This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Personally I would prefer something like: "Resistance to Existence Erasure (can withstand techniques similar to Darkseid's Omega Beams)", but yes, you have to correct idea.
Just want to say, as the Existence erasure page specifies "Note that one shouldn't list a character to have resistance/immunity against this ability in total".
So if you list something in this regards please be specific. Either mention it as resistance against the mechanism/ability that...
I don't think something like that was ever calculated.
There is also a simple reason: Many, IIRC the majority even, of meteors is pretty small.
Like below 10 cm small or something.
And most meteors don't even reach the earth surface.
So an average meteor energy or anything of the kind...
I think the Dimension and Higher-Dimensional Manipulation page do its job of explaining the concepts appropriately for the casual reader.
The Tiering system page specifies that we rank according to size in regards to higher dimensions, so that is fine as well.
Personally I think the pages are...
@Matthew: They have nothing to do with units like kg or Joule, which are also sometimes referred to as dimensions.
Aside from that physics usually makes the same use of the term as math/geometry. They just don't consider those in regards to stuff like size, but about other things (like how fast...
I just want to say that the geometrical definition is a scientific definition, that is the mathematical definition. 'cause, you know... math is a science and geometry is a mathematical subject of study.
@LordXcano:"And, again, we don't do over 10 meters we do 1 meter. Redoing this would mean they can react to an attack moving at Mach 162.54, not 0.1c."
I haven't checked anything else, but that statement cought my attention, so I looked at that one just in that regards.
Actually we don't do 1...
I believe one reason for intelligence to only have suggestions was the fact that there is no completly objective way to compare characters to each other in this regards. Even in real life it is debateable how to measure intelligence and fiction makes it way more difficult. The suggestions for...
@Antvasima: I don't think so. Knowing how to use the calculator of ones choice is the obligation of the user.
@Unite My Rice: I have an activity of approx. 1.5 responses per day or something. So I really don't invest much time on here this days. So I definitely don't feel like teaching people...
Don't know for Cell, but in general I wouldn't even agree that absorbing 100k people can be equated to gaining 100k times the power of a human.
Absorbing stuff can generally vary from no power increase up to more than the sum of the powers.
I mean assume a human absorbs 100k other humans. Sure...
The only way I know is uploading it on youtube (or similar) and embed it using the video embed tool.
I don't think wikia lets you upload videos to itself directly.
Well, first your formulation 2atan(Object_Size/Panel_Height/tan(70/2))) misses a parenthesis.
It has to be 2atan(Object_Size/(Panel_Height/tan(70/2)))
That is simply a writing error (there was one closing bracket too much already)
So why is
Object_Size/(Panel_Height/tan(70/2)) =...
Object_Size/(Panel_Height/tan(70/2)) = (Object_Size/Panel_Height)*tan(70/2)
Brackets are important, but aside from that it's the same.
Edit: For the result from the calc, I get 45┬░, which I would assume lies in the realm of rounding error. No idea how you got your values.
Literally me from the last thread:
"The power holds that current together, but who said one would require that much work to do so? The flooding of the planet is an indirect result of the change of the current. As far as I remember the movie one can basically interpret it in terms of climate...
I am confused.
I thought surviving causality being rewritten and causality paradoxes like in the digimon example and I think also for madoka and description wise I guess also saint seiya, would now be classified as resistance to causality manipulation (and time paradox immunity) and not...
With Ryukos small building level durability and the regen she technically even has in this version, I believe, this ends with skulduggery flying above her head until he eventually gets tired so that she wins.
That is of course unless with 9-B version you mean Viles 9-B version, in which case he...
Oh hey, another debate about semantics.
In this case I don't mind, though. I wanted to get clarification on the destinction made between resisting time paradoxes, resisting causality and the whole no version in time being affected by what happens to the other versions for a long time, just...
@Monarch Laciel: Fate Manipulation comes in two types though, possibility manipulation and causality manipulation.
Since this is the former listing just fate manipulation is less specific than necessary.
And making it so that there is a 100% chance of the person dying (if possible) is the same...
Essentially we are having different definitions of omnipresence.
What you suggest is beyond what the wikis definition is, which is just "Omnipresence is the property of being present everywhere, whenever and nowhere at the same time, referring to an unbounded presence. The ability lets you to...
@Matthew: Being able to percieve everywhere at once does not imply fast reactions. Imagine for example a 2-D universe, with the size of just a 1 m^2 square. You could percieve everywhere in that universe at once by looking down at it, but are not necessarily capable to react to whats going on in...
Well, as far as we only speak about omnipresence as being everywhere at once (which is sufficient to qualify for our wiki as far as I am aware) an omnipresent being can have slow reaction time. There is nothing that speaks against that being possible. So in that regards I have to agree with...
@Venom: The formula can not be used like that as I explained above.
To say it in a short way again:
1. Per strict definition of speed nothing has more than one speed. (speed is a well defined function onto the real numbers)
2. s is change in distance and t is change in time (hence it is...
Well, my argument was exactly not to involve any physics or math formulas here, as they don't apply.
(I also didn't claim that there aren't different levels of immeasurable?)
To make a concrete formulation to be copied on the Omnipresence page, is the following ok?
"While Omnipresence is...
@Matthew: Thing is there is no worse explanation for something, than one that is wrong per definition.
Omnipresence isn't a speed after the definition of speed in physics, just as immeasurable or Irrelevant (or technically even infinite, I believe) are neither.
That is no reason for it not to...
Regarding this edit, I think we should scratch the formulas out of there.
One of our physics students can certainly give the official definition of speed, but for the 1D case I would already think that it is strictly Ôêås/Ôêåt or in general, as I learned it from a mathematical standpoint, if $...
Well, in regards to the deletion thing I can just say again: Never delete a page without warning.
At minimum add delete to them and wait 24h before doing so.
Takes just 5 seconds more work and is a lot more fair in regards to the people that take care of the page.
If I have a sun in a video game that doesn't mean the video game simulates hundreds of millions of kilometers of game world. Games are created to look realistic not work realistic.
That aside in regards to Virtual Reality stuff you have to consider what is the "basis world".
To explain...
@Aizen: Well some other profiles have something like "higher reactions with precognition" listed as well, so in my opinion there should be some mentioning that he can deal with certain much faster attacks using it.
That aside, if this would not get further input (looks like it, not further...
Without demonstrating the assumption that below tier 2 hax works on above tier 2 dura is stretching it (I mean those characters can survive having their timeline destroyed, that makes everything happening in the timeline seem pretty irrelevant). Usually one shouldn't assume so without...
Well, maybe I will just catch up with the manga (or the novel, though the last time I read Intrigues I literally fell asleep; in my opinion a novel is too slow paced for the series). In that case we have the answer once I reach that part.
Well, first and formost in order to upgrade her you would need proof that your interpretation is the only correct one, not the other way around. The one demanding upgrades has the burden of proof.
That aside his goal, from what is explained on the wiki, and also from what is said in the scan...
Context in needed on this a lot, as well as some explanation in regards to terminology.
For example the time travel devices in Haruhi are called TPDD, which is an abbreviation for Time Plane Destruction Device and supposedly by every use make a hole in the time plane.
What time plane means is...
OK, so to come to an agreement:
I think, while generally there are opinons that existance erasure can stay as part of void manipulation, nobody is strictly against it getting a seperate page.
In that case how about the Existence Erasure page getting a definition matching the existence erasure...
Abilities can describe both an effect or a mechanism and generally both can be listed on profiles.
If you are using Plot Manipulation to create fire, you have Plot Manipulation (as mechanism) and Fire Manipulation as an ability you get through it.
Magic is an example for an ability only given...
@Conflicting Messiah: That doesn't mean it isn't a subpower, though. I mean you can also use causality manipulation to create fire, non the less fire creation is a subpower of fire manipulation and doesn't deserve a seperate page.
Causality, concept and plot manipulation can, just like reality...
@Kaltias: If she makes the matter disappear and doesn't just break it into smaller parts or turn it into energy, it would qualify according the the definition of the void manipulation page.
According to the current definition of the existence erasure page I am not sure. I mean if used on a...