2-a question

[Xxiaa]

If a higher plane of existence is said to be ungoverned by the rules of science. Rules of science accounting for a 2-A cosmology. Would this support low 1-c?

 

[Experiment12]

Here I do not understand your question.
If what you mean is how to get Low 1-C then this will be systematic.

Low 2-C <-> 2-A <-> Low 1-C

As far as I know Low 1-C cannot be obtained scientifically because of the difficulty of proof, but if there is a gap between Reality> Fiction it can become Low 1-C.

Higher Plane (Reality) > 2-A (Fiction) with such a Gap, will make it Ontological Superiorty, automatically becoming Low 1-C.

I'm a little confused with your question, can it be fixed?

 

[Xxiaa]

Here I do not understand your question.
If what you mean is how to get Low 1-C then this will be systematic.

Low 2-C <-> 2-A <-> Low 1-C

As far as I know Low 1-C cannot be obtained scientifically because of the difficulty of proof, but if there is a gap between Reality> Fiction it can become Low 1-C.

Higher Plane (Reality) > 2-A (Fiction) with such a Gap, will make it Ontological Superiorty, automatically becoming Low 1-C.

I'm a little confused with your question, can it be fixed?

What I’m more so asking is, if a verse has a 2-A cosmology (infinite universes infinite possibilities etc) and the science of the world is 2-A accounting for infinite universes etc but there’s a plane of existence that is ungoverned by the scientific laws of a 2-A multiverse, would this support the idea of the plane being low 1-c.

Maybe I didn’t word it right again but hopefully this makes sense

 

[Xxiaa]

Bump

 

[Wikisource]

Not enough proof, it could be 1 plane independent of the cosmology 2A you say.

 

[ImmortalDread]

No, when interpreted to the fullest extent, this serves as evidence that the condition of cosmology is not constrained by laws.

 

[ExSENNA]

No, it can mean that realm is unaffected by laws physics or whatever that governs other parts of 2-A cosmology. To get to Low 1-C you need ontological qualitative superiority over a Low 2-C structure, just being ungovernable is vague and not quantifiable in terms of its ontology

 

[Xxiaa]

No, when interpreted to the fullest extent, this serves as evidence that the condition of cosmology is not constrained by laws.

Sorry can you explain more? So if a higher plane isn’t constrained by 2-A laws or physics etc, it’s still just 2-A? I am confused sorry

 

[ExSENNA]

Sorry can you explain more? So if a higher plane isn’t constrained by 2-A laws or physics etc, it’s still just 2-A? I am confused sorry

Basically 2-A structure is 4D, its "laws and physics" that governs it would also be 4D, a "higher plane" that is unbound by such laws would still be 4D without further context. a 4D structure that is unaffected by "laws and physics" that governs other 4D structures

 

[ImmortalDread]

Sorry can you explain more? So if a higher plane isn’t constrained by 2-A laws or physics etc, it’s still just 2-A? I am confused sorry

Why would you assume the cosmology is higher just because it has unique nature state? It's being unbounded by physics does not mean the cosmology is simply higher.