• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
New Gaiden chapter confirms that the gap between viscount and count is bigger than the gap between peerage holder and ordinary demon, in fact Korne took 700 years to reach viscount, but another 1600 years to reach count.

So yea, 10-B (ordinary demon) to 7-B (baron) is a smaller gap than at least 7-B (viscount) to count.
Btw what do you think of Names stabilising one's existence ? Seems meaningless right now but we could argue its CM Type 3

But since its from alice it should be Valid
 
Interesting, but not useful.

Unless somebody destroys a person's name, even then by this point authorities are the main thing so yea dont think it will become relevant
 
That is what I initially thought but it can lead to some interesting conclusion.

Similar to how Isis being an incarnation of Death lead to AE Type 2 eventually down the line so its fine to gloss over it for now but revisiting it could be useful

We know someone's existence is comprised of Memories, Soul, Mind, Body while names influence how your existence ultimately stabilises and can be changed seeing as Korne's axe had its will completely changed after being renamed and influenced by Korne's will

This reminds me.. Fate being overwritten by Shiro's magical energy is... kind of similar to this because her existence was being rewritten.
 
Btw Kaito's SI being so unpredictable thay it can change events is kind of crazy

Well... alice can predict nearly any possibility (almost 10^128 if you count her chess game) and even possibilities which are close to non existant.

And yet she viewed Isis and Kuro as lost causes and believed their fates were ultimately a Bad End with no chance of getting better... and yet kaito managed to change it in a short amount of time.

If we take Kaito's 2nd encounter with Isis's magic power of death then Kaito's willpower overcoming the embodiment of Death Manip which causes Fear on a existential level is kind of crazy since he is doing it without any blessing protecting him and was almost breaking down yet still refusing to wield

Willpower seems to be important but not talked about as much in universe but thats another topic.

Well... anyways this means Kaito changing events from nigh impossible to possible and baffling Alice who couldn't even predict this (despite predicting nigh impossible scenarios) is really incredibly insane
 
Yea we could significantly improve his social influencing, add the stuff about him raising flags + making illness fall in love at first sight + making Rosemary like him + the myltiversal fan club, and this recent stuff.

I am too busy to do that myself though.
 
I was asked to post this

An epilogue does not occur after the story.
An epilogue occurs after the necessity of the story.
The distinction is crucial.
A narrative can continue.
Its necessity cannot.
The moment a narrative reaches an epilogue, every causal process responsible for its existence has already completed itself. Every conflict has already been resolved. Every possibility has already been exhausted. Every character has already become exactly what they were always going to become.
The story has ceased generating itself.
What remains is merely the recognition of that fact.
This is where True Epilogue enters.
Unlike a conventional epilogue, which merely follows a narrative, True Epilogue follows the possibility of narrative itself.
The story is over.
The potential for stories is over.
The distinction between before and after is over.
The distinction between beginning and ending is over.
And most importantly:
The distinction between "existence" and "having existed" is over.
At this point, some of you may object.
"But isn't that just nonexistence?"
No.
Because nonexistence is still defined relative to existence.
True Epilogue arrives after that distinction has already lost meaning.
True Epilogue is what remains after even those descriptions become impossible.
And narrative identity is precisely what True Epilogue occurs after.
The result is that any attempt to quantify True Epilogue immediately collapses.
Dimensions fail.
Layers fail.
Outerversal structures fail.
Meta-narratives fail.
Author entities fail.
Readers fail.
Powerscalers fail.
The CRT moderator reading this fails.
The concept of acceptance and rejection becomes a subordinate manifestation of the Epilogue itself.
Therefore:
True Epilogue is not Tier 0 because it transcends Tier 0.
True Epilogue is Tier 0 because Tier 0 is merely the final surviving linguistic approximation available to entities that have not yet reached the Epilogue.
In conclusion:
The verse is Tier 0.
The readers are Tier 0.
The thread is Tier 0.
 
I was asked to post this

An epilogue does not occur after the story.
An epilogue occurs after the necessity of the story.
The distinction is crucial.
A narrative can continue.
Its necessity cannot.
The moment a narrative reaches an epilogue, every causal process responsible for its existence has already completed itself. Every conflict has already been resolved. Every possibility has already been exhausted. Every character has already become exactly what they were always going to become.
The story has ceased generating itself.
What remains is merely the recognition of that fact.
This is where True Epilogue enters.
Unlike a conventional epilogue, which merely follows a narrative, True Epilogue follows the possibility of narrative itself.
The story is over.
The potential for stories is over.
The distinction between before and after is over.
The distinction between beginning and ending is over.
And most importantly:
The distinction between "existence" and "having existed" is over.
At this point, some of you may object.
"But isn't that just nonexistence?"
No.
Because nonexistence is still defined relative to existence.
True Epilogue arrives after that distinction has already lost meaning.
True Epilogue is what remains after even those descriptions become impossible.
And narrative identity is precisely what True Epilogue occurs after.
The result is that any attempt to quantify True Epilogue immediately collapses.
Dimensions fail.
Layers fail.
Outerversal structures fail.
Meta-narratives fail.
Author entities fail.
Readers fail.
Powerscalers fail.
The CRT moderator reading this fails.
The concept of acceptance and rejection becomes a subordinate manifestation of the Epilogue itself.
Therefore:
True Epilogue is not Tier 0 because it transcends Tier 0.
True Epilogue is Tier 0 because Tier 0 is merely the final surviving linguistic approximation available to entities that have not yet reached the Epilogue.
In conclusion:
The verse is Tier 0.
The readers are Tier 0.
The thread is Tier 0.
Agree, super blatant
 
I was asked to post this

An epilogue does not occur after the story.
An epilogue occurs after the necessity of the story.
The distinction is crucial.
A narrative can continue.
Its necessity cannot.
The moment a narrative reaches an epilogue, every causal process responsible for its existence has already completed itself. Every conflict has already been resolved. Every possibility has already been exhausted. Every character has already become exactly what they were always going to become.
The story has ceased generating itself.
What remains is merely the recognition of that fact.
This is where True Epilogue enters.
Unlike a conventional epilogue, which merely follows a narrative, True Epilogue follows the possibility of narrative itself.
The story is over.
The potential for stories is over.
The distinction between before and after is over.
The distinction between beginning and ending is over.
And most importantly:
The distinction between "existence" and "having existed" is over.
At this point, some of you may object.
"But isn't that just nonexistence?"
No.
Because nonexistence is still defined relative to existence.
True Epilogue arrives after that distinction has already lost meaning.
True Epilogue is what remains after even those descriptions become impossible.
And narrative identity is precisely what True Epilogue occurs after.
The result is that any attempt to quantify True Epilogue immediately collapses.
Dimensions fail.
Layers fail.
Outerversal structures fail.
Meta-narratives fail.
Author entities fail.
Readers fail.
Powerscalers fail.
The CRT moderator reading this fails.
The concept of acceptance and rejection becomes a subordinate manifestation of the Epilogue itself.
Therefore:
True Epilogue is not Tier 0 because it transcends Tier 0.
True Epilogue is Tier 0 because Tier 0 is merely the final surviving linguistic approximation available to entities that have not yet reached the Epilogue.
In conclusion:
The verse is Tier 0.
The readers are Tier 0.
The thread is Tier 0.
looks good
 
Back
Top