This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Personally I would prefer something like: "Resistance to Existence Erasure (can withstand techniques similar to Darkseid's Omega Beams)", but yes, you have to correct idea.
Just want to say, as the Existence erasure page specifies "Note that one shouldn't list a character to have resistance/immunity against this ability in total".
So if you list something in this regards please be specific. Either mention it as resistance against the mechanism/ability that...
I don't think something like that was ever calculated.
There is also a simple reason: Many, IIRC the majority even, of meteors is pretty small.
Like below 10 cm small or something.
And most meteors don't even reach the earth surface.
So an average meteor energy or anything of the kind...
I think the Dimension and Higher-Dimensional Manipulation page do its job of explaining the concepts appropriately for the casual reader.
The Tiering system page specifies that we rank according to size in regards to higher dimensions, so that is fine as well.
Personally I think the pages are...
@Matthew: They have nothing to do with units like kg or Joule, which are also sometimes referred to as dimensions.
Aside from that physics usually makes the same use of the term as math/geometry. They just don't consider those in regards to stuff like size, but about other things (like how fast...
I just want to say that the geometrical definition is a scientific definition, that is the mathematical definition. 'cause, you know... math is a science and geometry is a mathematical subject of study.
@LordXcano:"And, again, we don't do over 10 meters we do 1 meter. Redoing this would mean they can react to an attack moving at Mach 162.54, not 0.1c."
I haven't checked anything else, but that statement cought my attention, so I looked at that one just in that regards.
Actually we don't do 1...
I believe one reason for intelligence to only have suggestions was the fact that there is no completly objective way to compare characters to each other in this regards. Even in real life it is debateable how to measure intelligence and fiction makes it way more difficult. The suggestions for...
@Antvasima: I don't think so. Knowing how to use the calculator of ones choice is the obligation of the user.
@Unite My Rice: I have an activity of approx. 1.5 responses per day or something. So I really don't invest much time on here this days. So I definitely don't feel like teaching people...
Don't know for Cell, but in general I wouldn't even agree that absorbing 100k people can be equated to gaining 100k times the power of a human.
Absorbing stuff can generally vary from no power increase up to more than the sum of the powers.
I mean assume a human absorbs 100k other humans. Sure...
The only way I know is uploading it on youtube (or similar) and embed it using the video embed tool.
I don't think wikia lets you upload videos to itself directly.
Well, first your formulation 2atan(Object_Size/Panel_Height/tan(70/2))) misses a parenthesis.
It has to be 2atan(Object_Size/(Panel_Height/tan(70/2)))
That is simply a writing error (there was one closing bracket too much already)
So why is
Object_Size/(Panel_Height/tan(70/2)) =...
Object_Size/(Panel_Height/tan(70/2)) = (Object_Size/Panel_Height)*tan(70/2)
Brackets are important, but aside from that it's the same.
Edit: For the result from the calc, I get 45┬░, which I would assume lies in the realm of rounding error. No idea how you got your values.
Literally me from the last thread:
"The power holds that current together, but who said one would require that much work to do so? The flooding of the planet is an indirect result of the change of the current. As far as I remember the movie one can basically interpret it in terms of climate...