This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
He literally has claws on his outfit and cuts people with them. He is seen doing this in the videos you provide. I didn't make a claim he was doing it with some external tool: I think he cut them with his hands. The provided video was already looked at, the kid is in pieces but it isn't...
Some parts of this need work.
Summary has grammatical issues (missing commas and stuff, small business).
LS is unfounded. It presumes a specific way of removing limbs, rather than the more likely explanation of cutting them off (which has no LS implications).
Durability section states "can...
Mechanics do not dissuade us from using statements, the latter tends to take priority. I don't think this thread is an instance of only valuing game mechanics, though- much of the arguments in the OP hail from rendered cutscenes (like people holding the "black hole"). Furthermore, this just...
Ah.
Yeah, I vaguely recall that. It's still a 2023 offense so I personally still feel a light ban is all that is necessary, acknowledging that more offenses in the future would obviously yield greater bans.
I'd be content to grant leniency as well, for the record, although given that his complaint seems to be that this is to be regarded as a negative thing at all, I'm uncertain he would accept. It's his choice, though.
Is the desired outcome that I burst through the doors like Aragorn in that one scene and change the outcome lol
Like. Either I disagree and am the one against many, or agree and am the one amongst many. Either way, it's a smidgeon late- though it is kind of you to at least offer a final...
A respectable addition. I note that a case would need to be made for each person, linking to specific posts and whatnot.
You have a single report on the Tracker, compared to Ryzen's two; for the rest, Hellscream also has one, Adam has none, and Arcker has a staggering 5 (including a ban for...
I've read through the thread. I want to reiterate that I don't really like Genshin and don't really want to be called to work on it- I'm not putting it on the blacklist or anything, but I state this here to discourage my participation from being taken as a "this is Bambu's verse!" thing, since...
If you believe it to be the case that it harms others, I trust your judgement enough to allow it to fly; 9-B for general monsters is satisfactory to me.
is this the wrong thread or what
In light of this being from two years ago, I do think the current report constitutes a ban but not a particularly long one- my knee-jerk recommendation is that two weeks feels appropriate.
This is inappropriate but not really warning worthy in of itself.
First...
Bloodborne, the platform sorta goes without saying. It was in late 2016, maybe early 2017, and I can distinctly remember physically exhausting myself on the first boss because I leapt from my chair and was nervously reacting to every single attack.
If other monsters can provably survive it (and it's not for a game mechanical reason, like monsters not harming one another), then I don't mind that scaling.
You're right, I did misread- I read both as Steel Guardian. I still stand by the idea of not scaling random enemies to the bosses (that is to say, you mentioned a 9-B feat, and I think it would be better to use that). Still, rescind my statements made out of misunderstanding.
The first two have a lot just pulled directly from the tabletop, but aye, it isn't 1:1. I think they would have liked to, though, and that BG3 just actually achieved that.
Henry: Looks fine.
Valtiel: Also fine.
Siam: As this is a larger threat monster than most, I would propose that other characters that aren't 1:1 comparable get "At least 9-C, likely 9-B" rather than flat-out 9-B (as Siam should get).
Bogeyman: I think the rating for Bogeyman/Wheelman is...
If you cannot stand to be disagreed with without accusing everyone of being biased against you, you will never be satisfied in a place that encourages viewpoints from all sides. This is a fact of life that you will necessarily mature into. Now, as you've extended your rage into the RVRT, I will...
@Tempestdragon6 You were told in the thread to stop, and you didn't, so I tell you again, this time as a formal warning: knock it off. Play nice or don't play. Even if you're agitated, it's better for all if you just don't post aggro message- it can only possibly serve to make the situation...
I think there is a significant difference in how poorly you act compared to how poorly Tdjwo acts, and your actions appear less motivated by personal bias. Thus, I was slow to accept punishment (however small) for both of you. As Agnaa suggested a smaller ban for you, I think that aligns with my...
I lack the time on hand to offer a lengthy post of my thoughts: I think Agnaa's stance is basically sensible. I'll sign off on a warning or light punishment for Tdjwo, hesitantly for Nanaya as well.
Hypercanon is a meaningless phrase.
It isn't fanfiction as a whole, collaborative fiction sort of fills a border realm in terms of being purely original and purely derivative.
this may be the single most suspicious scan ever conceived, down to heavy-handed powerscaling dialogue to a blogspot watermark included
I contacted a friend and at least confirmed the scan says what is proposed it says. I'm hesitant to sign off on something I cannot personally confirm the...
The question, then, becomes to what extent we wish to dissuade people from reporting staff members, if it can be interpreted as an attack. Obviously such things can be weaponized, and in the case of random beef between these two it lends itself to that interpretation, but consider the opposite...
That which is preferred is not identical to that which is required.
Not necessarily newer arguments- but old votes would have been invalidated, at least, yeah.
I suppose one might say this was just an irrelevant tidbit stated by you, but it was added as a matter of substance to the report. That said, while I consider this an argument made from madness, my post is to the royal you, not you in particular. It has been a consistent trend in this thread...
For the record, I agree with removal.
This is correct, nor does anyone have to wait for anyone else. No user, not even Ant, has to be waited for to have a thread go on: no thread must wait for another's permission to finish, so long as it does otherwise fulfill the requirements to finish. In...