This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
i think it was on a thread when people said artoria (aka OG seibah) could defeat dudes like God Spawn and trion juggernaut, one dude even went as far as to say even galactus could get rekt by her...it was pretty much "muh vaporisation reeeee" thing
PS: the seibah used on the thread was the...
>the moment when evaluating the context no longer matters in a verse where things aren't always what they seem to be (even though some upgrades were rejected in the past because the thing the character said wasn't literal).
oh lawd
...
well, i'm not really sure about astroboy or applejack (have never watched the mlp series), but in the case meliodas and saber fight each other i think mel would win (since it is bloddlusted it is assault mode meliodas) as his stats are superior.
>bu bu but what about her sword
>excalibah...
the light beams of excalibur vaporizes the target (and utterly destroy it if the dude/chick isn't strong enough to tank it or his/her durability or regen isn't high enough). there's really no hax attach to it other than the common misuse of the word atomization, which is to reduce something to...
atomization:to split into many sections, groups, factions, etc.; fragmentize / to reduce to atoms
the word's, which was taken from the VN, meaning isn't the destruction of atoms but rather reduce the target to atoms. In this case those with high regen can come back if they get hit by the...
this, the vn just states how it "touches"the atoms that constitute the being that receives the attack, if the contrary were true then we're right back at the classical "doesn't matter if your durability or regen is incredibly high (heracles, Juggernaut, blackheart you name it) it will kill you...
like the other anon said, it was the one with ryuoko where the decisive factor was the false atomic destruction (the same thing happened with the one where boros was the enemy, that the guy once one of his limbs was destroyed by the excaliblast he wouldn't be able to regenerate)... something...
exactly what i thought, but most people on "saber vs _____" threads tend to go : "well, her sword destroys atoms (when in reality it only vaporizes) therefore the dude/chick fighting saber is done for no matter how incredibly high his/her regen is, the use of those two words as though they were...
i'm kinda new to the wiki, but i read some threads on "saber vs___" and in one a dude pointed out that people were using atomozing and "atomic destruction" interchangably when they're not the same thing, yes her excaliblast is powerful but not powerful enough to destroy atoms, you can vaporize...