- 1,155
- 159
I dropped off the face of this wiki a while back simply because I was ashamed of the nonsense I pulled back in 2018-2023.
During that time, I spent my time focusing on my studies in college, which rather coincidentally, happened to be philosophy of antiquity. I returned recently and saw the tiering system. How it had changed. Imagine the absolute shock on my face when I saw the (neo)platonic One being used as the standard of Tier 0. Here's a question that came to mind when I saw this. Why are we enshrining what amounts to the western conception of the Abrahamic God or the One as the supposed pinnacle of FICTIONAL power? This brings countless problems to mind.
1: It's outright disrespectful
It's blatantly disrespectful, and holds no regards for those who actually study and hold faiths regarding these entities in real life. By using the theological One/God as the "golden standard" for Tier 0, we may as well rename Tier 0 to "Tier 0: Abrahamic God", for that is essentially what has been done. And we may as well be flinging the middle finger at all those who follow such a being, because now we have tacitly proclaimed and admitted to the world that such a figure is fictional, and as such comparable by fictional entities.
2: Inconsistencies in how the TS even defines "Oneness"
It makes no sense. The One is the One because it is the One. Even the slightest deficiency in one of its attributes (such as its lack of thought) would mean it is no longer the One. Plotinus himself had entire sections of the Enneads (Especially Enn. 6) devoted to making this rule clear. If Tier 0 means you are practically in all respects the One, then why are we allowing those that do not fully admit of its characteristics the same tier, and not High 1-A? This ties back into #1 where we're essentially ripping off entire sections of the Enneads and yet when the Enneads says something that inhibits tiering purposes it is ignored. Disrespectful, much?
3: Profiles at this level of transcendence are outright nonsensical
The One and those that are "Onelike" are not people. The One is not a being. It is not an idea. For all intents and purposes, it is not a "character" in the traditional sense. It does not possess intellect, consciousness, or self-awareness. All of the early Neoplatonic thinkers confirm this, and we can confidently say this because the One necessarily exists in apophatic reality. Hell, even some Christians do; contradicting their own scripture.
We don't give a page to the Mathiverse because it is not a character, and yet we give pages to entities on the same level as the One, and for all intents and purposes are the One? Are we going to give a page to a pebble next, and give it a tiering of 10-C?
4: The special pleading of religion on this wiki
Wiki rules explicitly state that religious pages cannot be used on this wiki. And yet, we have essentially carved the Abrahamic/Western God into the pinnacle of our tiering system? And yet we don't allow pages on Zeus or Buddha or Thor for what reason? And before anyone tells me that Neoplatonism is secular—
No, it isn't. Plotinus, Porphyry, Iamblichus, and Proclus all mention divinity, Gods, "ascension through enlightenment", afterlives, and even associations with Gods numerous times throughout their works. The Christians then later built upon it with their own theologies. Again, this ties directly back into #1. We have ripped what is essentially theological/divine text and used it for the purposes of indexing fictional characters. There are even entire books and studies that hint that Neoplatonism has its roots in the ancient Greek mystery rites/cults, such as those of Pythagoras. At its very core, Neoplatonism is religious and theological in nature.
That's not even mentioning that to this day, neopagans and Christians exist which use the Neoplatonic texts in their faiths.
5: The artificial constraints of using Neoplatonic philosophy
Who's to say that this is, at all, the limit? The original Boundless worked superbly well because it was deliberately left open and flexible:
Guess what? The One would have been Tier 0 even were it not for this new change, meaning this entire revision was outright unnecessary.
You may even find that adding such a well-defined limit may even backfire on the attempt to prevent the predatory power-creep of some authors. After all, now they have a sure-fire way of ensuring that Tier 0s appear in their work. They just have to add the One into their story, word for word—and boom! Tier 0 franchise. No need for complex cosmologies, no need for dimensional tierings. And best of all, we've even popularized it because it's now enshrined on the wiki. Thankfully the SCP franchise was nuked, because I can absolutely assure you the writers on that site would have immediately jumped at the chance to replicate the One. Now we're really actively working towards limiting creativity, eh?
5: Summary
You know what we've done? We've embededed religious theology into our tiering system. And not just religious theology; we've enshrined Western religious theological absolutes as the alleged pinnacle of power. And not only that, we've tacitly admitted that these theologies are fictional, and that these Gods are fair game for utilization in indexing because they're also fictional, right?
But hey, that's just my two cents.
During that time, I spent my time focusing on my studies in college, which rather coincidentally, happened to be philosophy of antiquity. I returned recently and saw the tiering system. How it had changed. Imagine the absolute shock on my face when I saw the (neo)platonic One being used as the standard of Tier 0. Here's a question that came to mind when I saw this. Why are we enshrining what amounts to the western conception of the Abrahamic God or the One as the supposed pinnacle of FICTIONAL power? This brings countless problems to mind.
1: It's outright disrespectful
It's blatantly disrespectful, and holds no regards for those who actually study and hold faiths regarding these entities in real life. By using the theological One/God as the "golden standard" for Tier 0, we may as well rename Tier 0 to "Tier 0: Abrahamic God", for that is essentially what has been done. And we may as well be flinging the middle finger at all those who follow such a being, because now we have tacitly proclaimed and admitted to the world that such a figure is fictional, and as such comparable by fictional entities.
2: Inconsistencies in how the TS even defines "Oneness"
It makes no sense. The One is the One because it is the One. Even the slightest deficiency in one of its attributes (such as its lack of thought) would mean it is no longer the One. Plotinus himself had entire sections of the Enneads (Especially Enn. 6) devoted to making this rule clear. If Tier 0 means you are practically in all respects the One, then why are we allowing those that do not fully admit of its characteristics the same tier, and not High 1-A? This ties back into #1 where we're essentially ripping off entire sections of the Enneads and yet when the Enneads says something that inhibits tiering purposes it is ignored. Disrespectful, much?
3: Profiles at this level of transcendence are outright nonsensical
The One and those that are "Onelike" are not people. The One is not a being. It is not an idea. For all intents and purposes, it is not a "character" in the traditional sense. It does not possess intellect, consciousness, or self-awareness. All of the early Neoplatonic thinkers confirm this, and we can confidently say this because the One necessarily exists in apophatic reality. Hell, even some Christians do; contradicting their own scripture.
We don't give a page to the Mathiverse because it is not a character, and yet we give pages to entities on the same level as the One, and for all intents and purposes are the One? Are we going to give a page to a pebble next, and give it a tiering of 10-C?
4: The special pleading of religion on this wiki
Wiki rules explicitly state that religious pages cannot be used on this wiki. And yet, we have essentially carved the Abrahamic/Western God into the pinnacle of our tiering system? And yet we don't allow pages on Zeus or Buddha or Thor for what reason? And before anyone tells me that Neoplatonism is secular—
No, it isn't. Plotinus, Porphyry, Iamblichus, and Proclus all mention divinity, Gods, "ascension through enlightenment", afterlives, and even associations with Gods numerous times throughout their works. The Christians then later built upon it with their own theologies. Again, this ties directly back into #1. We have ripped what is essentially theological/divine text and used it for the purposes of indexing fictional characters. There are even entire books and studies that hint that Neoplatonism has its roots in the ancient Greek mystery rites/cults, such as those of Pythagoras. At its very core, Neoplatonism is religious and theological in nature.
That's not even mentioning that to this day, neopagans and Christians exist which use the Neoplatonic texts in their faiths.
5: The artificial constraints of using Neoplatonic philosophy
Who's to say that this is, at all, the limit? The original Boundless worked superbly well because it was deliberately left open and flexible:
Now we've imposed an artificial and nigh-impossibly difficult standard to reach Tier 0, and we have no clue if it's even the correct limit or standard for Tier 0, because for whatever reason, we've decided to focus and put one specific and obscure Western school of thought in the limelight. We've placed a limit on the creativity of works by putting an arbitrarily-chosen lid on the can of worms that is the TS.Characters or objects that can affect structures which completely exceed the logical foundations of High 1-A, much like it exceeds the ones defining 1-A and below, meaning that all possible levels of High 1-A are exceeded, even an infinite or uncountably amount of such levels. This tier has no endpoint, and can be extended to any higher level just like the ones above.
Guess what? The One would have been Tier 0 even were it not for this new change, meaning this entire revision was outright unnecessary.
You may even find that adding such a well-defined limit may even backfire on the attempt to prevent the predatory power-creep of some authors. After all, now they have a sure-fire way of ensuring that Tier 0s appear in their work. They just have to add the One into their story, word for word—and boom! Tier 0 franchise. No need for complex cosmologies, no need for dimensional tierings. And best of all, we've even popularized it because it's now enshrined on the wiki. Thankfully the SCP franchise was nuked, because I can absolutely assure you the writers on that site would have immediately jumped at the chance to replicate the One. Now we're really actively working towards limiting creativity, eh?
5: Summary
You know what we've done? We've embededed religious theology into our tiering system. And not just religious theology; we've enshrined Western religious theological absolutes as the alleged pinnacle of power. And not only that, we've tacitly admitted that these theologies are fictional, and that these Gods are fair game for utilization in indexing because they're also fictional, right?
But hey, that's just my two cents.