• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Silver Surfer Page Update + 1A Energy Manipulation Rating

FAQ>staff member>your misunderstanding of the FAQ
everything I’ve gone by is what’s said in the faq
In what world does "emulate" mean "just having it normally"
It doesn’t only say emulate in the faq, it also says that you can influence things in a qualitatively superior manner if powered by a 1-A source
There is a difference between can and is, I can run, that doesn’t mean I am
"Shrunk by a qualitative amount" is nonsense. The point of qualitative differences is that they're not necessarily sizelike. It has to be something different, with a different quality, not merely something of a different size.

1-As can grant lower amounts of power, but I don't think they can do so by imparting any amount of their 1-A power source.
If they can increase a non 1-A power to a 1-A amount, which the faq literally says they can, why would they not be able to decrease a 1-A power by a 1-A amount
 
If they can increase a non 1-A power to a 1-A amount, which the faq literally says they can, why would they not be able to decrease a 1-A power by a 1-A amount
Crux of the matter is that 1-A precisely doesn't really work by amounts. Receiving a 1-A amp wouldn't be an expansion of the strength that you already have (lower-dimensionally, at least) so much as you being granted a different sort of power entirely.
 
Crux of the matter is that 1-A precisely doesn't really work by amounts. Receiving a 1-A amp wouldn't be an expansion of the strength that you already have (lower-dimensionally, at least) so much as you being granted a different sort of power entirely.
The faq literally says the exact opposite of this “
However, there are ways to bypass this barrier. For example, a non-1-A can be empowered by a higher entity into being able to influence things on a qualitatively superior level. This can happen either by a straightforward power boost, or by means of some innate metaphysical potential rooted in something from a higher reality (This can include both characters who are converted into natives of higher planes and characters who are physically lower-dimensional but have 1-A statistics). In neither case is the capability to reach into the higher level something emergent from the structure of the lower level, and therefore they are acceptable ways to get around the above hurdles.”
 
The faq literally says the exact opposite of this “
However, there are ways to bypass this barrier. For example, a non-1-A can be empowered by a higher entity into being able to influence things on a qualitatively superior level. This can happen either by a straightforward power boost, or by means of some innate metaphysical potential rooted in something from a higher reality (This can include both characters who are converted into natives of higher planes and characters who are physically lower-dimensional but have 1-A statistics). In neither case is the capability to reach into the higher level something emergent from the structure of the lower level, and therefore they are acceptable ways to get around the above hurdles.”
The bit about "a straightforward power boost" is ambiguous, yeah. Usually by a "power boost" we think of taking a power we already possess and then expanding (boosting) it. Being granted (or awakening, makes no difference) a different kind of power entirely can intelligibly be called a power boost but it's not really an usual one. Can probably be clarified a bit better (and tbh already is, if you read the other parts of the FAQ).
 
The bit about "a straightforward power boost" is ambiguous, yeah. Usually by a "power boost" we think of taking a power we already possess and then expanding (boosting) it. Being granted (or awakening, makes no difference) a different kind of power entirely can intelligibly be called a power boost but it's not really a usual one. Can probably be clarified a bit better (and tbh already is, if you read the other parts of the FAQ).
galactus is granting his heralds a portion of his own power not boosting their power
 
galactus is granting his heralds a portion of his own power not boosting their power
Yeah and that's exactly the problem. Surfer's entire kit is downstream from the Power Cosmic, including the stuff that's decisively not 1-A. A 1-A thing having non-1-A portions is what goes against the entire premise of the tier (And you can't really claim the explanation pages say otherwise because it's plastered everywhere that 1-A can't be divided down into non-1-A).
 
everything I’ve gone by is what’s said in the faq

It doesn’t only say emulate in the faq, it also says that you can influence things in a qualitatively superior manner if powered by a 1-A source
Yes, a 1-A source can decide to act on your behalf to perform 1-A actions. That does not mean that 1-A forces can exist in lower realities (in fact, the FAQ says the exact opposite).
If they can increase a non 1-A power to a 1-A amount, which the faq literally says they can, why would they not be able to decrease a 1-A power by a 1-A amount
It should probably say "grant" rather than "boost", sure.

Don't hyperfocus on that one word, read the entirety of the material we have written about 1-A across multiple pages, and the threads where we decided on that wording, and you will see the actual intention.
 
Yeah and that's exactly the problem. Surfer's entire kit is downstream from the Power Cosmic, including the stuff that's decisively not 1-A. A 1-A thing having non-1-A portions is what goes against the entire premise of the tier (And you can't really claim the explanation pages say otherwise because it's plastered everywhere that 1-A can't be divided down into non-1-A).
Tiering system faq doesn’t say a 1-A being can’t do non 1-A actions, which would be ridiculous if it did since it’s possible for a real person to make stuff in a fictional verse happen and that stuff the real person is making happen is still fictional but caused by a 1-A power, not being able to be split into non 1-A doesn’t mean not able to cause non 1-A effects
 
Yes, a 1-A source can decide to act on your behalf to perform 1-A actions. That does not mean that 1-A forces can exist in lower realities (in fact, the FAQ says the exact opposite).
the faq literally says that a non 1-A being empowered by a 1-A force can effect stuff on a qualitatively superior level
It should probably say "grant" rather than "boost", sure.

Don't hyperfocus on that one word, read the entirety of the material we have written about 1-A across multiple pages, and the threads where we decided on that wording, and you will see the actual intention.
Regardless of that, it doesn’t mean that a 1-A power can’t cause non 1-A effects
 
the faq literally says that a non 1-A being empowered by a 1-A force can effect stuff on a qualitatively superior level
If the entirety of their being is changed into being a 1-A one, then sure, but that makes them unable to reside in smaller space.
Regardless of that, it doesn’t mean that a 1-A power can’t cause non 1-A effects
They can cause non 1-A effects, but they do this by having dominion over all of reality through their superiority over it, not by splitting their superiority into less than 1-A chunks, and then sending those off to do things. That is not possible.
 
Yes, a 1-A source can decide to act on your behalf to perform 1-A actions. That does not mean that 1-A forces can exist in lower realities (in fact, the FAQ says the exact opposite).
Wouldn't say this is limited to 1-A forces puppeteering lower characters, but we can probably discuss that elsewhere (And later because I don't feel like it rn). Not relevant to this thread anyway.

Tiering system faq doesn’t say a 1-A being can’t do non 1-A actions
Yeah, obviously they can do non-1-A actions, but there's a difference between, e.g., a 1-A character making a piece of bread pop up ex nihilo in a lower reality and a 1-A character actually fragmenting a piece of its own power. The latter kind of thing, some process of the 1-A fissioning itself into a non-1-A thing, is what doesn't really happen.
 
If the entirety of their being is changed into being a 1-A one, then sure, but that makes them unable to reside in smaller space.
it doesn’t say they can’t reside in a smaller space, the faq literally gives an example of a being in a lower reality being 1-A
They can cause non 1-A effects, but they do this by having dominion over all of reality through their superiority over it, not by splitting their superiority into less than 1-A chunks, and then sending those off to do things. That is not possible.
My point is that silver surfer can be 1-A and cause non 1-A effects, and he could very easily not realize he’s able to cause 1-A effects or choose to not cause 1-A effects and thus only causes non 1-A effects despite the fact that he can cause 1-A effects
 
it doesn’t say they can’t reside in a smaller space
Yes it does.
the faq literally gives an example of a being in a lower reality being 1-A
Quote it, and I'll tell you how you're misunderstanding it.
My point is that silver surfer can be 1-A and cause non 1-A effects, and he could very easily not realize he’s able to cause 1-A effects or choose to not cause 1-A effects and thus only causes non 1-A effects despite the fact that he can cause 1-A effects
If so, then he cannot reside in smaller realities.
 
In that exact same group of paragraphs it explains there are exceptions
Quote it, and I'll tell you how you're misunderstanding it.
“That said, while they cannot be at this level by having their own physical power increased, they might be endowed with, or awaken, metaphysical attributes that allow them to imitate and influence things on a 1-A and higher scale. For example, consider the following scenario: A cosmology that includes both a physical level and an "informational" level that both transcends the physical and holds the "coding" of all the things in it. An entity capable of influencing the informational level then "locks" a certain person's code, and makes them unable to be interfered with even by other beings on a similar level to itself. This alteration to the metaphysical make-up of the person then emanates downwards into their physical body, and likewise makes them unable to be harmed by anything in the physical world.”
 
In that exact same group of paragraphs it explains there are exceptions
And those exceptions are exactly of the kind we discussed earlier, which do not apply to this thread.
“That said, while they cannot be at this level by having their own physical power increased, they might be endowed with, or awaken, metaphysical attributes that allow them to imitate and influence things on a 1-A and higher scale. For example, consider the following scenario: A cosmology that includes both a physical level and an "informational" level that both transcends the physical and holds the "coding" of all the things in it. An entity capable of influencing the informational level then "locks" a certain person's code, and makes them unable to be interfered with even by other beings on a similar level to itself. This alteration to the metaphysical make-up of the person then emanates downwards into their physical body, and likewise makes them unable to be harmed by anything in the physical world.”
Yeah, this does not involve any 1-A energy entering lower space, or the character being made physically stronger. It's just metaphysical hax.
 
And those exceptions are exactly of the kind we discussed earlier, which do not apply to this thread.
Those exceptions are literally what happens with silver surfer
Yeah, this does not involve any 1-A energy entering lower space, or the character being made physically stronger. It's just metaphysical hax.
in the very next paragraph it says that doing that is making the lower character 1-A
 
Those exceptions are literally what happens with silver surfer
You haven't been arguing for that.
in the very next paragraph it says that doing that is making the lower character 1-A
It's very clear that we index it as "1-A durability", without it actually being that:
In general, a character that is of a lower reality yet has, e.g. "1-A durability," would be receiving a metaphysical alteration that completely overwrites their own physical attributes. In the case of a cosmology that receives such a rating from Reality-Fiction Transcendences, for instance, say in a situation where the lower reality is a drawing to the higher reality, this alteration would not be the character becoming so materially "tough" that the artist cannot erase their drawing anymore. Rather, it would be an alteration at the level of the drawing itself.
 
You haven't been arguing for that.
What are you talking about, my whole argument has been that he’s granted the ability to be 1-A by galactus
It's very clear that we index it as "1-A durability", without it actually being that:
Okay, so he’d still be indexed as having 1-A, if that was found to be consistent, and all of the 1-A stuff that silver surfer interacts with would be just him interacting with the indexed 1-A not actual 1-A version of them
 
What are you talking about, my whole argument has been that he’s granted the ability to be 1-A by galactus
Being granted 1-A isn't an exception!!!!!
Okay, so he’d still be indexed as having 1-A, if that was found to be consistent, and all of the 1-A stuff that silver surfer interacts with would be just him interacting with the indexed 1-A not actual 1-A version of them
You still can't directly & meaningfully interact with that stuff without having 1-A power.
 
@Rgerdeena i think its similar to Nightmare's 1-A amp
Outerverse level (By exploiting Dr. Strange's mystical connection to all living beings, he was amplified by Dream energies , an infinite power of the universe and a force potent enough to conquer the Waking realm and threaten the most powerful universal entities, including Eternity, Death, Lord Chaos and Master Order, and even The Living Tribunal) , possibly far higher (Nightmare has the potential to drain energy from all realities and has claimed to threaten the Multiverse)
 
Being granted 1-A isn't an exception!!!!!
The exceptions are literally that a 1-A entity alters you to be 1-A
You still can't directly & meaningfully interact with that stuff without having 1-A power.
why would “indexed “1-A” but not actually 1-A” not be able to interact with “indexed “1-A” but not actually 1-A”
 
The exceptions are literally that a 1-A entity alters you to be 1-A
That's an exception to a different restriction (that a less than 1-A being cannot gain 1-A power).

That DOES have the exception of being granted such power by a 1-A being.

But the restriction on residing in a lower physical space as a 1-A being (a being that has any 1-A physical stats), does not have such an exception.
why would “indexed “1-A” but not actually 1-A” not be able to interact with “indexed “1-A” but not actually 1-A”
Oh, I thought you were saying some less than 1-A stuff would be able to interact with it. mb
 
That's an exception to a different restriction (that a less than 1-A being cannot gain 1-A power).

That DOES have the exception of being granted such power by a 1-A being.

But the restriction on residing in a lower physical space as a 1-A being (a being that has any 1-A physical stats), does not have such an exception.
The faq literally gives the example of an artist making a drawing within the fictional world, said drawing would obviously be in a smaller space still, silver surfer is the drawing and galactus is the artist, which would qualify for “indexed as “1-A” but not actually 1-A”
 
After reviewing Silver Surfer’s page, I believe the lack of clearly stated or explained feats comes across as somewhat disingenuous. For a character of his status as one of Marvel’s most iconic figures, there should be multiple concrete feats supporting his Low 1-C rating, rather than just lean on being comparable to Thor while still placed below Loki, alongside a rather vague feat involving the activation of a device keyed to Thanos’ power. This does not sufficiently demonstrate the level of physicality expected for that tier.

However, before we go in, let's just remove the "weaker than Loki" key please? Surfer has grown stronger, if not, was always somewhat stronger but bare minimum equal to Loki to begin with anyway. As such, I suggest maintaining his Low 1-C rating, but reinforcing it with more explicit and direct feats.
Low 1-C is getting remove because we (I, specifically) made a thread that originally scaled them to God Realms which was 5-D at the time of the thread but recent research has made it know that God Realms are actually Low 1-A and are currently getting upgrade to that and the heralds getting downgraded to their previous tier which was High 3-A.
Both Thor and Hulk are almost useless when it comes to scaling because of their holding back and varying power level
No 1-A scans
How powerful are the proemial gods?
The celestials vary in their M-body and when they are in universe. So no 1-A.
"6 Soul gems" not "6 infinity gem/stones".
Weakened Knull and knull is weak to light nature.
"The Hunger is upon me". Galactus was hungry. He also vary.
This distinction is important because his energy manipulation and projection have consistently been his primary method of combat and are portrayed as fundamentally separate from his physical strength. For instance, while he can only stalemate physically with characters like Loki in direct combat, the tide often shifts once he begins utilizing his energy output, where he is able to overwhelm opponents more decisively. We also see him capable of making shields that are impenetrable to foes who can easily beat him physically such when he did against the Hulk and even that time he block an energy projection from a Power Stone amped Warrior's madness Thor.
The infinity stones individually vary in nature and they have to be together to be 1-A. Thor also consistently stronger than Silver Surfer.
With that being said, here are multiple feats which should grant Norrin to 1-A decisively:

More justified 1-A rating via Energy Manipulation significance in his battles:
It contradicts it.
Wasn't the Surfer amped?
Already answered this
Another deeper perspective on how disturbingly consistent this perspective is and doubling down on why it's valid.

Notice some of Surfer's feats are always when he was extremely weakened?

First we have the manipulation of the Big Crunch where Norrin performed him after a brutal amount punishment against the Proemial Gods,
This scan is not enough.
Low 1-A
Stranger is a fraud and should be downgraded to Low 1-A
Already answered this
A very vague statement.
Already answered this.
Outlier and Galactus vary.

Ronan Is 3-C
Wonder Man is 5-B
Peak Strange is 1- A and we don't always know when he is operating at that level.
Seriously, this is an Outlier. With this it would be Surfer > Galactus > The Griever instead of Griever > Galactus > Surfer


Most we can get is Low 1-A since every other 1-A feat is either an outlier or just amp.
 
The faq literally gives the example of an artist making a drawing within the fictional world, said drawing would obviously be in a smaller space still, silver surfer is the drawing and galactus is the artist, which would qualify for “indexed as “1-A” but not actually 1-A”
This is not what you were arguing for earlier
Emulating a 1-A force can mean that their emulating it with their physicals
if your talking about silver surfer’s atoms, then those are powered by a 1-A force so they are able to be 1-A
Power cosmic within planets or whatever, I’m not the most knowledgeable on galactus’s lore
Not how that works, you can’t use quantity to split 1-A into non 1-A, a qualitive decrease can make 1-A non 1-A, and as galactus is a 1-A entity he can presumably split his power into qualitatively inferior amounts
galactus is granting his heralds a portion of his own power not boosting their power
You haven't posted any scans to go along with this significant change in interpretation. And you weren't really forthcoming with the fact that your interpretation has moved from "It's fine for Silver Surfer's atoms to be 1-A" to "Of course Silver Surfer's not actually 1-A physically, Galactus is just imitating those effects on his behalf."

Ultimately I'm not equipped to judge what the scans say, I'm just here for Standards. Now that you're saying that your interpretation is something that coheres with the standards, rather than fighting against the standards themselves, my job's done here.
 
I think this is just one of like a billion cases of Marvel's power system not perfectly lining up with our tiering system. This isn't a problem for Doctor Strange, so why is it a problem for Silver Surfer. In Marvel, characters can perform 1-A feats and still be 3D beings. That is only a contradiction because we decided it was. If a character can consistently perform feats against a 1-A character but doesn't have BDE, then frankly I think that should be reconciled by following the in-universe logic rather than imposing our own rules on a verse that doesn't have them. I don't want to sound like I'm attacking the tiering system or the people who care about it or anything, but I just think we should follow a verse's logic most of the time in cases of contradiction like this

1-A is getting downgraded to Low 1-A anyway (although maybe getting upgraded back to 1-A after that...). So, the question here really should just be "is it consistent for Silver Surfer to scale to Skyfather level with his energy."
 
Last edited:
I think this is just one of like a billion cases of Marvel's power system not perfectly lining up with our tiering system. This isn't a problem for Doctor Strange, so why is it a problem for Silver Surfer. In Marvel, characters can perform 1-A feats and still be 3D beings. That is only a contradiction because we decided it was. If a character can consistently perform feats against a 1-A character but doesn't have BDE, then frankly I think that should be reconciled by following the in-universe logic rather than imposing our own rules on a verse that doesn't have them. I don't want to sound like I'm attacking the tiering system or the people who care about it or anything, but I just think we should follow a verse' logic most of the time in cases of contradiction like this
Nah bro you're spitting truth
 
I think this is just one of like a billion cases of Marvel's power system not perfectly lining up with our tiering system. This isn't a problem for Doctor Strange, so why is it a problem for Silver Surfer. In Marvel, characters can perform 1-A feats and still be 3D beings. That is only a contradiction because we decided it was. If a character can consistently perform feats against a 1-A character but doesn't have BDE, then frankly I think that should be reconciled by following the in-universe logic rather than imposing our own rules on a verse that doesn't have them. I don't want to sound like I'm attacking the tiering system or the people who care about it or anything, but I just think we should follow a verse' logic most of the time in cases of contradiction like this

1-A is getting downgraded to Low 1-A anyway (although maybe getting upgraded back to 1-A after that...). So, the question here really should just be "is it consistent for Silver Surfer to scale to Skyfather level with his energy."
Shameless special pleading
 
Shameless special pleading
What? I'm not leaning either way on this debate. I've not read much Silver Surfer so I have no opinion on whether he scales to this or not. But it is objectively true that Marvel's verse works differently than our tiering system does. It is ridiculous to make up rules about cosmology and then impose them on a verse that has existed for decades. If there are contradictions, then our job is to find a semblance of consistent in-universe logic and use our tiering system to catalogue that. It is not the job of writers to make their cosmology and power systems fall in line with our site's strict definition of a word we made up. The system is great for organizing and labeling events in stories, but we can't act as if those stories have a responsibility to follow our rules.

If there is a realm that is consistently 1-A, and Character A can affect/destroy that realm, and Character B is shown to be comparable to them, then they are 1-A under that universe's logic, its as simple as that. We can't just go "ummm actually, writer, you made a mistake with Character B beating Character A because they don't actually have BDE Type 3." There is no inherent contradiction in Silver Surfer fighting beings of this level, we literally invented this contradiction.
 
What? I'm not leaning either way on this debate. I've not read much Silver Surfer so I have no opinion on whether he scales to this or not. But it is objectively true that Marvel's verse works differently than our tiering system does. It is ridiculous to make up rules about cosmology and then impose them on a verse that has existed for decades. If there are contradictions, then our job is to find a semblance of consistent in-universe logic and use our tiering system to catalogue that. It is not the job of writers to make their cosmology and power systems fall in line with our site's strict definition of a word we made up. The system is great for organizing and labeling events in stories, but we can't act as if those stories have a responsibility to follow our rules.

If there is a realm that is consistently 1-A, and Character A can affect/destroy that realm, and Character B is shown to be comparable to them, then they are 1-A under that universe's logic, its as simple as that. We can't just go "ummm actually, writer, you made a mistake with Character B beating Character A because they don't actually have BDE Type 3." There is no inherent contradiction in Silver Surfer fighting beings of this level, we literally invented this contradiction.
Holy powerscaler brainrot. Imagine saying that Marvel is the only verse that somehow doesn’t follow VSBW logic; do you think other verses don’t have issues with the TS either? How does that matter to them? We simply scale characters if they fit the standards, if they don’t then they don’t. There’s no contradiction to characters fighting certain other characters but it just so means that this interaction might delimit them to a tier. And so be it.

After all, it’s not on the author to somehow care about powerscaling, because they shouldn’t and are not supposed to.
 
Holy powerscaler brainrot
Powerscaler brainrot is literally the thing I am arguing against. I am saying that the story should take precedence over our rules for powerscaling terms.
Imagine saying that Marvel is the only verse that somehow doesn’t follow VSBW logic; do you think other verses don’t have issues with the TS either
Obviously not what I'm saying, and the fact that other verses have issues proves my point. That is exactly why we need to prioritize each verse's own rules over the TS rules.
 
I think this is just one of like a billion cases of Marvel's power system not perfectly lining up with our tiering system. This isn't a problem for Doctor Strange, so why is it a problem for Silver Surfer. In Marvel, characters can perform 1-A feats and still be 3D beings. That is only a contradiction because we decided it was. If a character can consistently perform feats against a 1-A character but doesn't have BDE, then frankly I think that should be reconciled by following the in-universe logic rather than imposing our own rules on a verse that doesn't have them. I don't want to sound like I'm attacking the tiering system or the people who care about it or anything, but I just think we should follow a verse's logic most of the time in cases of contradiction like this

1-A is getting downgraded to Low 1-A anyway (although maybe getting upgraded back to 1-A after that...). So, the question here really should just be "is it consistent for Silver Surfer to scale to Skyfather level with his energy."
As much as I agree that marvel’s system doesn’t perfectly line up with our tiering system, no verse’s system perfectly matches our tiering system, the best we can do is just try our best to make it fit and if that makes them stronger or weaker then they should be so be it
 
I think this is just one of like a billion cases of Marvel's power system not perfectly lining up with our tiering system. This isn't a problem for Doctor Strange, so why is it a problem for Silver Surfer. In Marvel, characters can perform 1-A feats and still be 3D beings. That is only a contradiction because we decided it was. If a character can consistently perform feats against a 1-A character but doesn't have BDE, then frankly I think that should be reconciled by following the in-universe logic rather than imposing our own rules on a verse that doesn't have them. I don't want to sound like I'm attacking the tiering system or the people who care about it or anything, but I just think we should follow a verse's logic most of the time in cases of contradiction like this

1-A is getting downgraded to Low 1-A anyway (although maybe getting upgraded back to 1-A after that...). So, the question here really should just be "is it consistent for Silver Surfer to scale to Skyfather level with his energy."
1-A and up used to not be such large of a jump. Our tiering system used to effectively cap at what is currently High 1-B+ (technically it was also open to anything higher, but that's where the minimum of the highest tier was).

Some people argued that we should have the ludicrously high ratings of 1-A and above, and to justify such an extreme increase in ratings, they'd interpret certain things as being far stronger than we did previously, but only grant them if the verse lacked contradictions against such characters actually being completely unassailably higher.

So yeah, it's only a contradiction because we say it is, but it's also only that high because we say it is. If we weren't that generous in how we interpreted certain extremely vague statements, it would be rated far lower regardless.
 
I think this is just one of like a billion cases of Marvel's power system not perfectly lining up with our tiering system. This isn't a problem for Doctor Strange, so why is it a problem for Silver Surfer. In Marvel, characters can perform 1-A feats and still be 3D beings. That is only a contradiction because we decided it was. If a character can consistently perform feats against a 1-A character but doesn't have BDE, then frankly I think that should be reconciled by following the in-universe logic rather than imposing our own rules on a verse that doesn't have them. I don't want to sound like I'm attacking the tiering system or the people who care about it or anything, but I just think we should follow a verse's logic most of the time in cases of contradiction like this

1-A is getting downgraded to Low 1-A anyway (although maybe getting upgraded back to 1-A after that...). So, the question here really should just be "is it consistent for Silver Surfer to scale to Skyfather level with his energy."
I sympathize with that sentiment, yeah. I myself think that people will sometimes radicalize 1-A's "inaccessibility" to high heavens, since, really, the inaccessibility in question is just supposed to be downstream from the definition of the tier: 1-A superiority is such that it can't be added up to by non-1-A + non-1-A, nor divided down into them, therefore, etc. Other formulations like "1-A and non-1-A are in different qualitative levels and the latter can't affect the former" and so on are just restating the same concept as the former description. There's not much else to it and I'd rather not mystify it. That's what it is. And this same simplicity is why I tend to be charitable towards potential anti-feats: If there's a way to reconcile it, I'm amenable to it as long as there are proper explanations, roughly same as how, if a character is incorporeal and another character punches it out, our takeaway will be that the latter dude has Non-Physical Interaction, rather than that the incorporeality in question simply doesn't grant immunity to physical attacks, or that the punch is an anti-feat for the incorporeality (The disanalogy being that, for 1-A, we require a mechanism, e.g. "power comes from the 1-A realm and such and such", and not just a showing, whereas we don't demand a mechanism for having NPI).

Sometimes, though, things will just run afoul of that definition regardless. Some cases are obvious, like "ohhh this thing is expanding and after a while it got so big that it broke through into the supposed 1-Aspace!", and others are less so, and it's not really possible to precisely lay out when one (the obvious) ends and the other (the not-so-obvious) begins. Typical sorites paradox. The latter cases are what give us headaches (Such as right now), and that'll keep happening, I'm afraid, since it's not possible to systematize things enough to cover every imaginable contingency. (Also why I think people should see things more holistically instead of fixating on a strict numbering of "feats vs anti-feats." Sometimes the anti-feats will be an occasion to think that the feats were never actually feats to begin with, or somesuch, or the feats will give you a context within which to judge the anti-feats, and so on)
 
Last edited:
Shameless special pleading
Please,
Marvel and DC for sure have this the worst but I digress.

If the point of the wiki is power accuracy why would we not adhere to the logic of the verse? If 3-D has consistently affected something that meets all requirements of 1-A minus interaction then why not add a “P&A” for it?
 
Please,
Marvel and DC for sure have this the worst but I digress.

If the point of the wiki is power accuracy why would we not adhere to the logic of the verse? If 3-D has consistently affected something that meets all requirements of 1-A minus interaction then why not add a “P&A” for it?
Then it js doesn’t meet the requirements?? Literally any other verse would get downgraded for this.
 
Back
Top