• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

2-A question

But multiple things are better than one no? Why would the verse needs to show that they are better?
 
Only if there are proof that the other 2-A structures are they infinitely superior to the previous ones.
 
But two infinities are better than one no?
Nuke low 1-C it is then-
 
Using verses that have long-time mods supporting them as examples is a big bad idea.
 
No. You need proof that destroying 2 multiverses is more powerful than just one. Like, an in universe explanation.
 
That's like saying 1+1 =1
I hate infinite
Why can't every verse just be 9-A?
 
It can only grant above baseline 2-A if there's an in-universe explanation and context that proves it to need more energy than affectng a standard 2-A multiverse.
 
azontr said:
Yeah but infinite isn't finite dude, don't treat it like a normal number with normal mathematical rules lol
Click to expand...
What if I just do-
But seriously but doesn't it mean that there is infinity, we add another infinity to it
Wouldn't that mean infinity but bigger since it has other set of infinity added to the previous set, thus increasing the number no?
 
Not even remotely. There's a note on the Tiering System FAQ, just read it.
 
Orange said:
What if I just do-
But seriously but doesn't it mean that there is infinity, we add another infinity to it
Wouldn't that mean infinity but bigger since it has other set of infinity added to the previous set, thus increasing the number no?
Click to expand...
What the ****? Lol no. That isn't how infinite works. In the case of 2-A Multiverses, there needs to be in story evidence that destroying multiple 2-A Multiverses requires more power, which there usually is.
 
DaReaperMan said:
Because D&D is Bambu's verse, so it's given special treatment.
Click to expand...
Duly noted.

Special treatment in this case is hundreds of hours of work hours put towards it by myself and the other people on the verse. That is to say, Tllmbrg, Qawsedf234, Xulrev, Dragonstitch, Udlmaster, and those who are no longer as active- Foggysniper, LephyrtheRevanchist, Azzy, and so on.

Y'all disappoint me.

As for the above question- yes, but not considerably. You are "above baseline" 2-A but only slightly in the grand scope of VS Battles. Mind that this only really affects AP and hax from "baseline" creatures affects you fine (assuming you have no resistance, of course).
 
Mr._Bambu said:
Duly noted.

Special treatment in this case is hundreds of hours of work hours put towards it by myself and the other people on the verse. That is to say, Tllmbrg, Qawsedf234, Xulrev, Dragonstitch, Udlmaster, and those who are no longer as active- Foggysniper, LephyrtheRevanchist, Azzy, and so on.

Y'all disappoint me.

As for the above question- yes, but not considerably. You are "above baseline" 2-A but only slightly in the grand scope of VS Battles. Mind that this only really affects AP and hax from "baseline" creatures affects you fine (assuming you have no resistance, of course).
Click to expand...
I was literally joking lol
 
Such jokes tend to be serious and even more often reek of bad intentions. But fair enough.

In any case, I think OP is answered.
 
Mr._Bambu said:
You are "above baseline" 2-A but only slightly in the grand scope of VS Battles
Click to expand...
Well technically you aren't for AP anymore. My overconfidence is what caused the change to be applied in the first place kek.

However recently I've run into someone who has an interesting approach on infinity and his way of going about it (basically applying traditional maths to it) causes less contradictions than what we currently do, since we do still have stuff like above baseline High 3-A for instance.
 
Mr._Bambu said:
Such jokes tend to be serious and even more often reek of bad intentions. But fair enough.

In any case, I think OP is answered.
Click to expand...
Look mate, I've been observing Reaper for some time now and you shouldn't take about 80-90% of what he says seriously
 
I mean it was crossed out which 9.999 times out of 10 indicates its at least not serious and is most likely a joke

Especially since I kind of know a bit of the pain as a Warhammer Fantasy supporter, whenever we make a profile we have to go through just about every damn army book pertaining to the race in order to fill it out. And every book they have(I'm looking at you Gotrek Gurnison)
 
doesn't scaling chains make you above baseline? like:

character A is 100 times stronger than character B
character B is 100 times stronger than character C
character C is baseline 2-A thus character A is 200 times baseline?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

TheHedgememe
Regarding Low 2-C structures being 2-D in comparison to a larger space
Replies
2
Views
571
TheHedgememe
TheHedgememe
SkyBlade6635
Qualitative supériority question
Replies
2
Views
366
SkyBlade6635
SkyBlade6635
ArachDusa
What's the difference between Low 2-C and 2-C?
Replies
6
Views
1K
StrymULTRA
StrymULTRA
TheOrangeGuy09
Would destroying multiple universes be Tier 2, even if evidence says nothing about time?
Replies
5
Views
783
SuperSonicTL
SuperSonicTL
AppleMaker
Are those feats/statements calculable/quantifiable or not?
Replies
11
Views
686
IDK3465
IDK3465
Back
Top