Demon King Daimao Discussion Rule

[DontTalkDT]

There were jokes about this happening for a while and now is the time. Yeah, I'm proposing a discussion rule for Ichiban Ushiro no Daimao.

The specific debate I would like to not repeat are arguments regarding the reality-fiction hierarchies of the verse and the rating of characters scaling to them.

We had numerous debates about it (here, here, here, here, here & here. I think there might have been one or two more, but things are badly tagged) and as we see in the title of that last thread, there being lots of attempts has basically become a joke by now.
Many of those threads had really long debates. Between them they had 1250 posts of debate. That's quite a lot for a relatively obscure verse like this.

Recent debates had less posts, as I try to keep things repeat free and, quite frankly, my patience to have this debate again and again is running thin.
I would like to avoid just one day getting so frustrated with this that I just wave the debate through for the sake of not having to have it anymore (sadly, that has happened before...).
Hence I propose the discussion rule.

As for the specific formulation:

• Do not attempt to downgrade the Tier 1 ratings of Ichiban Ushiro no Daimao characters. The nature and details regarding the Reality-Fiction Hierarchies of the verse have been frequently debated before (e.g. here, here, here, here, here & here), with various pieces of evidence compiled here. Debates regarding the topic have grown repetitive and tiresome.

 

[Deceived3596]

Agree.

The fact this topic has been debated this many times, with the counter arguments always being the same rehashed, debunked arguments over and over again should be credence enough to make a discussion rule until new evidence is provided.

 

[StorytellingDemonKing]

I agree with this. I myself didn't even want to participate in the latest thread besides agreeing with DT and moving on. It has gotten really tiresome with the same repeated arguments. In fact, I would suggest having solid ratings considering hierarchies, in general, have failed to be downgraded in this verse (and, the same arguments are used anyway) but I'm guessing that would be off-topic here.

 

[Antvasima]

I think that this seems uncontroversial to apply. Should I send a notification message to our wiki administrators?

 

[DontTalkDT]

Should I send a notification message to our wiki administrators?

Yeah, I suppose they should take a look.

 

[Antvasima]

@DarkDragonMedeus @SomebodyData @Celestial_Pegasus @Wokistan @Ultima_Reality @Mr._Bambu @Elizhaa @Qawsedf234 @ByAsura @Sir_Ovens @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Abstractions @LordGriffin1000 @Colonel_Krukov @SamanPatou @GyroNutz

Does this seem fine to you?

 

[Damage3245]

I'm not familiar with the character but if it has been as frequently debated and debunked as that, then this seems fine.

 

[Celestial_Pegasus]

Agree, i have causally observed this same topic many times, ridiculous at this point.

 

[The_Axiom_of_Virgo]

I know little about the verse in question but the incessant downgrade CRTs perpetuated by misinformation and repeated circular arguments isn't helpful nor constructive for the wiki.

So consider me agreeing to the discussion rule. In a way there's kinda a hidden general discussion rule when a verse reaches a certain threshold of upgrade/downgrade CRTs that use the same or similar repeated arguments.

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

I agree with this given I have heard DontTalkDT having to constantly repeat himself.

 

[DontTalkDT]

Alrighty, everyone that had an opinion seems to agree and 48 hours are over. So I will apply this now and then the thread can be closed.

Edit: Things were applied.