• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

A very specific question.

11,102
2,399
@1st_Virtue_of_Pure_Void reached out to me and asked would it be a low 1C cosmology if there were an infinite amount of people in an infinite universe where when a person makes a choice another universe is created followed by another and another than another for each choice being made basically branching out into more and more universes followed by more and more due to making a single choice in any given universes creates another one.

Anyone has an answer to this?
 
Are they well ordered?
Chaotic. An infinite amount of people assuming their names are in the CHAR format (might also be integer as well) , making many different choices at once seems to create a bigger infinity.
 
Last edited:
2-A, it makes a bigger Infinity but in the end, it's not a greater/higher Infinity.
The difference is that if you were to have an Infinite spread sheet and switch up the letters of the 1st person's 1st letter of their name, the 2nd letter of the 2nd person's name, etc ,etc. You will have a name that will not appear in the infinite set so basically it's a set of infinity that's bigger than the set of all natural numbers.
 
The difference is that if you were to have an Infinite spread sheet and switch up the letters of the 1st person's 1st letter of their name, the 2nd letter of the 2nd person's name, etc ,etc. You will have a name that will not appear in the infinite set so basically it's a set of infinity that's bigger than the set of all natural numbers.
So you're saying it reaches uncountable infinity?
 
The difference is that if you were to have an Infinite spread sheet and switch up the letters of the 1st person's 1st letter of their name, the 2nd letter of the 2nd person's name, etc ,etc. You will have a name that will not appear in the infinite set so basically it's a set of infinity that's bigger than the set of all natural numbers.
If that's what your implying then there seems to be some kind of set or element function so in this context it's Low1c to higher maybe.
 
The difference is that if you were to have an Infinite spread sheet and switch up the letters of the 1st person's 1st letter of their name, the 2nd letter of the 2nd person's name, etc ,etc. You will have a name that will not appear in the infinite set so basically it's a set of infinity that's bigger than the set of all natural numbers.
Chaotic. An infinite amount of people assuming their names are in the integer format, making many different choices at once seems to create a bigger infinity.
Anyways this seem to reach Low1c to higher adding this to account.

Note that a integer format doesn't have a decimal point(simple math) but based on this context you seem to imply that there are a collection of subsets and power sets and that power set functions are used here.
 
Last edited:
If I'm getting it right, an infinite multiverse where every possibility is accounted for and creates its own parallel universe, would mean a greater infinity, hence low 1C?
Yeah your getting this right i think.

So this infinite universe seems to have a power set bigger than it's own cardinal.

Atleast if the universe has the infinite possibillity thing.
 
Back
Top