• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

a minor Jevil rewording proposal

Status
Not open for further replies.

Axorandom0

He/Him
Messages
1,013
Reaction score
466
Jevil’s profile has some wording and justifications which are just… not clear and, on the surface, seemingly false.

For Jevil’s speed and durability, they say that he’s fought Spamton before and uses that as the justification (Speed: “Could keep up with the likes of Spamton during a battle” Durability: “Has fought Spamton in the past many times and always managed to beat him.”)

Now, I think the reason this is here is because of a link also put on the AP section to help prove that Jevil is the “clown around town”, which says “EVEN IF I [Cheated] [(theoretically)] I NEVER [You’re Winner] EVEN ONCE!!!”, though to me this only implies that they may have battled.

So, my proposal for new justifications on Jevil’s profile is to make the Speed and Durability ones more akin to AP while also noting that it is implied that Jevil has beaten several times Spamton before, linking to the “I NEVER [You’re WINNER]” screenshot. Maybe something like “Stated to be superior to Spamton and is implied to have beaten him on several occasions before, meaning that he should be faster / meaning that he should have been capable of taking hits from Spamton.”

(I don’t remember how many agrees I need for something as minor yet kinda important as this to be accepted…)
 
Is 1 staff approval enough for me to go ahead and change something like this?
Here's our rules on minor content revisions.

One is enough for this, yes.

However, you're meant to wait 24 hours from the thread creation date before actually applying the changes, just in case someone has an objection.

Once that elapses, and the change has been applied, let me know, and I'll close the thread.
 
(I struggled with my wording a bit there. Just to be clear, the grace period ends in about nine hours from now.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top