Just a brief clarification that this is not what I said. I intended to refer to Trump's self-stated intentions to bomb Iran back to the stone age for fun, not that he has personally committed genocide already. Although there is also the Gaza issue, which a large majority of experts have classified as a genocide.
Well, in my mind the 'Would LOVE to have my fun with you' after asking for the other socials at the least does sound very threatening in nature.
I think it's more likely a threat of harassment. I don't deny that. But I am more willing to extend the benefit of leniency when its A. not very explicit and B. a response to a staff member pressing a controversial matter in discussion.
Have they been notified that they've been reported here? I think hearing from them at all might help us decide where we lean exactly.
I've already responded to that when he brought it up. In a previous comment I have told him that I'd love to discuss the politics on a more appropriate platform ( For example Discord. ) given how this site is not the place for it, because I started finding the debate fun.
Get well soon, wish you all the best!Nevertheless, I apologise to our community for my own unfiltered behaviour recently. I am currently in a stressed out mood in general.
That's sort of what I thought, and I don't necessarily blame you for getting a little dramatic when Ant was and literally still is calling you evil and conscience-deprived. I'd still support simply moving on then.
I do empathize with you being stressed out, and I definitely understand how the state of the US can be extremely divisive and depressing- but Ant I'd reiterate that we have rules against politics for a reason, and I find it highly inappropriate to continue to drag out this disagreement here.Nevertheless, I apologise to our community for my own unfiltered behaviour recently. I am currently in a stressed out mood in general.
Sure, that's perfectly reasonable, and I agree. Let us all simply wait for further staff evaluation on the circumstance.but don't want any more provocative comments from Slav here either.
This guy uploaded another CRT again..LOOK, HE UPLOADED AGAIN.
I think the passive life manipulation in Asmoday’s profile should either be changed to corruption, or corruption should be added.
I believe the explanation for Passive Life Manipulation (Passively turn all life/existence to be rendered unstable. should either be replaced with: Corrosion Inducement Biological Manipulation Corruption Or for those abilities should be added as passive effects of her cubes. The...vsbattles.com
Please, i beg you, to restrict this guy from making any threads and delete all of his threads, really, cause this is so annoying. He clearly doesn't know anything's works.
Yeah, I suppose there's not much choice if they literally won't listen otherwise.I suppose that we will likely have to give them a temporary warning ban then.
There's a dedicated thread to report vandalisms
This guy is a troll, he's been doing the same edit and reverting it for weeks.
Very sorry to hear, but mods are also keeping an eye on the thread dedicated solely for reporting that
Apologies, I replied to the wrong person.
no problem at all
Sorry if i offended you that’s mb you did came a bit agressive tho to the point where other members asked you to chill out.I want to report both @Makai641001 and @Cursed_Copycat for their replies here
Issues with Seven Deadly Sins 4-B rating
Introduction The Seven Deadly Sins verse is currently rated at Solar System level, but this rating rests on a single outlier feat rather than any consistent display of power throughout the series. The verse has no Universal Energy System, meaning there's no in-universe framework that would...
Makai is literally stonewalling everyone, replying to everyone within less than 2 or 3 minutes to just clutter the thread, and also saying things like “you’re slow” or “you’re funny ngl” and making more ironic comments
Cursed on the other hand is doing the same but saying things like “this is such a low iq debunk” for something that’s as obvious as a blue sky.
Which is why I stopped replying and also because it wasn’t going anywhere.
I didn’t dodge anything, I stopped replying cause the thread was getting heated and there was no point in doing so for the moment, considering you kept repeating the same points over and over again without any substance.
We brought up New uncontested evidence about Cath channeling it’s entire Chaos Power inside a shield.
They instantly agreed before supporters could Even argue about it.
Again, nothing there is new. @KingTempest asked you questions about, actually very simple questions and you completely stonewalled him. He asked his questions and 3 minutes later you reply with absolutely nothing new, nothing of substance, because you're not taking it seriously and are not taking your time to think properly on how to answer his questions.
Besides the point, which is the fact that you're not taking anything seriously. Every time someone replies, you instantly reply to them. Your first reply to me had this:
You just nuh uh'd me, you did that with Tempest, as well as @Digital_Franz. And you did that a lot of times.
Are you serious? You report me after repeatedly cussing people out, when I gave you COUNTER ARGUMENTS? Genuinely how old are you.I want to report both @Makai641001 and @Cursed_Copycat for their replies here
Issues with Seven Deadly Sins 4-B rating
Introduction The Seven Deadly Sins verse is currently rated at Solar System level, but this rating rests on a single outlier feat rather than any consistent display of power throughout the series. The verse has no Universal Energy System, meaning there's no in-universe framework that would...
Makai is literally stonewalling everyone, replying to everyone within less than 2 or 3 minutes to just clutter the thread, and also saying things like “you’re slow” or “you’re funny ngl” and making more ironic comments
Cursed on the other hand is doing the same but saying things like “this is such a low iq debunk” for something that’s as obvious as a blue sky.
I told Makai once to "hop off". Stop lying for no reason.
I wasn’t offended by that btw but Both sides have their wrongs i’m sorry about what I Said that offended you
Nah bruh, half of your mentions having you hitting the “*******” swearing censors. You’re literally cussing people out then got offended when I called you out for that.
I can swear as much as I want as long as I don't try to bypass the filter and it's not directed to someone else, which was my case. I was saying "******* character" or just "****". I'm not entertaining this anymore. We're not supposed to.
You were the first one to be aggressive, in the way you're reporting Cursed for ("Honestly this is such an ass debunk, I can't believe you'd waste time writing it"). You are a staff member, and no matter how widely agreed upon something is, it falls to you to make an even greater effort to follow the rules. To me, it reads like you really didn't make an effort at all, here. You took every opportunity to denigrate and accuse the supporters of this verse. Even though I agree with the sentiments of your OP (without looking through the evidence too much), I think your behavior in this thread was demonstrably worse than either of the two you've reported. Being right cannot allow users to be rude. It simply cannot be.I want to report both @Makai641001 and @Cursed_Copycat for their replies here
Issues with Seven Deadly Sins 4-B rating
Introduction The Seven Deadly Sins verse is currently rated at Solar System level, but this rating rests on a single outlier feat rather than any consistent display of power throughout the series. The verse has no Universal Energy System, meaning there's no in-universe framework that would...
Makai is literally stonewalling everyone, replying to everyone within less than 2 or 3 minutes to just clutter the thread, and also saying things like “you’re slow” or “you’re funny ngl” and making more ironic comments
Cursed on the other hand is doing the same but saying things like “this is such a low iq debunk” for something that’s as obvious as a blue sky.
I cannot decide that. Only HR can, if someone wished to litigate the issue. But I do think your behavior is worse than the other two you're reporting, which dampens the severity of their actions: people acting aggressive in response to a staff member acting aggressive is a bit more understandable than just acting aggressive out of nowhere.
This I disagree with, I think you’re exaggerating since I did not attack the person but the argument, might still be unnecessary sure, but not worse than them. But I don’t mind that to dispute it, actions were taken in the end of the day, and the thread is now under control, even though it’s not the outcome I wanted (which is being staff only).
And this I think it’s just giving them an excuse for their behavior. When was Cursed’s first comment? Like page 5? 6? He didn’t even quote my rather ignorant comment, he quoted a regular comment of mine and said “low iq debunk”, he actually started that.
