- 1,286
- 342
Would a higher-dimensional space comprised of imaginary axes be HDE or BDE 1, or both?
The imaginary space would lack spatiotemporal axes, instead having a different "type" of axes that is different in nature to spatiotemporal ones; imaginary axes (So it isn't defined by them, but isn't superior (and is in fact equal to them as the set of imaginary numbers is equal to the set of real numbers mathematically), which sounds like BDE 1 for sure (especially because BDE only ever mentions spatiotemporal dimensions and never any other type of dimension such as imaginary ones).
Though an imaginary space can still be considered to be a "higher dimension" in addition to this, it just uses a different type of axis to achieve it, but it can still be defined by dimensions...just not spatiotemporally. So HDE may still be possible alongside BDE 1.
The imaginary space would lack spatiotemporal axes, instead having a different "type" of axes that is different in nature to spatiotemporal ones; imaginary axes (So it isn't defined by them, but isn't superior (and is in fact equal to them as the set of imaginary numbers is equal to the set of real numbers mathematically), which sounds like BDE 1 for sure (especially because BDE only ever mentions spatiotemporal dimensions and never any other type of dimension such as imaginary ones).
Though an imaginary space can still be considered to be a "higher dimension" in addition to this, it just uses a different type of axis to achieve it, but it can still be defined by dimensions...just not spatiotemporally. So HDE may still be possible alongside BDE 1.