- 8,217
- 1,358
Time to make a complete and total fool of myself again. Oh well.
So recently, a page for Yumeko Jabami, a ******* gambler with 10-B AP and no powers or abilities, was agreed to be totally okay. You know what that means...
COOL CAT TIME
Yes, he was dumb. Yes, he was memetic. Yes, he was a joke character. Now go tell that to Barney, Shrek, Robbie Rotten, and all those other dumb, memetic, joke characters.
No, he wasn't made to troll anyone.
"Make a deliberately offensive or provocative online post with the aim of upsetting someone or eliciting an angry response from them."
That's the definition of "troll".
Q: How is Cool Cat offensive or provocative? A: He isn't.
Q: How does he upset anybody? A: He doesn't.
And no, he was not going to cause a controversy. For the 69000000000000000000000000th time, I asked Derek for permission and he said yes. Even if he did try suing us, the only results would be support from Derek's opponents, and any lawsuit he could try filing against us (which he has never done, even to the guy who called him and Cool Cat pedophiles) would be over in a millisecond, if anyone would even accept it as a real legal battle. Plus, Derek has bigger fish to fry than us, and he hasn't even fried them. It seems that he's learned a lesson from the IHE drama, because there are people out there right now replying to his Twitter account with images of Cool Cat at 9/11, the Hindenburg disaster, and public lynchings, and he's done nothing to stop them. And if he hasn't done anything to them, he won't do anything to us. There's also several examples showing that he won't attack communities larger than his, such as when he actually praised PewDiePie for his bad review of Cool Cat Kids Superhero. He'd be going up against the entire FANDOM community if he tried suing us for this.
So recently, a page for Yumeko Jabami, a ******* gambler with 10-B AP and no powers or abilities, was agreed to be totally okay. You know what that means...
COOL CAT TIME
Yes, he was dumb. Yes, he was memetic. Yes, he was a joke character. Now go tell that to Barney, Shrek, Robbie Rotten, and all those other dumb, memetic, joke characters.
No, he wasn't made to troll anyone.
"Make a deliberately offensive or provocative online post with the aim of upsetting someone or eliciting an angry response from them."
That's the definition of "troll".
Q: How is Cool Cat offensive or provocative? A: He isn't.
Q: How does he upset anybody? A: He doesn't.
And no, he was not going to cause a controversy. For the 69000000000000000000000000th time, I asked Derek for permission and he said yes. Even if he did try suing us, the only results would be support from Derek's opponents, and any lawsuit he could try filing against us (which he has never done, even to the guy who called him and Cool Cat pedophiles) would be over in a millisecond, if anyone would even accept it as a real legal battle. Plus, Derek has bigger fish to fry than us, and he hasn't even fried them. It seems that he's learned a lesson from the IHE drama, because there are people out there right now replying to his Twitter account with images of Cool Cat at 9/11, the Hindenburg disaster, and public lynchings, and he's done nothing to stop them. And if he hasn't done anything to them, he won't do anything to us. There's also several examples showing that he won't attack communities larger than his, such as when he actually praised PewDiePie for his bad review of Cool Cat Kids Superhero. He'd be going up against the entire FANDOM community if he tried suing us for this.
