• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Qawsedf234
Reaction score
17,432

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • hi, would you mind evaluating tier 1(1C-H1C) thread? it's been 2 months and noone yet adressed it

    thread:

    this question isn't really for any verse on the wiki nor for any CRTs but wouldn't MWI explicitly working on a non collapsing wave function make the multiverse low 1-C since all possible outcomes of a quantum event would exist?
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    Of the three or four MWI ends you can get, that is the Low 1-C option. Since you'd get an uncountable infinite state of universes.
    Can you unlock this profile so I can apply these revisions?
    Can you please take a look at this CRT? staff input is needed. And thanks in advance.
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    I have work to do. When I'm free with that I'll try and dedicate enough time to comment in the thread.
    YmTheSuper
    YmTheSuper
    Thanks
    Hey Qawsedf
    Can you take a look at this CRT and give us your approval?
    • Like
    Reactions: ProfectusInfinity
    Ss3micah
    Ss3micah
    Hey Qawsedf
    Thanks for the comment and analysis you shared in the CRT.

    I now am going to need to make a few Revision changes to the thread regarding your input but before I finalize everything… can we at least agree to a “possibly” rating of using the earth as a star sized planet?

    Possibly​

    Should be used to list a statistic for a character with some basis, but inconclusive due to the justification being vague or non-definitive. The probability of the justification in question for being reliable should be notable, but mild. This term should be used sparingly.

    That being said, I think the conditions apply here. Like you said it can fall either way so I think a “possibly rating” for star sized planet is not unreasonable. Do you agree?
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    I think you have enough for possibly.
    Ss3micah
    Ss3micah
    Alright thanks 😊
    Hi, Qawsedf
    Could you please give input here? 🙏
    It's quite similar to the Low 1-C LN upgrade you evaluated about a week ago, except its more straightforward due to there already being an almost direct statement for retroactive destruction (or destruction as an entire space-time).
    Thanks.
    Hello

    I have a question

    I've created a sandbox for a Verse Page and Character profile which is not has in vs battle wiki page. Main Character and verse's character culcultion has been accepted by the Culc group. And a Thread Moderator check the ability used using on the profile.

    Additional information:- the Verse not go higher than 5-A and verse's does not have any controversal hax like concept manipulation or like that's.
    Or series end already.

    So I have a question about before publishing the page in vs battle wiki what I need to do is there any rule on that.

    Thank's
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    For a verse and character page you usually make a CRT about it so you have historical evidence that everything was accepted and that the wording is fine.

    After that you'd just upload them to the site.
    Can I get your opinion here? It's very simple and just needs one more approval

    Are two votes enough from the administrators to make a thread accepted?
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    Unless it's a Tier 2/1 upgrade or a popular verse, then two is typically enough.
    Could you please 🙏 check this out


    Please close this thread. Thank you.
    Can you check this out? I just need one more vote to pass this off.

    You really only need to read this short comment, as it presents the biggest antifeat, but the rest of the thread is there.
    Hello, I hope you're having a great day. I would appreciate it if you could check this crt thank you in advance!
    could you please check out this crt? thank you in advance!
    Since you helped with the last crt, could you clear this one also
    A continuation of the thread you previously contributed to. Please express your opinion here too.
    Hi Qawsedf, if you have the time could you please look over this CRT?

    Hello. When you are not busy, could you give your opinion on this CRT? Thanks in advance. 🙏
    Could you please check out this thread?
    🙏
    Hello Qawseed I have a question regarding duality and binary oppositions.

    would a verse what works on the concept of Boolean Algebra aka logic gates have a form of dual systems and or duality. so, for example if the number 0 is (false) then the number 1 is (true). the explanation to this reminded me of how Idealistic Nonexistence is phrases on the fandom page.

    if it does can you please explain why or why not?
    Hey, this is pretty straightforward and short.

    Hello! If you have time, can you check this out?
    Qaws what happened to this thread
    Hello! I had a question, and I honestly do not know who to ask. Can you answer this question from me in this thread? Basically about whether the things there qualify for conceptual manipulation.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top