- 5,475
- 6,585
Bro would rather say this than admit 1-A atoms is bsFAQ>staff member
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bro would rather say this than admit 1-A atoms is bsFAQ>staff member
It's literally the staff member that convinced Ultima (the guy who made the 1-A rules in the first place) to make that thread adding the FAQ lol. You can't just use death of the author here over literal rules.FAQ>staff member
No one said atoms are 1-ABro would rather say this than admit 1-A atoms is bs
I don’t care who made the rules, the rules are the rules, not what a staff member saidIt's literally the staff member that convinced Ultima (the guy who made the 1-A rules in the first place) to make that thread adding the FAQ lol. You can't just use death of the author here over literal rules.
What do you think is the object that makes up someones physical body.No one said atoms are 1-A
Kindly quote me the specific quote where the FAQ says that a 1-A can punch with literal 1-A kinetic force and the debate will be done.I don’t care who made the rules, the rules are the rules, not what a staff member said
if your talking about silver surfer’s atoms, then those are powered by a 1-A force so they are able to be 1-AWhat do you think is the object that makes up someone’s physical body.
“A similar case, therefore, goes for Attack Potency. A character from a lower reality cannot "punch with 1-A force," because even if the higher reality has a concept of force, it is completely disconnected from that of the lower reality and therefore there is nothing that can bridge the two. They can, however, serve as a sort of conduit for power from a higher level, and thereby imitate qualitatively greater Attack Potency.” literally says a 1-A reality can have their own concept of forceKindly quote me the specific quote where the FAQ says that a 1-A can punch with literal 1-A kinetic force and the debate will be done.
It literally says they literally can't punch with real 1-A force but can only emulate its effects through hax, lol.“A similar case, therefore, goes for Attack Potency. A character from a lower reality cannot "punch with 1-A force," because even if the higher reality has a concept of force, it is completely disconnected from that of the lower reality and therefore there is nothing that can bridge the two. They can, however, serve as a sort of conduit for power from a higher level, and thereby imitate qualitatively greater Attack Potency.” literally says a 1-A reality can have their own concept of force
It doesn’t mention Hax when it says emulateIt literally says they literally can't punch with real 1-A force but can only emulate its effects through hax, lol.
It doesn’t mention Hax when it says emulate
You did not even read what you're copy-pasting lol.“A similar case, therefore, goes for Attack Potency. A character from a lower reality cannot "punch with 1-A force," because even if the higher reality has a concept of force, it is completely disconnected from that of the lower reality and therefore there is nothing that can bridge the two. They can, however, serve as a sort of conduit for power from a higher level, and thereby imitate qualitatively greater Attack Potency.” literally says a 1-A reality can have their own concept of force
yes, silver surfer can imitate 1-A attack potency because he is powered by the 1-A power cosmic, any more questionsYou did not even read what you're copy-pasting lol.
Bro would rather say this than admit 1-A atoms is bs
Power cosmic within planets or whatever, I’m not the most knowledgeable on galactus’s loreAre these 1-A atoms the reason why Galactus goes from Low 1-C to 1-A after eating 4 planets
Imitating doesn't mean being the real deal, though. Did you skip a lesson about definitions or something?yes, silver surfer can imitate 1-A attack potency because he is powered by the 1-A power cosmic, any more questions
It isn’t the real deal but for practical combat purposes it isImitating doesn't mean being the real deal, though. Did you skip a lesson about definitions or something?
So you just admitted he's not really 1-A in physicals, cool.It isn’t the real deal but for practical combat purposes it is
What would you call something that isn’t technically 1-A but for all practical intents and purposes functions the same as 1-ASo you just admitted he's not really 1-A in physicals, cool.
As already said from Agnaa, it'd be something like:What would you call something that isn’t technically 1-A but for all practical intents and purposes functions the same as 1-A
this doesn’t answer my question, at allAs already said from Agnaa, it'd be something like:
They're not physically that strong, but they're emulating these effects through loopholes.
- A 1-A character viewing a lower reality as a simulation, and them giving to one of the lower entities a code that makes them immune to all harm
- A 1-A character giving to a lower entity a "blessing" that allows them to annihilate anything within said lower reality
I literally did, you asked what's not 1-A yet can emulate its effects and I did so.this doesn’t answer my question, at all
No you didn’t, you restated emulating 1-A in a longer explanation, not gave what to call itI literally did, you asked what's not 1-A yet can emulate its effects and I did so.
We are literally downgrading captain America’s shield along with half of the 1-As in an ongoing threadIf you don't wanna get it, not my problem, have fun having your 1-A Captain America shield or whatever nonsense y'all Marvel goons have.
All heralds of Galactus have to be 1-A at peak if Galactus is 1-A because of how the tiering system works. Any quantity of the Power Cosmic would have to be on the same qualitative level as the Power Cosmic itself. Even if Galactus gives infinitesimal amounts to each herald.Knull is gonna be Low 1-A after my revision, same with Mephisto, so Surfer will be Low 1-A at peak even if all this was accepted which I'm not sure it should be
Right but this has to be in limited circumstances since any case of anything not 1-A affecting a given person/object with ‘1-A durability’ (or them being unable to affect someone without the same level of ‘qualitatively emanated plot-armor’) is an anti-feat which would nuke their rating. So you would have to say 1-A durability is only a limited thing activated in certain circumstances where the character is just completely invulnerable to anything not sourced from another 1-A character. But something like Captain America’s shield clearly doesn’t operate this way (since the claim is that it’s passive in 1-A durability as currently indexed, with no higher emanated mechanism, despite clearly being affected by non-1-A things [e.g., the smelting process with proto-adamantium producing it to begin with]).“A similar case, therefore, goes for Attack Potency. A character from a lower reality cannot "punch with 1-A force," because even if the higher reality has a concept of force, it is completely disconnected from that of the lower reality and therefore there is nothing that can bridge the two. They can, however, serve as a sort of conduit for power from a higher level, and thereby imitate qualitatively greater Attack Potency.” literally says a 1-A reality can have their own concept of force
What's the thread?No you didn’t, you restated emulating 1-A in a longer explanation, not gave what to call it
We are literally downgrading captain America’s shield along with half of the 1-As in an ongoing thread
Not how that works, you can’t use quantity to split 1-A into non 1-A, a qualitive decrease can make 1-A non 1-A, and as galactus is a 1-A entity he can presumably split his power into qualitatively inferior amountsAll heralds of Galactus have to be 1-A at peak if Galactus is 1-A because of how the tiering system works. Any quantity of the Power Cosmic would have to be on the same qualitative level as the Power Cosmic itself. Even if Galactus gives infinitesimal amounts to each herald.
That’s the case in real life, in fiction making a fictional object a real object is an actual Hax, it’s literally in one of our P&A pages, so presumably making a fictional character have the power of a real being is also possible in fictionRight but this has to be in limited circumstances since any case of anything not 1-A affecting a given person/object with ‘1-A durability’ (or them being unable to affect someone without the same level of ‘qualitatively emanated plot-armor’) is an anti-feat which would nuke their rating. So you would have to say 1-A durability is only a limited thing activated in certain circumstances where the character is just completely invulnerable to anything not sourced from another 1-A character. But something like Captain America’s shield clearly doesn’t operate this way (since the claim is that it’s passive in 1-A durability as currently indexed, with no higher emanated mechanism, despite clearly being affected by non-1-A things [e.g., the smelting process with proto-adamantium producing it to begin with]).
This is… exactly not how 1-A works lmfaoNot how that works, you can’t use quantity to split 1-A into non 1-A, a qualitive decrease can make 1-A non 1-A, and as galactus is a 1-A entity he can presumably split his power into qualitatively inferior amounts
HereWhat's the thread?
“However, there are ways to bypass this barrier. For example, a non-1-A can be empowered by a higher entity into being able to influence things on a qualitatively superior level. This can happen either by a straightforward power boost, or by means of some innate metaphysical potential rooted in something from a higher reality (This can include both characters who are converted into natives of higher planes and characters who are physically lower-dimensional but have 1-A statistics). In neither case is the capability to reach into the higher level something emergent from the structure of the lower level, and therefore they are acceptable ways to get around the above hurdles.” it is exactly how 1-A worksThis is… exactly not how 1-A works lmfao
You said:“However, there are ways to bypass this barrier. For example, a non-1-A can be empowered by a higher entity into being able to influence things on a qualitatively superior level. This can happen either by a straightforward power boost, or by means of some innate metaphysical potential rooted in something from a higher reality (This can include both characters who are converted into natives of higher planes and characters who are physically lower-dimensional but have 1-A statistics). In neither case is the capability to reach into the higher level something emergent from the structure of the lower level, and therefore they are acceptable ways to get around the above hurdles.” it is exactly how 1-A works
If some whole can be divided into multiple constituents, then the whole is naturally the composition of the constituents.as galactus is a 1-A entity he can presumably split his power into qualitatively inferior amounts
It’s not that it’s impossible to make many ‘emanations’ of the same energy, it’s just that in this case (the idea that Galactus gives the 1-A emanation to Norrin, but only some Low 1-A separate version to Firelord) is not only totally headcanon, but it also contradicts the idea of Galactus just being a giant pool of cosmic energy which his heralds tap into based on his allowance, which is basically the colloquial explanation for how heralds work in canon.Not how that works, you can’t use quantity to split 1-A into non 1-A, a qualitive decrease can make 1-A non 1-A, and as galactus is a 1-A entity he can presumably split his power into qualitatively inferior amounts
This is incoherent. 1-A standards don’t exist in real life; a fictional character can have the ‘proxy’ association with a qualitatively superior force which might look like AP or durability in the same way ‘plot-armored invulnerability’ is a thing, but the standards here are that this has to be explicit and limited in its scope. Like, you can say that a character might be empowered by a 1-A force only in this limited instance such that they could literally destroy anything in front of them with no effort (as a 1-A force ‘updates’ the lower reality from having that object to not having it), but if that’s the explanation, and they explicitly can’t just arbitrarily affect a character with no 1-A mechanism for plot-invulnerability, it’s an anti-feat and nukes the rating. Same with durability.That’s the case in real life, in fiction making a fictional object a real object is an actual Hax, it’s literally in one of our P&A pages, so presumably making a fictional character have the power of a real being is also possible in fiction
oops, thought you were replying to a different comment, my bad internet is really messing me upYou said:
If some whole can be divided into multiple constituents, then the whole is naturally the composition of the constituents.
1-A is defined by the fact it is not a composition of qualitatively inferior things. As such, it cannot be split up into varying inferior parts, since it does not possess those parts to begin with.
Imgur's not working here. (Also wouldn't really make sense even in-verse)
Or here.First we have the manipulation of the Big Crunch
It’s not headcannon, you would have to prove their being increased by a qualitative amount not the other way around, and galactus is not at all just a giant pool of cosmic energy that his heralds tap into, he is an actual entity that gives his heralds however much power he wants toIt’s not that it’s impossible to make many ‘emanations’ of the same energy, it’s just that in this case (the idea that Galactus gives the 1-A emanation to Norrin, but only some Low 1-A separate version to Firelord) is not only totally headcanon, but it also contradicts the idea of Galactus just being a giant pool of cosmic energy which his heralds tap into based on his allowance, which is basically the colloquial explanation for how heralds work in canon.
All of this is just an argument against him being 1-A not that he can be 1-A, I never said silver surfer is 1-A, I said he can be 1-AThis is incoherent. 1-A standards don’t exist in real life; a fictional character can have the ‘proxy’ association with a qualitatively superior force which might look like AP or durability in the same way ‘plot-armored invulnerability’ is a thing, but the standards here are that this has to be explicit and limited in its scope. Like, you can say that a character might be empowered by a 1-A force only in this limited instance such that they could literally destroy anything in front of them with no effort (as a 1-A force ‘updates’ the lower reality from having that object to not having it), but if that’s the explanation, and they explicitly can’t do that to some character with no 1-A mechanism, it’s an anti-feat and nukes the rating. Same with durability.
He doesn’t get his power from a non 1-A object or adding non 1-A objects, he gets his power from a 1-A sourceTo address the elephant in the room, though: Yeah, the opposition is correct that having 1-A stats as an extension of your lower-dimensional strength isn't really a thing. It basically follows tautologically from what the tier is: You can't add non-1-A with non-1-A to yield 1-A, therefore, etc. Whatever 1-A stats you have would need to be had through some other unorthodox mechanism. So most of these effects, even if legitimate, are prima facie just anti-feats against a 1-A rating.
FAQ>staff member>your misunderstanding of the FAQFAQ>staff member
In what world does "emulate" mean "just having it normally"?It doesn’t mention Hax when it says emulate
I never said silver surfer is 1-A, I said he can be 1-A
"Shrunk by a qualitative amount" is nonsense. The point of qualitative differences is that they're not sizelike. It has to be something different, with a different quality, not merely something of a different size.Anyways, it isn’t quantifiably made up of smaller parts, it can still be shrunk by a qualitive amount in the same way that a 1-A entity can make a non 1-A character qualitatively more powerful