- 18,738
- 5,917
I agree this is redundant
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, I disagree with OP. In that we shouldn't have a page for it, maybe just like a definition or tab on a page that already exists (likely the inconsistency page) as "anti-feat" is entirely dependent on the situation.Sera Loveheart said:So you're saying an anti feat is a feat that goes against other feats/showings? That ultimately goes back to inconsistency and outlier.
Then why did you use the term "anti-feat" to describe ridiculous low ends like Thor not being able to beat 5 sharks and the inability to blitz a human?LordXcano said:I feel it needs a separate tab because the point of an "anti-feat" isn't to be an inconsistency, but rather to disprove that a higher-end is consistent and/or show the lower-end is more consistent.
I agree with Promestein's solution. It seems most appropriate to simply expand the description for low-end feats in the Outlier page, according to Reppuzan's initial suggestion, combined with making a separate Anti-Feats page, according to Matthew's suggestion.Promestein said:Matt's definition makes sense to me. Looking at our other pages for outliers / inconsistency / PIS, it'd likely be for the best to clean them all up (the outlier and inconsistency page seem to be copied from the OBD), along with making an anti-feat page, so our definitions are all consistent with one another and we can reference the other terms for comparisons.
I know I know, this is probably a user trying to demonstrate to us what an anti-feat is (despite us already knowing what the concept is), but nonetheless, I cannot stand for misinformation about one of my favourite verses; therefore shall correct you, as pitiful as that sounds.Moathon said:Here's a good anti-feat:
Kars being faster than light yet isn't even a bullet timer and could be fought or even outran against regular humans, like Ceasar or Jonathan.
Apologies.Antvasima said:Try to stay on topic please.