- 2,805
- 3,413
Ladies and Gentlemen, we reached Elimination Rounds of VAL
Previous Threads:
vsbattles.com
vsbattles.com
Group Stage was full of tension, drama, action. And this is how our characters finished in table
Top 8 → directly to Round of 16
9–24 → playoffs (fight for Round of 16)
25–36 → eliminated
Now for rules that should be discussed, with enough votes, suggestions, we can revise, extend, axe them
Quantity/Quality Goals:
Mainly comes from this
Instead of writing Dante won against Vergil
Extend it to something like that
Dante won against Vergil in DMC3;
- Who previously effortestly kicked his ass
So it would give you even more contribution than just "+2" from one statement. But do note: don't make full respect thread of one character, because we don't know how that is relevant to your player. Only note important parts or arguments that is relevant to original one.
In another hand @DavidTPPM gave us good critique; "If quantity alone enough, why user can't spam panels and arts to win match"
Which was basically whole Doctor Doom vs Dante match. Isn't it unfair if someone puts effort to "glaze" while other just puts cool art and gets same point? So my own suggestion would be
In another words @Eseseso you can't win points by complitation of "moments"
Tackling Moments
Glazing is one job, but can you cancel moments? Yes I assume.
One of the funniest moments in DMC match was my friend @Random-Helper323 glazing Dante vs Urizen first fight. And funniest thing about that was if you knew DMC5 you could cancel all that moments by telling "Didn't Dante get one-shot?". This is what we call "Tackling of Arguments". With this example alone you can prevent your opponent to outscore you "+n" points. This obviously doesn't give you advantage, but in race where you both fight, it is important to not only leading, but preventing your rival to dominate you.
Which is why there are two ways to cancel wanks;
1. Tackling existing argument
2. Bringing anti-feat or negative aura moment; it can extend from -1 to n score for opponent; But do note: slandering character would need knowledge to some degree of character, because defeating "anti-feat" would grant opponent not only cancelling "- points" but giving +2 advantage for each cancelling.
Knock-Out Itself
By default, all recovery and cooldown of reusing arguments is cancelled when KO starts. However we can rewrite it, if you want
1. Knock-Out itself in UCL usually goes in Two Sets; Two Matches are played until Final itself, and winner is decided by Aggregate Score; This can bring some "comeback" tension, but well we might settle some "recovery rules" for this
2. Matches are decided in one set. Meaning; No Away and Home matches, if you lose you are eliminated from tournament, this would speedrun tournament, and we can just unrestict whole "cooldown, recovery arguments" to keep up tensions in every match.
What about Appelation?
If individuals think match was unfairly judged, or were biased, they can give appelation. In that case match will be replayed under another judge.
Btw all rules, and everything can be discussed there. So you guys give ideas, proposals, we together will decide. Obviously some of users will like some idea, while others dislike it.
Most Important Part:
We will make draw now with my right hand LARPGpt;
Previous Threads:
UNOFFICIAL VSBW AURA FARMING TOURNAMENT !
We’re introducing a tournament inspired by the UEFA Champions League — but instead of football, this is pure aura competition. Characters face off in matches where the only thing that matters is who delivers the better aura moments. No scaling. No shortcuts. Just arguments. At the end, only...
Aura Farming Tournament Announcement
Follow up to this thread https://vsbattles.com/threads/unofficial-vsbw-aura-farming-tournament.189361/ RankCharacterMatches PlayedWinsDrawsLossesGoalsGoal DifferencePoints 1Dante Sparda110010103 2Kratos110010103 3Kevin Kaslana110010103 4Ryuga1100993 5Albert Wesker1100773 6Jotaro Kujo1100773...
Group Stage was full of tension, drama, action. And this is how our characters finished in table
Top 8 → directly to Round of 16
9–24 → playoffs (fight for Round of 16)
25–36 → eliminated
Knockout Stage Drawing:
9th/10th place play against 23rd/24th place (round of 16 opponents are 7th/8thplace).
11th/12th place play against 21st/22nd place (round of 16 opponents are 5th/6thplace).
13th/14th place play against 19th/20th place (round of 16 opponents are 3rd/4thplace).
15th/16th place play against 17th/18th place (round of 16 opponents are 1st/2ndplace).
Draw would be based on what will randomizer choose first. For example let's take example Set A where 9th and 10th character exist. If we take 9th first it will go to Silver Top(Left), and 10th to Blue Top. Same goes for 23rd/24th. If we get 23rd first it goes to Silver, and 24th to Blue. Meaning: 9th will face with 23rd and 24th with 10th.
To visualize let's use image of UEFA
Left: Silver Top, Right: Blue Top. And same thing will be for 1/8(Where we pick first 8 to either Silver or Blue)
To get more information just watch this videos(14:00 to 17:00) from UCL(9:30 to 12:14)
9th/10th place play against 23rd/24th place (round of 16 opponents are 7th/8thplace).
11th/12th place play against 21st/22nd place (round of 16 opponents are 5th/6thplace).
13th/14th place play against 19th/20th place (round of 16 opponents are 3rd/4thplace).
15th/16th place play against 17th/18th place (round of 16 opponents are 1st/2ndplace).
Draw would be based on what will randomizer choose first. For example let's take example Set A where 9th and 10th character exist. If we take 9th first it will go to Silver Top(Left), and 10th to Blue Top. Same goes for 23rd/24th. If we get 23rd first it goes to Silver, and 24th to Blue. Meaning: 9th will face with 23rd and 24th with 10th.
To visualize let's use image of UEFA
Left: Silver Top, Right: Blue Top. And same thing will be for 1/8(Where we pick first 8 to either Silver or Blue)
To get more information just watch this videos(14:00 to 17:00) from UCL(9:30 to 12:14)
Now for rules that should be discussed, with enough votes, suggestions, we can revise, extend, axe them
Quantity/Quality Goals:
Mainly comes from this
Now once we know, use this, there were ways to extend it generally. Due to knowing or lacking knowledge about certain character some of moments were given more points, while another ones were left just "+1". To prevent this; make respect thread or elaboration of individual. Example:
Instead of writing Dante won against Vergil
Extend it to something like that
Dante won against Vergil in DMC3;
- Who previously effortestly kicked his ass
- One of the iconic DMC characters alongside with Dante
- Main Antagonist of DMC3
- Generally considered main villain of DMC3
So it would give you even more contribution than just "+2" from one statement. But do note: don't make full respect thread of one character, because we don't know how that is relevant to your player. Only note important parts or arguments that is relevant to original one.
In another hand @DavidTPPM gave us good critique; "If quantity alone enough, why user can't spam panels and arts to win match"
Which was basically whole Doctor Doom vs Dante match. Isn't it unfair if someone puts effort to "glaze" while other just puts cool art and gets same point? So my own suggestion would be
In another words @Eseseso you can't win points by complitation of "moments"
Tackling Moments
Glazing is one job, but can you cancel moments? Yes I assume.
One of the funniest moments in DMC match was my friend @Random-Helper323 glazing Dante vs Urizen first fight. And funniest thing about that was if you knew DMC5 you could cancel all that moments by telling "Didn't Dante get one-shot?". This is what we call "Tackling of Arguments". With this example alone you can prevent your opponent to outscore you "+n" points. This obviously doesn't give you advantage, but in race where you both fight, it is important to not only leading, but preventing your rival to dominate you.
Which is why there are two ways to cancel wanks;
1. Tackling existing argument
2. Bringing anti-feat or negative aura moment; it can extend from -1 to n score for opponent; But do note: slandering character would need knowledge to some degree of character, because defeating "anti-feat" would grant opponent not only cancelling "- points" but giving +2 advantage for each cancelling.
Knock-Out Itself
By default, all recovery and cooldown of reusing arguments is cancelled when KO starts. However we can rewrite it, if you want
1. Knock-Out itself in UCL usually goes in Two Sets; Two Matches are played until Final itself, and winner is decided by Aggregate Score; This can bring some "comeback" tension, but well we might settle some "recovery rules" for this
2. Matches are decided in one set. Meaning; No Away and Home matches, if you lose you are eliminated from tournament, this would speedrun tournament, and we can just unrestict whole "cooldown, recovery arguments" to keep up tensions in every match.
What about Appelation?
If individuals think match was unfairly judged, or were biased, they can give appelation. In that case match will be replayed under another judge.
Btw all rules, and everything can be discussed there. So you guys give ideas, proposals, we together will decide. Obviously some of users will like some idea, while others dislike it.
Most Important Part:
We will make draw now with my right hand LARPGpt;
