5-D question

[FTW395]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the "space" between different universes considered 4-D? If so shouldn't the space between multiple multiverses be 5-D?

 

[FTW395]

Bump

 

[TheMightyRegulator]

Unless it's infinite a multiverse is just 4D.

An infinite multiverse, however, is a small 5-D. Just existing between it isn't enough however, it must be noted to exist beyond it entirely.

 

[FTW395]

Destroying a universe regardless of its size (granted we destroy the space-time) gives us a low 2-C rating or 4-D, so shouldn't destroying a multiverse regardless of its size be 5-D? And actually our current rating at High 2-A should be 6-D?

For example Mr mxyzptlk exists beyond a finite multiverse (iirc), yet he's rated as 5-D which according to this wiki is for characters beyond an infinite multiverse. Now I know it was stated that he's a 5-Dimensional imp, but still doesn't it conflict with our definition of 5-D?

 

[TheMightyRegulator]

Mr. Mxyzptlk is stated to be a 5-D being, and DC has a cosmology of infinite universes (in most continuities).

Destroying a universe regardless of its size (granted we destroy the space-time) gives us a low 2-C rating or 4-D

If this was true the rating High 3-A wouldn't exist.

Also, pocket realms are still a thing.

 

[FTW395]

If this was true the rating High 3-A wouldn't exist.

What? Destroying a universe's space/time continuum gives you a Low 2-C rating even if the Universe isn't infinitely large. Also look at my previous post again, I edited it but I guess you didn't see it.

 

[Saikou_The_Lewd_King]

Well High 3-A exists for infinite 3D too, but that's beside the point.

Although I think FTW meant that the universe doesn't need to be infinite to be Low 2-C

 

[FTW395]

Well High 3-A exists for infinite 3D too, but that's beside the point.
Although I think FTW meant that the universe doesn't need to be infinite to be Low 2-C

Indeed the universe needs to be "universe-sized" for one to possibly get a Low 2-C rating by destroying it. I guess with this you could argue that for a High 2-A rating one needs to destroy a "multiverse-sized" multiverse, which is an infinitely large multiverse.

 

[TheMightyRegulator]

What? Destroying a universe's space/time continuum gives you a Low 2-C rating even if the Universe isn't infinitely large.

It still needs to be a universe of significant size to be regarded as Low 2-C.

You can be an 11 dimensional being and there still only existing a normal space-time continuum. It only messes with the tiering system when the entities of this level of power are showed to display feats on much lower levels.

 

[Primaris_Brian]

Universe is usually has fix (our own)universe size on various of fiction while multiverse is not since it can consist from couple of universes to infinity number of them.

 

[Antvasima]

Well, we may or may not adjust the distinction between 3-A and Low 2-C in the future. This is one of those cases when fictional concepts (timelines) seem to be in conflict with science (all of universal space-time being an inseparable 4-D unit).

Anyway, Multiverses are usually portrayed as 4-D universes strung along a 5-D axis, but even an infinite number of them would take extremely limited 5-D space, which is why we keep High 2-A separate for comparatively large 5-D entities.