a separate thread. With author answers and the context I've provided previously meets this site's standards.You clearly don't know what means by observable universe.
Just stating the facts. And certainly the most you deserve in that situation.Is this your counter arguement? Wow.
Again, he said "I think so". It's not a damn confirmation.The question that was asked the author was about how big the actual universe the solar system is in. The universe, as author himself answered, is the size of the our observable one which is 46.508 billion light years in radius. Thats simple. You're probably misunderstanding something yourself if you're so hung up on it. If you have a problem with how this wiki treats 3-A or Low 2-C, make a separate thread. With author answers and the context I've provided previously meets this site's standards.
It is, especially since you see him previously correct others if they get something wrong.Again, he said "I think so". It's not a damn confirmation.
Observable Universe is 3-A without time and Low 2-C with time. Don't like it? Make a CRT in staff discussion or something.Observable universe is multi galactic size and a solar system sized world is way lower than it.
I don't think you know what you're talking about at this point. The statement isn't vague, since he quite literally answered a straight forward question. Don't like it? Find a way to cope with it. Not my problem.Based upon a vague statement + exposing lack of knowledge about obs. universe. bro, literary said, obs universe is not multi galactic size.
At this point it feels like you're strawmanning me, or maybe even the Author? Everything is pretty clear, of what I've presented. Did I say our universe was solar system sized? No. But if that's your conclusion of what I said, you have a serious reading comprehension problem.Our observable universe ends with a solar system? Lmao.
It is not. just stop this.It is, especially since you see him previously correct others if they get something wrong.
It is multi galactic size imao.Observable Universe is 3-A without time and Low 2-C with time. Don't like it? Make a CRT in staff discussion or something.
No. It doesn't. He literary disproved that user's claims before. debunk it saying a solar system sized universe, debunked again saying it's not infinite.I don't think you know what you're talking about at this point. The statement isn't vague, since he quite literally answered a straight forward question. Don't like it? Find a way to cope with it. Not my problem.
Then it only proves, author misspoke there.At this point it feels like you're strawmanning me, or maybe even the Author? Everything is pretty clear, of what I've presented. Did I say our universe was solar system sized? No. But if that's your conclusion of what I said, you have a serious reading comprehension problem.
I won't stop because I know I'm right. You should stop.It is not. just stop this.
If you're talking about how this wiki treats the observable universe either make a CRT or cope.It is multi galactic size imao.
Wrong. He quite literally answered clear cut question with a clear cut answer. Don't twist what the author states.No. It doesn't. He literary disproved that user's claims before. debunk it saying a solar system sized universe, debunked again saying it's not infinite.
Then it only proves, author misspoke there.
I've explained everything crystal clear several times. You don't understand. Not my problem anymore.Why don't you understand such simple things?
Yeah, again and again and again use same argumant but we here and answer thisGuys please stop with the passive-aggressive attitude and the memes.
Also isn't this pretty much the same thread as always?
Evidence? You need to explain it with scans.Well, first I'll touch on afterlife>real world. 12 episodes of real world anime are what we see throughout the 12 volumes of the novel. However, at the end of volume 12, we encounter the other world, the afterlife, with a notebook that Fujiko found. In this notebook, scientists talk about the fact that the real world is fictional and not real, but these people are real people in 3D, how can this be? The way to find out is to look at the world from the outside! When they say looking from the outside, they look for and find a way to go to the afterlife of the other world, not to go out of this solar system, but to look with a different perspective. After going to afterlife and coming back, yes, they say this world is fiction. It is completely real from the inside, but when we look at it from a higher existence from the outside, it becomes fictional; in short, for the afterlife, the real world is a fictional non-real structure. In addition to what I said, the author also states that afterlife is a higher dimensional world, so yes, afterlife is definitely a higher fiction, higher dimensional than real world.
Yeah, it feels the same as the old threads that try to do this.Guys please stop with the passive-aggressive attitude and the memes.
Also isn't this pretty much the same thread as always?
Yea, my apologies. I must have gotten a bit too annoyed and said some unnecessary things.Guys please stop with the passive-aggressive attitude and the memes.
Pretty much. I mean this was debunked by DT iircAlso isn't this pretty much the same thread as always?
typical copy and paste lolthis debunk thread is very similar to the previous debunk thread from comicvine and it was denied by DT, even the argument is the same from comicvine even though he changed it a bit
yeah, if you look at his previous debunk threads then you'll see the similarities in this one, even though he changed it a bittypical copy and paste
yeah now that im taking a look at both of them yeah they are very similaryeah, if you look at his previous debunk threads then you'll see the similarities in this one, even though he changed it a bit