-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
TenSura LN Revision — More Details on the Otherworld
- Thread starter Astral_Trinity439
- Start date
- Status
- 62
- 55
In the wiki it's mentioned that it is sometimes referred to as an unchanging four dimensional block? Unless I miss something, it still qualifies for +1DI mean correct me if im wrong but in the text you referenced it suggests that eternalism, by definition, corresponds to a past, future and present and seems to only reference low 2-C stcs. Consdering that. the OP kind of already debunks eternalism for me, since the time in the OW doesnt follow past present future. and the time does not govern 3 dimensional space but rather 4 dimensional space. A bit more on this below
I mean im leaning towards the idea that time here doesnt govern the otherworld. from the evidence it can only be justifiably inferred that time is a hypertimeline. Anything beyond that is just assumptions or unjustified extrapolation which is what i have a problem with.
i agree but it is what it is, my argument already assumes 5D to be the case so eh.
Eternalism (philosophy of time) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
- 22,681
- 23,229
No. All higher dimensional structures operate the same as lower dimensional. There's no difference between 3D+1 and 101D+1 other than the latter being bigger spatially.
If you can prove this, sure. But you have to show it doesn't follow the default.
- 62
- 55
But it is also referred to as an unchanging four dimensional block. So would still be significantly large enough to qualify for +1D as equalivant to an uncountable value
- 1,009
- 1,858
- 24,280
- 37,682
Astral_Trinity439
He/Him- 4,350
- 6,325
- Thread starter
- #168
Btw, do you have any contentions to the current proposals or are you fine with me implementing them after grace is over since we already have 4 votes?
- 22,681
- 23,229
I don't like the base 5D rating but that's unrelated to the thread. It can be applied as long as the 48 hours have passed
- 573
- 547
Fair enough
stated by the OP here:
Anyways in any case the assumptions are genuinely crazy and completely unwarranted. Nothing in the OP proves time governs the 5 dimensional space, atbest its the same dimensionality as the 5 dimensional space.
- Status
Similar threads
