-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Ability Activation.
- Thread starter Rendynoc0unter
- Start date
-
- Tags
- ability activation
- Status
- 34,541
- 34,960
I know. I'm saying I don't think there is enough to justify a whole page.
Abstractly_a_Protagonist
He/Him- 1,675
- 1,430
It's better to add it to the hax page than creating a whole new page. IMO.
- 1,803
- 5,315
- Thread starter
- #44
You mean Standard Battle Assumptions? If so.
Then we won't change everything, but rather. Just adding about the always active hax in the SBA Rules section.
If I'm wrong, please forgive me. I couldn't focus well today.
ricatthegoat
He/Him- 204
- 74
Making a whole new page for these... I think it's better to put it in VSBattle Glossary than making a new page for these, though some profiles have "passive" written beside their abilities.
ricatthegoat
He/Him- 204
- 74
Standard Battle Assumption page isn't used for explaining all of the "page" you proposed, rather it explains about the rules on matchups on this wiki.
- 1,803
- 5,315
- Thread starter
- #48
Yes, i know it.
- 5,879
- 1,075
Why would it be better to make a page for this than to just explain the ability on the profile
- 177,303
- 90,180
So is the staff consensus here to add a new section to our Standard Battle Assumptions page, and if so, would you be fine with it @DontTalkDT , @LordGriffin1000 , and @Theglassman12?
- 16,442
- 13,333
I personally still don't think it's needed but I guess it isn't going to cause any problems so I don't really havs an issue with it being added.
- 18,393
- 14,332
Tbh, I saw many profiles that have a “passive” section in power and abilities (if the hax are a lot) and if it is not enough, there are many characters that have “passive” beside the said ability. I am sure you are purposing this for the abilities that are “thought-based”. Welp, is this not enough to clarify it in Notable and techniques?
For Rimuru verse, the rimuru verse supporters could create a page for abilities and users who have thought—based and added it to relevant characters.
Active is self-explanatory. Always active can be added into Notable and techniques.
For Rimuru verse, the rimuru verse supporters could create a page for abilities and users who have thought—based and added it to relevant characters.
Active is self-explanatory. Always active can be added into Notable and techniques.
- 3,273
- 1,246
escanor from seven deadly sins is perfect example for this.
good example : Many runic magic/items in God of War Norse. For example spatial manip which activate when damage is taken, dodging enemies attack, hitting enemies, etc.
- 177,303
- 90,180
Thank you for the reply. We need more staff confirmations first though.
IdiosyncraticLawyer
Username OnlyVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 3,604
- 4,333
Bump.
- 177,303
- 90,180
- 13,826
- 19,638
Nope. But as Note either on SBA page or Hax page.
- 13,826
- 19,638
Creation of new page for this has been rejected and apparently @Damage3245 proposal has enough support.
It should be added as Note: @DarkDragonMedeus , @LordGriffin1000 , @Damage3245
Disagree: none.
Donttalkdt hasn't given any position regarding being against or with the proposal.
- 15,741
- 5,341
Ok. I fear this will lead to misconceptions if not done properly
I would only agree with this if it covers those topics I mentioned, properly. It should take 2 paragraphs at minimum.
- We are not saying when a character can active an ability in many ways. There is bound to be people that see a character activate abilities in many ways but only see whatever is the most broken. Or do recognize that they trigger their abilities in more than 1 way but only claim that for battle they only do so in the most broken way, regardless of what their media may actually portray them doing in-character, with the people here being aware of how better it is to trigger powers as soon as possible, but maybe the media portraying that the characters themselves doesn't follow this train of thought at all (Either because they simply don't, or because it's easier or better for them to use those powers in that way & this is left unsaid for the audience to understand anyway, by virtue of the characters doing those "convoluted activation requirements" from time to time).
- It's not like an ability just happens at once upon being first triggered, there are other factors at play like the time it takes to manifest after being triggered and the time until it is completely finished, which in turn can vary from display to display of very same ability.
I would only agree with this if it covers those topics I mentioned, properly. It should take 2 paragraphs at minimum.
- 1,803
- 5,315
- Thread starter
- #63
ah shit, I forgot about this thread and completely forgot why I brought this up in the past, and yes, there was some misunderstanding on my part about the activation I described above, and I already talked to Ant, that maybe in the future I will make a new crt with more solid arguments.
with this, I think this thread can be closed.
with this, I think this thread can be closed.
- Status
Similar threads
