This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
If they could swing a sword a SoL they wouldn't need to become energy to do so.
I mean, same core issue. Even if they are SoL the PC still doesn't scale to them in a FTL capacity.
You're close there, but to quote the FAQ
To use mathmatics, only "Real" or "Irrational" sets are an uncountable infinite
So in this case, you'd only get Aleph-1 / An Uncountable Infinity at the Real Number Stage or if you can prove that universes work on irrational number logic (which I don't...
The point is that in set theory there's different infinite groups that you can compare stuff to
A set of infinite natural numbers can fit into a set of integers that fit into a set of any rational number which fits into a set of real numbers.
For it to be Aleph-1 you have to have a set of all...
Yes. Because the example given is a 2-A structure that branches infinitely and who's branched paths also branch infinitely. A timeline branching infinitely by itself is just 2-A and nothing more.
I don't think MWI would be uncountable in most circumstances. Because it's only a Low 2-C space...
The thing you quoted was for canonical alternate universes. What you posted wasn't an alternate universe but an adaptation of a work being different from the original.
For point 3 to be valid you'd have to show that the anime is a canonical parallel world.
I believe so, since a timeline is generally just an uncountable infinite nu.mber of 3-A snapshots. Without a second temporal axis, the only consistent way I see replicating such a thing is a recursive amount of 2-A space stacked together.
Not going by the FAQ
Just housing infinite universes is a 2A structure with an insignificant 5th Axis per our rules, as you can house an infinite number of seperate spaces with just irrational numbers. 5D requires an uncountable infinite size difference and the evidence you mentioned wouldn't...
The +1 Dimension is time. The greater space housing those timelines is just 4D with an insignificant 5th Dimensional Axis unless proven otherwise. You'd only default to Low 1-C if they were 4+1 universes.
No, since the universes are 3D suspended in a 4th Dimensional construct. You would need to prove that the universes have 4 spatial dimensions for the void to be Low 1-C.
Transcending the space would, but just the bubbles doesn't.
An anime key isn't allowable, since that's mixing canons. Its either one or the other and generally unless its some radically different story anime profiles aren't useable.
That's why I included the art. His entire torso has also been replaced like her. It's just that his cyberware is more aesthetically pleasing than Songbirds.
I think they're both the same. It's just that Songbird is tapping into the Blackwall for her hacks, which are more powerful than normal...
The rules can be read here. To quote them
Just having slightly different story beats or wording isn't enough to justify the existence of a profile. You have to show difference in story arcs like in GT or alternate material like with Saint Seiya.
Minor thing, but I found out about concept art regarding Agent Mosley from Netwatch, so he really does have the same gear as Songbird. Though now I wonder why they used this gear rather than the RavenTech Wiseman since you're seemingly replacing nearly as much of your body with chrome. Though I...
I agreed with you, which is why the rest of my comment was about emphasizing his in-character mindset and scaling inconsistencies of treating Mark as always being Low 6-B.
I'm saying that Mark being thrown back isn't a scaling justification on its own. Though I guess ultimately that's not...
Not a tier in of itself, but acknowledging that he (and some of the other heroes) don't use 100% of their strength all the time. If Mark isn't punching a Viltrumite with his full force then he's not punching Octoboss with it either.
Being knocked back/stunned is pretty common in fiction. As an...
I think it makes more sense for Mark to be "7-A, Low 6-B when not holding back". Makes it more consistent with the show as well.
It could but ngl I wouldn't use Black Hole feats in fiction as the primary LS justification without supporting feats first.