• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Mickey1940

Mickey1940

Joined
Last seen
Viewing thread UPGRADE ATTACK POTENCY 4A (GENSHIN IMPACT)
Messages
3,628
Reaction score
540

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • XXBenShapiroXx
    Dude we know the Zeno vs Hit match up is stupid, that's the point. It's to show the mods how stupid it is for Zeno not to have accepted resistances
    Mickey1940
    Mickey1940
    oh

    oh thank god

    I legit didn't realize you guys were joking, I was worried there for a bit

    Sorry about that
    Frieza_force_soldier_100
    Can you offer a vote on my match since you have been in Mr. Burns threads before?

    vsbattles.com

    Gingerbread Man vs Mr. Burns

    This fight was never finished before GBM's profile got deleted. I moved his profile to the Joke Battles Wiki. Now we can finish this fight, starting over from the beginning. The result will be added only to GBM's profile, since that's how battles involving Joke Battle profiles work. This is...
    vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
    LordGinSama
    I'm gonna personally ask you that you use paragraphs going forward. Or try not to make so many points that are essentially the same, it really does make replying to your arguments that much more difficult whenever I'm reading a large clumped together wall of text, of which a lot of the points are simply reiterating previous points that cover the same topic.


    Also the Demon Slayer Mark amp isn't accepted as 100x. Not sure where you got that from.
    View previous comments…
    Mickey1940
    Mickey1940
    It's on everyone's profiles tho
    LordGinSama
    LordGinSama
    Yeah not sure how. According to his edit history it was added randomly by a user without a CRT to remove it so I'll be making a quick CRT to remove it.
    Mickey1940
    Mickey1940
    ok, that's fine
    Agnaa
    1. I also spent a generous amount of time explaining why I think Ruby was scaled to a different calculation than the one the community for some reason generally agrees upon, as well as saying why the AP difference still didn't matter at the end of the day since Traveler was still stronger by a decent degree.
    2. "Go after" other people was literally just me asking why they voted for Ruby despite me directly addressing the debates/points in response to the Ruby supporters. I already explained in the thread that it made more sense for people to counter me instead of ignoring me and say "blank FRA" seemingly blindly. Not to mention, I wasn't harassing anyone. I said that 1 time and that's literally all I said. I didn't use any insults or inappropriate words, nor did I make anyone uncomfortable.
    3. There's a difference between self conceited and trying to defend my self in a VS debate. Apparently, the buttons I pushed were somehow related to bias, I'm assuming? I based all of my arguments on what I read on their pages, and I am a huge fan of both verses (watched RWBY since 2012, rewatched several times over the years out of boredom, AR59 in Genshin and played since launch).

    And, by the way, no, I'm not changing the way I debate in VS threads, simply because I literally didn't do a single thing wrong
    Click to expand...
    View previous comments…
    Mickey1940
    Mickey1940
    But my behavior wasn't bad. I was accused of "going after people" in the thread I posted, in a thread where rulebreaking and reports are directly addressed. Which normally wouldn't be an issue, but that makes me feel like he's accusing ME of harassment when I didn't do so
    And yes, I rechecked the thread. I said this:
    Someone else: "Ruby FRA"
    Me: "???? for what reasons? I responded to all of the points about Ruby with no response from any of the Ruby supporters"
    That's not harassment. That's me trying to understand why someone decided to vote on the exact opposite point I just decided to defend, which I further defended myself within the same thread.

    He was also accusing me of doing things that he himself did at an equal amount, that being NFL and nonstandard strategies, which is also further provided and directly addressed within the thread it happened in. While also calling me self-conceited as a response.
    As for using my own AP values, I was reading the pages on the wiki, and I watched the show. I know what happens in the show, and I know where the calculation come from. Hence, I made a conclusion based on that. I have no idea why the entire rest of the community says otherwise, since it goes directly against what the show actually depicts.

    TLDR he was essentially calling me an idiot who violated the Versus Thread Rules, which in fact I didn't do a single time.

    Removing the context from my response will make my response look completely dismissive in a comment that was meant to throw barbs at me within a thread where reports happen, hence I assumed it was a counter-report, which is 100% entirely unjustified for all of the reasons I mentioned above. I personally believe that the context I provided shouldn't be removed from my comment for
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    But my behavior wasn't bad.

    That doesn't matter. You weren't being reported, so defending your behaviour is just derailing. You can talk about it in a bunch of other places, just not in the rule violations reports thread.

    Removing the context from my response will make my response look completely dismissive

    You can delete or edit the comment yourself, if you think it comes off wrong now.

    hence I assumed it was a counter-report

    It wasn't, it was them attempting to justify their behaviour by explaining how you annoyed them. I responded that I don't think the justification removes the need for a ban, so there's no more action needed.
    Mickey1940
    Mickey1940
    I see. Thanks for the info, and thank you for all of the help you've given me relating to this situation. I really appreciate it!
    Peppersalt43
    I have a question. How many layers is Makima's mind manip?
    Mickey1940
    Mickey1940
    No clue

    afaik no one else in the series uses mind control
    Peppersalt43
    Peppersalt43
    Oh thank goodness. OK, thanks!
    Mickey1940
    Mickey1940
    I'm not an expert at Chainsaw Man by any means btw

    I only got interested in the profiles cuz I just finished reading the manga

    So take everything I say with a grain of salt
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top