• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

What is the criteria for logic manip?

Mbpoops

He/Him
Messages
8,389
Reaction score
7,550
How do you aquire logic manip? I heard its from messing with deductive reasoning but how do you even prove that?
 
That the neat part, you can't, either straight-forward statement and feat, or nothing
 
Even if you get namedrop logic in the verse, you do not get the ability unless you have another follow up statement about direct deductive reasoning, or straight-forward feat like Maou Gakuin verse
 
Even if you get namedrop logic in the verse, you do not get the ability unless you have another follow up statement about direct deductive reasoning, or straight-forward feat like Maou Gakuin verse
Does it have to specifically be stated that they change deductive reasoning or is there more to it
 
Does it have to specifically be stated that they change deductive reasoning or is there more to it
Explicitly violate 1/3 laws of thought (classical logic) and allowing contradictions (non-classical logic) to happen because of said Logic Manipulation
 
Does it have to specifically be stated that they change deductive reasoning or is there more to it
As long as it have thing to do with deductive reasoning then it is oke, alter it, delete it, create it
 
As long as it have thing to do with deductive reasoning then it is oke, alter it, delete it, create it
Would it be Logic Manipulation if it allowed allowing contradictions such as "instant of eternity" and "the start of the end" to occur?
 
Would it be Logic Manipulation if it allowed allowing contradictions such as "instant of eternity" and "the start of the end" to occur?
It must be logical contradiction, shit that violate deductive reasoning, not some contradiction shit like day and night at the same time. I literally didn't get logic hax despite the logic is the ground for causal paradox, paradox is contradiction, so you need a very explicit shit
 
Back
Top