-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
6C Ahsoka Tano
- Thread starter LordWhis
- Start date
- 4,333
- 291
No, that statement means that in the Empire, only Palpatine and Vader can hold their own against her.
It also doesn't include people comparable or superior to her who are either on the side of the good guys (Kenobi, maybe Yoda (assumming he wouldn't die of a heart attack in a fight)), or independents like Maul.
It also doesn't include people comparable or superior to her who are either on the side of the good guys (Kenobi, maybe Yoda (assumming he wouldn't die of a heart attack in a fight)), or independents like Maul.
- 1,102
- 66
Sup whis glad to see you on this site still, as for Bruce and Gyro then that statement should get revised. Because that's making a literal and direct comparison. "
in the Empire, only Palpatine and Vader can hold their own against her." would perfectly replace it in fact. But if it's saying she can match sidious, then it's literally saying "She could match sidious" There is no other way to interpret that, it would be border line sped to think otherwise. That is pretty much a problem there aren't meant to be any hidden meanings when phrases like that are outright stated are stated. Feats > Statements, don't get me wrong, however if there is no feat to refrence then the statement should (If reasonable) be taken with much more than a grain of salt and there is nothing wrong with revising threads
in the Empire, only Palpatine and Vader can hold their own against her." would perfectly replace it in fact. But if it's saying she can match sidious, then it's literally saying "She could match sidious" There is no other way to interpret that, it would be border line sped to think otherwise. That is pretty much a problem there aren't meant to be any hidden meanings when phrases like that are outright stated are stated. Feats > Statements, don't get me wrong, however if there is no feat to refrence then the statement should (If reasonable) be taken with much more than a grain of salt and there is nothing wrong with revising threads
- 1,102
- 66
There is a possibility Ahsoka was holding back, after hearing and seeing Anakin, she looked pretty overwhelmed. And there is no telling just how powerful Ahsoka gotten, maybe not equal I wouldn't dare, but relative very possible. And that isn't taking force ability into account they were dueling, and we know that dueling ability doesn't match force ability.GyroNutz said:
- 1,102
- 66
"Vader imagined the power that could be his if he crushed Palpatine and established his own rule over the Empire. But first, he would need his own apprentice. By himself, he could not hope to defeat the most powerful Sith Lord the galaxy had ever known." --Taken from Vader: The Ultimate GuideCropfist said:
