• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Mr. Bambu
Reaction score
29,524

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • I have many responsibilities on this site, and this means I only wear each hat for as long as is necessary. Therefore, you may leave CRT/calc eval/whatever requests, and I will try to get to it, but understand that my time is limited and I'm normally already tapped for some wiki policy matter or maintaining the wiki management threads or handling account issues for users who never seem to get things right. Low priority requests include tiershit, particularly active verses, and discussions with a lot of active staff voices already present. I'm not saying "no" but I probably won't get to them. If I don't reply, smart money says it won't be me to get to it. Sorry.

    answer my question pls cuz im getting loads of varying answers.. (including 1-A)
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I will afford you an earnest explanation.

    One feels as though you waste your time and the time of the staff. I willingly entered the first CRT you asked me to enter, laid down my thoughts sincerely, and I was told it was all pointless, as the content of the CRT was not really up for discussion. It was a waste of my limited time on this website, where I could have assisted another, to engage in a verse that creates literally pointless CRTs. As such, I have been directly ignoring Cookie Run CRTs.

    This has, I think, been a Wise Move. You have since deposited countless more Cookie Run CRTs. I do not believe a litany of CRTs are necessary for any verse receiving less frequent and substantive updates than the MCU, certainly not a mobile game gacha. It is my belief that a great number of CRTs are an indication of a verse too fascinated by change, with too little respect for the time of those involved. Major problems with a verse can be handled with less CRTs.

    I further note that you now grasp at 1-A for cosmological purposes, while I already gave my opinion on the cosmology on the very first CRT you asked me to look at. I was told my input was more or less meaningless at that time, and have no interest in reaffirming it.

    Do have a nice day. I genuinely hope you get help on your CRTs, but am unwilling to do so myself at this time.
    Ar1216789
    Ar1216789
    Okay, sorry for annoying you.
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    Don't be. I should have said as much earlier. Good luck.
    Could you please leave a comment on this thread? Thanks.
    Hello, could you please evaluate this CRT when you've got time?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    is this my punishment for speaking on a FNAF thread

    I won't do it again, promise
    Just a question how many agreements does it take (i am talking about abstract existence type 2) to have a thread accepted?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    Controversial verse: 3

    Otherwise: 2

    The staff must be of a position that can offer formal evaluations- that means thread moderators, administrators, and bureaucrats.
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    if you have two agrees then why do you need me
    1000TonsofFun
    1000TonsofFun
    I was advised that I might need more people’s judgment in the Speckles the Tarbosaurus thread. If both are ok with two then thats my mistake. I’m sorry for taking your time
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I see, I looked through it; the proposal that DDM accepted isn't the proposal Duedate accepted.

    Then yeah, you'll either need Duedate to sign off on the new proposal, or someone else. I'll try check it out.
    Hello, can I get your vote in this thread? Thanks in advance.
    Hi, could you please check out this CRT?
    It's about removing a faulty calc that's not even being used in the characters profile from the verse page.
    Hello, I'd like permission to make a staff discussion on the topic of FRA the legitimacy of matches that get fra trained.
    Hi, could you grant me permission to write a single comment under this thread?

    Hello, sir! I recently opened a Q/A for Deepwoken, and your feedback was very important to me, so thank you again. If you don’t mind, is there any issue with me being listed as a representative for Deepwoken on the VSBW fandom?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    What do you mean?
    Shiedaisthepeak
    Shiedaisthepeak
    If I couldn't express myself, please bear with me. In vsbw, there are usually representatives of certain universes. For example:
    https://cdn.**********.com/attachments/1280645307566264341/1292590378368897116/image.png?ex=67044a19&is=6702f899&hm=992b3db81a26cd53129e7c1137161a50a2c49f5ee5bb23e3984841d03a3eb947&
    Could I be the representative of the Deepwoken universe in a similar way?
    I constantly consult with you, and I hope I'm not bothering you. Thank you for always answering me!🙏
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    You can add yourself as a Knowledgeable Member, yes.
    Once again, I’m really sorry for bothering you so much, but this is important to me. I would really appreciate it if you could take a look.
    Hello! I opened a CRT for Flash that I believe is an important development. I would appreciate it if you could take a look and share your comments. Thank you in advance!
    Hello.

    I saw you in the last Genshin Impact thread. Can I please have this one about Black Holes checked out when you have the time?

    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I don't guarantee anything, but I will try.
    LordJoshMeh
    LordJoshMeh
    Boop. I know you're busy so I boop to remind you if you're still interested.
    Hello Mr. Bambu, it's me again (sorry for bothering you so much). I'm about to make an important development for a universe I love, and I opened a Q/A for this. Your feedback is very important to me, thank you in advance!
    Bambu, mind later checking a CRT that would be relevant to the leading author questions? Because to know if it's count as leading or no. Since I do have talked with other admins that something like Q&As or interviews are allowed
    Hi, can you check out this thread.

    If you, perhaps, could check this thread whenever you have some time, it would be appreciated! Thank you in advance!

    Quick question, Bambu, a character strangling someone until passing out counts as AP, LS or both?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    LS, I believe. Breaking bones, which might be involved, is AP.
    Tomfer
    Tomfer
    Hey Bambu,

    I was hoping you could look at this CRT?

    Btw as for the LMK characters resistance to spatial and time manip, you dont need to remove the ones that tanked the Samadhi fire as it was already approved that you gain such resists from it. You can just change the references

    You can however remove the resists from characters that haven't resisted the Samadhi Fire like Azure
    Sdjlakjh
    Sdjlakjh
    Also I would like for you to join in a LMK crt addressing the author stating that LMK characters are beyond physical laws
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I don't know what LMK is, nor anything about what you're talking about. Without some context, I can't be of any help. I will state plainly that author statements gained via request is unusable- that clarification you asked for can't be used.
    Internet access is pretty much in the toilet at the moment, and it seems it will be for a few days. Do not expect assistance here.
    ey,can i ask you a question?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I was not expecting that to be the question.

    It has many of the same issues as the other one. For example, rather than list his P&A as a tabber, you have "in his true form he gets:", which isn't strictly outside the policy but is weird. There's tons of places where spaces should be where they are not. Your Tier section is in "quotation marks", as if the page itself doubts whether the character is actually that tier. There's other minor grammatical things (using "an" where it should be "a" and vice versa, names not being capitalized, etc) as well.

    On a more strict set of issues, your evidence for Wall level does not link to a character destroying the door or the calculation for that feat- it should link to both. By a similar measure, it cites the ability to "run into walls without dying" as wall level, when this is verifiably not the case.

    It needs a great deal of cleanup, basically. Manageable, but absolutely necessary.
    Homie890
    Homie890
    hmm,i see,thanks for the explaination chief
    (kinda wacky on how,even this being the sixth or fifth sandbox i make for faith characters,it still has the same mistakes as the first one)
    Homie890
    Homie890
    added the 9-b dura justificatives,changed the quotation marks into {}},and fixed a few of the grammar mistakes.
    Hello could you help evaluate this CRT?
    Am wondering since my CRT recently finished just debunking these arguments? Also isn't their a rule that prevents the same arguments and scans for being used within 3 months of getting debunked?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    Am wondering since my CRT recently finished just debunking these arguments?
    I don't know what you mean by this.

    Also isn't their a rule that prevents the same arguments and scans for being used within 3 months of getting debunked?
    Per our Discussion Rules:

    "When creating content revisions, it is essential to ensure that the topic has not been addressed previously. Rejected content revisions cannot be resubmitted within a short period of time (typically defined as within 3 to 4 months), except in cases where a staff member has a good reason to do so (e.g. important unconsidered information, violation of site standards, or flaws in a calculation). This only applies to threads that have received extensive debate or have been rejected due to a clear conflict with the wiki's rules or standards. If a thread passes or is rejected without significant opposition, then opposition should not be restricted from making a point."
    Just a quick question.

    If Character A's ability is removed, and Character B's ability is solely reliant on that ability, do we need a new CRT to remove Character's B ability/resistance?
    Dark_Soul20189
    Dark_Soul20189
    We have been removing lots of abilities in CRTs related to instant death verse, for example, their NEP.
    But we have missed that some profiles have gained nonexistence erasure, for "erasing" that person that now has lost their NEP.

    This is just one of many such examples I could find.
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    If it is a missed ability like that, then it should be removed. Bear in mind that if it exists on a page for different reasons, you obviously need a CRT to remove it. So, be careful.
    Dark_Soul20189
    Dark_Soul20189
    Yeah, Will only focus on does, the rest will be removed with CRT's like I have been doing so far.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top