This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Yes, I think as long as you are not able to go to any **** website after clicking on an image and nothing of that sort is shown in said image, it should be fine.
Well, as I pointed out earlier, people did make threads for certain topics where sexualized pictures were posted. And we kept them open as long as images were within the reasonable boundaries. I literally linked to some of those threads earlier. They were ultimately closed only because people...
Hi everybody!
7 years ago, on this very day I signed up on this wiki. Today marks the completion of my 7 long years here and the starting of 8th. It's such a long time yet it seems as if it was only yesterday. Coincidentally, today on behalf of all the bureaucrats, I bring you this.
This guy...
Care to point out how many times this happened? I only know of 2 incidents before in my 7 years that were brought up officially and in both incidents it was brushed aside by our staff members unanimously. I can link to them if needed. And I'd say it's pretty less number in 2555 days. I wouldn't...
So we are back to "what some people say elsewhere" which we have already discussed sufficiently. It's starting to go in circles.
Will avoid posting unless I see anything new or have anything new to add.
Said stuff hasn't had any effect (neither positive nor negative) in our PR in the past decade so I think that line of thought is even more ineffectual than the previous one.
And I wasn't saying that I am trying to force a rejection. That's how threads work. If a proposal for change doesn't...
According to the tally Agnaa posted above there isn't a mandate to force this change. In such a case we do nothing and continue to follow the status quo.
However, in the interest of making the currently followed rules clearer, I can try to suggest the following:
Our current rules say this:
Do...
Yet the thread is not about it. If you think aging up of the character was the main issue, why isn't it mentioned in the OP and why didn't anybody else (except Bambu) talk about it throughout the thread? Of course, I am ready to have that conversation if it comes up, but at least going by the...
@CloverDragon03 I feel that something that might be objectively correct for one user can also be objectively incorrect for another. In that case, I'd say either one has a bad sense of judgment in the other's eyes regarding this topic. We'll just have to be happy with agreeing to disagree rather...
Well there are a lot of users who disagree with a lot of things on this wiki. I also have my fair share of problems with a lot many things here. I know 90% people do. That's not uncommon. Obviously we can't make everyone happy. We have hundreds of people with hundreds of opinions.
I have...
But this isn't about a single banner or what people elsewhere think of it. If the banner goes, so will several other pfps. We are discussing the general rules not one particular banner.
Eh! I think that's a bit off. Nobody I have ever interacted with thinks like we are an oversexualized wiki. I have seen similar or more on that point in other wikis as well. Actually this is quite common across the board. In 10 years of this wiki being alive I don't remember this topic being...
I think fandom's rules are fine as they are. Fandom is also PG13, why should we have different rules? Everybody has already seen bikinis in beaches or in beach episodes of PG13 anime, etc. We can't protect anybody from something they already know. I think anything more than the current fandom...
Let me be more technical.
It is impossible to know the exact age of a character drawn by an artist unless they have written it in their drawing, that stands true for any fanart drawn differently than the original. But generally you could tell by looking at them whether they are grown adults or...
It doesn't matter what prompted this thread. We are speaking generally here. I see this as completely separate issue because a lot of people who take offense to issue 1 might not take offense to issue 2 or vice versa. Just to quote an example here, the person who created the thread has stated...
No. This thread is not about restricting aged up characters. All the discussion that took place in this thread, apart from the last few comments, has been about women in general in revealing clothes. I see the aged up characters issue as an entirely different tangent. And if we want to discuss...
Shouldn't it be "exceptions can be given to genuinely helpful people" or "exceptions can be given for genuinely helpful revisions"?
But yes, your suggestion looks good to me.
So this is that unfinished thread (we did discuss the rule but completed it). I know this is very late to bump this but I agree that people can still help if they are banned for other reasons but are generally helpful. But if it is proven that someone is using a proxy to copy-paste their exact...
Don't we have rules that it isn't allowed to copy paste arguments from a banned user? I think we already put down some rules last time when it happened with Weekly. There's no real punishment for the banned user if they can still interact by having a proxy account be their mouthpiece word-to-word.
I think a lot has been posted above for the staff to go through. Personally I agree with Bambu for now. In case it is found that a false report is made to deliberately frame somebody, I think it is malicious enough to warrant a punishment. But please avoid posting any other comments, so that the...
People don't realize that vice shout is nothing but expending energy. Just like expending energy through ki blasts like Goku did against Hit. And shouldn't be much different even if it is done via a punch. Goku probably doesn't need to scream.