• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Wiki Page Deletion Requests Thread (New forum)

Jinx666 said:
Proposing =/= Deciding it will happen. And no, I havent got an obligation to do that. You can ask them if you want.

Because it is pretty obvious... Theres no talk about the verse, no calcs, its been like this for years. Nothing is being done (And i'm not gonna be looking deeply into a show for preschoolers). And like i said, it'd be way easier to just remake the pages to the modern format should anyone want to. Its not like anything of value is getting deleted here.

And like i mentioned before, im not proposing it gets deleted just for lacking scans or references. Thats just one showing of a lack of redeeming quality. The Tiering of the page itself are guestimates with no actual backing, and the verse is abandoned. It feels more like false advertising to make a verse page for one singular, heavily outdated profile with no followup for years.
Click to expand...
If the tiering is outdated or unsupported, that’s something that can be addressed through revisions or CRTs, not deletion.

If you’re proposing deletion, it’s important to first consult the supporters or people interested in the verse before taking that step, not after proposing it. Additionally, how can you be sure the pages were created as false advertising? That sounds more like an assumption, especially since you haven’t reached out to the verse’s supporters before making that kind of claim.

Overall, this seems like a case for fixing the page, not removing it.
 
Last time im replying about this until a staff member chips in. By all means, you're welcome to fix the page/verse if you want to.

A) You'd need an active community and someone willing to do said CRT. Thats not gonna be me, or seemingly anyone else. Remaking the profile is much easier to do as well. Theres no salvage to this page/verse currently either (One of her Powers and Abilities is literally called 'Volcano Manipulation', theres no need to be this allergic to deleting pages that aren't a good look)
B) No, it isnt. If im proposing to delete a page/verse, its because of how outdated and unsupported it is (that excludes people who just simply 'like' the verse). If there were people actively supporting it, then I wouldn't be bringing this up in the first place. Supporters is more of a popularity section (which imo, the wiki has outgrown) as opposed to Knowledgable Members (people who directly claim they know the series and its scaling) so it doesnt signify anyone there can improve the verse necessarily.
C) Im not saying it was created to false advertise, only that theres no point making a verse page for a series that isn't actually being developed for one singular profile and no other external info (like calc-listing). Its falsely misleading to viewers.
 
Last edited:
Jinx666 said:
Last time im replying about this until a staff member chips in. By all means, you're welcome to fix the page/verse if you want to.

A) You'd need an active community and someone willing to do said CRT. Thats not gonna be me, or seemingly anyone else. Remaking the profile is much easier to do as well. Theres no salvage to this page/verse currently either (One of her Powers and Abilities is literally called 'Volcano Manipulation', theres no need to be this allergic to deleting pages that aren't a good look)
B) No, it isnt. If im proposing to delete a page/verse, its because of how outdated and unsupported it is (that excludes people who just simply 'like' the verse). If there were people actively supporting it, then I wouldn't be bringing this up in the first place. Supporters is more of a popularity section (which imo, the wiki has outgrown) as opposed to Knowledgable Members (people who directly claim they know the series and its scaling) so it doesnt signify anyone there can improve the verse necessarily.
C) Im not saying it was created to false advertise, only that theres no point making a verse page for a series that isn't actually being developed for one singular profile and no other external info (like calc-listing). Its falsely misleading to viewers.
Click to expand...
I’ll leave the final decision on the pages to staff, but I’d like to clarify a few points:
A) A single incorrect ability isn’t enough reason to delete entire profiles.
B) My main point is that supporters should be notified beforehand.
C) This is more of a cleanup issue than a deletion one.
 
Jinx666 said:
C) Im not saying it was created to false advertise, only that theres no point making a verse page for a series that isn't actually being developed for one singular profile and no other external info (like calc-listing). Its falsely misleading to viewers.
Click to expand...
The page was created following Ant’s request to separate Disney verses into different pages, so that point seems mistaken.

Antvasima said:
What do other staff members here think? 🙏
Click to expand...
I agree that the page should be deleted, but I think you should contact the Princess Lani's profile creator so they can at least save the code from both pages in a sandbox, so they can recreate them when they're able to.
 
Apex_Predator_GX said:
The page was created following Ant’s request to separate Disney verses into different pages, so that point seems mistaken.
Click to expand...
It was created back in 2015. How do you remember that far about minute details?
Apex_Predator_GX said:
I agree that the page should be deleted, but I think you should contact the Princess Lani's profile creator so they can at least save the code from both pages in a sandbox, so they can recreate them when they're able to.
Click to expand...
It seems like @OishiLover75 created it, and they haven't visited this forum for many years. 🙏
 
Okay. Are you willing to handle it please? 🙏
 
Jinx666 said:
Came across this profile


No justifications, only member of its verse (other than the verse page), barebones, no one seemingly willing to rework

If that can be deleted, then the whole verse page could also go: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Sofia_the_First
Theres quite a lot of supporters, but no traction for the verse as a whole. Don't see any reason to keep it
Click to expand...
@Bobsican @EMagoIorSouI @Starter_Pack @Sans2345 @Alien_Dual_Blaster @The_Impress @MrKerf @Ican'tthinkof1goodname @The_Fiend888

Hello, sorry for the ping, just saw your names on the supporters page.

Are any of you willing to help regarding this issue?
 
Just a Random Butler said:
@Bobsican @EMagoIorSouI @Starter_Pack @Sans2345 @Alien_Dual_Blaster @The_Impress @MrKerf @Ican'tthinkof1goodname @The_Fiend888

Hello, sorry for the ping, just saw your names on the supporters page.

Are any of you willing to help regarding this issue?
Click to expand...
I don't see myself in the history of the page, which means I was probably added there as its Disney, and I am on Disney page as a supporter. From the looks of it, everyone else is in the same boat. I have never seen Sofia in my life.
 
Same as the above, TBH it probably should be a rule to not just inherit supporters from a wider verse to a specific one, but that's a whole other topic of its own.
 
Antvasima said:
It was created back in 2015. How do you remember that far about minute details?
Click to expand...
You’d be surprised how good my memory is, but that message was directed at Jinx666, who was referring to the page about the Sofia the First verse page.

Antvasima said:
It seems like @OishiLover75 created it, and they haven't visited this forum for many years. 🙏
Click to expand...
And judging by his contributions, his last edit on the wiki was exactly a year ago.


So I moved both pages to a sandbox where anyone can copy and paste them if they’re interested in reworking them.


I think both pages can be deleted now.
 
I mean if theres other disney verse pages for a single barebones profile (I havent checked) its probably worth getting rid of them too?
Unless theres stuff like associated calcs to scale (and even then its better to have verse pages have a minimum of 2 pages), not much point to them being there (and can be easily remade if need be)

Can only see https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Mary_Poppins_(Disney) at a glance?
 
Jinx666 said:
I mean if theres other disney verse pages for a single barebones profile (I havent checked) its probably worth getting rid of them too?
Unless theres stuff like associated calcs to scale (and even then its better to have verse pages have a minimum of 2 pages), not much point to them being there (and can be easily remade if need be)

Can only see https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Mary_Poppins_(Disney) at a glance?
Click to expand...
I don’t have strong feelings about deleting the pages either, especially if they’re just barebones with no active supporters or meaningful content. In that case, I agree it may be better to remove them or keep them in sandboxes instead, since they can always be recreated properly if needed later.
 
Jinx666 said:
I mean if theres other disney verse pages for a single barebones profile (I havent checked) its probably worth getting rid of them too?
Unless theres stuff like associated calcs to scale (and even then its better to have verse pages have a minimum of 2 pages), not much point to them being there (and can be easily remade if need be)

Can only see https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Mary_Poppins_(Disney) at a glance?
Click to expand...
The standards for verse pages state that they only need one profile, and Disney Mary Poppins actually includes a list of her hax abilities in the feats section. So even if the profile looks a bit bare at first glance, it does have enough content to support her powers and tier.
 
The profile is still incredibly bare, outdated and hardly justified at all. Not deletion worthy imo, but it doesnt justify an entire verse page, especially when all it has to offer in the Power of the Verse section is "This verse has Human level characters".
EDIT: Well...until Apex just added a bunch to it just now that is. Dont know how much that counts to a meaningful revamp but eh

I dont see where it says that it only requires one profile. Even if it does, that shouldnt be the case (No point talking about a 'verse' if theres only gonna be one associated profile and not exploring any other facets of the verse. Theres no such thing as a catalogue with only one option. Its completely fine to have standalone profiles).
At most. the minimum requirement for a verse page with only one profile (if theres no plans to make others) should probably be having linked calculations.
 
Last edited:
Jinx666 said:
The profile is still incredibly bare, outdated and hardly justified at all. Not deletion worthy imo, but it doesnt justify an entire verse page, especially when all it has to offer in the Power of the Verse section is "This verse has Human level characters".
EDIT: Well...until Apex just added a bunch to it just now that is. Dont know how much that counts to a meaningful revamp but eh

I dont see where it says that it only requires one profile. Even if it does, that shouldnt be the case (No point talking about a 'verse' if theres only gonna be one associated profile and not exploring any other facets of the verse. Theres no such thing as a catalogue with only one option. Its completely fine to have standalone profiles).
At most. the minimum requirement for a verse page with only one profile (if theres no plans to make others) should probably be having linked calculations.
Click to expand...
Yes, the rules only require one profile, and since we’re talking about Disney, there are likely other Mary Poppins incarnations that could receive profiles as well.
 
Ztesrxgdfjcvgkbh said:
Yes, the rules only require one profile
Click to expand...
Source?

EDIT: Nvm found a thread on it and turns out its in contention. Still doesnt seem to be properly concluded or written on any official pages either way

Minimum should definitely be 2 pages either way (if theres no external content like calculations, or even potential to make more pages within the verse). Verse pages are mainly used as cataloguing to talk about a franchise in itself. Theres no point if all the content is solely focused on one profile, and hasnt got anything else going for it

Not that this has bearing on the Sofia the First one, cause if its only underdeveloped page is getting axed then so should the verse.
 
Last edited:
Jinx666 said:
Source?

EDIT: Nvm found a thread on it and turns out its in contention. Still doesnt seem to be properly concluded or written on any official pages either way

Minimum should definitely be 2 pages either way (if theres no external content like calculations, or even potential to make more pages within the verse). Verse pages are mainly used as cataloguing to talk about a franchise in itself. Theres no point if all the content is solely focused on one profile, and hasnt got anything else going for it

Not that this has bearing on the Sofia the First one, cause if its only underdeveloped page is getting axed then so should the verse.
Click to expand...
If you’re referring to that old thread where Apex participated, let me inform you that it was mostly rejected by the staff members.
 
Idk how many threads this stuff had, but if we're making verse pages based on a single profile, then the profile should at least have some sort of quality.
 
Jinx666 said:
Minimum should definitely be 2 pages either way (if theres no external content like calculations, or even potential to make more pages within the verse). Verse pages are mainly used as cataloguing to talk about a franchise in itself. Theres no point if all the content is solely focused on one profile, and hasnt got anything else going for it
Click to expand...
Verse pages for one single movie installment should not exist at all.
 
Blank page.
Edit: Mr. Bambu handled it. Thank you.
vsbattles.fandom.com

Dabura Karaba

Dabura Karaba (ダブラ・カラバ Dabura Karaba) or simply Dabura, is the primary antagonist of the Jujutsu Kaisen Modulo series. He is a Simurian warrior of Deskunte who left Simuria with the Rumelians to save his younger sister and fulfill his best friend's last wish. Tier: 7-C Name: Dabura Karaba...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
 
Last edited:
MaskedDragon908 said:
Blank page.
vsbattles.fandom.com

Dabura Karaba

Dabura Karaba (ダブラ・カラバ Dabura Karaba) or simply Dabura, is the primary antagonist of the Jujutsu Kaisen Modulo series. He is a Simurian warrior of Deskunte who left Simuria with the Rumelians to save his younger sister and fulfill his best friend's last wish. Tier: 7-C Name: Dabura Karaba...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
Click to expand...
A lot of pages of characters in the jjk verse page are blank actually
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

DarkDragonMedeus
Standardization of Tabber Image Formatting
Replies
12
Views
1K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Jinx666
'Affiliations' addition (optional) to Character pages
Replies
20
Views
2K
Jinx666
Jinx666
Agnaa
Standard Format - Statistics Section Tabbers
Replies
19
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Just a Random Butler
  • Locked
Proposed Quality of Life Change to the Discussions Template
Replies
31
Views
3K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Poiesis_Element
Mortal Shell Verse Creation
Replies
20
Views
2K
Poiesis_Element
Poiesis_Element
Back
Top