• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

About Celestial Body Feats

If there is, then we have to go on a case by case basis, though in most cases, it likely won't matter unless the verse makes a big deal about it.
 
Yeah I'm still not sure that's the best bet.

Case by case is good obviously but still.

If we slap At least ____, likely higher on them I can make do with that.
 
Im not sure, i dont even think theres any characters i debate this applies to, i just think theres a problem.

The likely higher should still be noted though.
 
The infinite mass punch was explicitly stated to (somewhat) follow the laws of physics in terms of energy, which is why it can be used.
 
It seems so arbitrary to me.

We allow some things here and there because "it's fiction so it doesn't matter", but then in other cases we say "that's impossible according to physics".

Where do we draw the line, exactly?
 
We usually only allow relativistic energy up to 93% (?) of the speed of light, to avoid inflated results. However, we made an exception with the Flash since his mass had explicitly increased to that of a white dwarf star.
 
Again, to avoid ridiculously high results for fictions that do not apply real world standards for near lightspeed travel.
 
We already use it, but high ends that end up with almost infinite results seem like a bad idea.
 
You COULD just use the objects mass-energy equivalent.

So moving a planet at FTL speed would give you Small Star level+
 
Why? I can see the argument for the high end relativistic KE (even if I disagree with it) but why mass-energy?
 
Back
Top