- 8,689
- 3,160
Of course, that's for the God-Tiers like the Shades, Bina and those who scale to them.I do not see anyone getting it other than bina, shades and maybe soveriegn's.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course, that's for the God-Tiers like the Shades, Bina and those who scale to them.I do not see anyone getting it other than bina, shades and maybe soveriegn's.
Don't care. I hate 4A just because "wow there a light, that means its a star"I do not see anyone getting it other than bina, shades and maybe soveriegn's.
I mean, that's just Argument from Belief, isn't it?Don't care. I hate 4A just because "wow there a light, that means its a star"
What u all had been since IT dropI mean, that's just Argument from Belief, isn't it?
I mean, not really. The visuals is obviously a starry sky and even have mentioned that its a starry sky. There's no reason to believe that's just mere a lights, unless there's an evidence that says so.What u all had been since IT drop
it would be the contrary, since what u stating is proving a negativeThere's no reason to believe that's just mere a lights, unless there's an evidence that says so.
When i said "There’s no reason to assume they are just lights without evidence."it would be the contrary, since what u stating is proving a negative
Not really, he's true because again we can't prove whether those stars are real or fake especially if it was embedded within False SkyWhen i said "There’s no reason to assume they are just lights without evidence."
That’s not a claim about what they aren’t, it’s a challenge to an unsupported assertion.
The burden is on you when you claim "That's just light" because that's a positive claim, which requires evidence. So without evidence, there’s no reason to default to that interpretation
That would be absolute non-sequitur.we can't prove whether those stars are real or fake especially if it was embedded within False Sky
Why would it be? Unless there's evidence those stars are real, Puppet just used an analogy with the entire light thing cause the stars are fakeThat would be absolute non-sequitur.
Because it's independent from the false sky? If you making a premise like "All dimensions we've been through has fake celestial bodies" then you claim "therefore all dimensions that has celestial bodies in the future are fake too." That's clearly non-sequitur and it was never been a universal rules in here.Why would it be? Unless there's evidence those stars are real, Puppet just used an analogy with the entire light thing cause the stars are fake
All types of pocket dimension so far had been independent of false sky, yet all falseBecause it's independent from the false sky?
Mona even said the false sky contained real stars, light-years apart , and those that fell into Teyvat were only fragments and parts of constellations, not their full forms.Because it's independent from the false sky? If you making a premise like "All dimensions we've been through has fake celestial bodies" then you claim "therefore all dimensions that has celestial bodies in the future are fake too." That's clearly non-sequitur and it was never been a universal rules in here.
Yet have their own reasons why they're fake.All types of pocket dimension so far had been independent of false sky, yet all false
Visual evidence defaults to the most consistent interpretation, unless they're proven otherwise.So could u actually prove this time fr they are real and not 5 chirstmas lights?
The link says "part of a constellation," not part of a star. If you know that constellations are clusters of stars, then no, for that structure to be so affected and for it to be said that a part fell, it must be something significantly large from one of the "stars."and those that fell into Teyvat were only fragments and parts of constellations, not their full forms.
Therefore, that why Skirk called the false sky a form of Primordial One romanticism toward the universe, because these stars were imitations of real stars, not necessarily unreal
There are moreFalse Sky = Obviously it's "False Sky"
Imaginarium Theater = It's a dimension within a book.
bro, it's called a shard.The link says "part of a constellation," not part of a star. If you know that constellations are clusters of stars, then no, for that structure to be so affected and for it to be said that a part fell, it must be something significantly large from one of the "stars."
Arle's one is an Illusion, Ei's one is just her consciousness, and Adepti's one was only from their mind. So u basically listed what i mean.There are more
Ahem, Arle's Moon, Ei's Moon, Adeptis Sun/Moons
Nep 2 frstars just have paraconsistent physiology because they are real and not real
fake and unreal are two different things.stars just have paraconsistent physiology because they are real and not real
This is for Asmoday, my friendNep 2 fr
so in the end they arent stars and therefore its unscalablefake and unreal are two different things.
No because that's fr not what I claimed, it's like saying if I agree with one of Puppet's point = I agree with all of his points which doesn't make sense especially if I'm the one getting jobbed for thisBecause it's independent from the false sky? If you making a premise like "All dimensions we've been through has fake celestial bodies" then you claim "therefore all dimensions that has celestial bodies in the future are fake too." That's clearly non-sequitur and it was never been a universal rules in here.
Yeah but there are statements that says they're fake and not real stars so statement > visual hereYet have their own reasons why they're fake.
False Sky = Obviously it's "False Sky"
Imaginarium Theater = It's a dimension within a book.
Visual evidence defaults to the most consistent interpretation, unless they're proven otherwise.
mona said its real? so?so in the end they arent stars and therefore its unscalable![]()
![]()
That's why i said if.No because that's fr not what I claimed, it's like saying if I agree with one of Puppet's point = I agree with all of his points which doesn't make sense especially if I'm the one getting jobbed for this![]()
Yeah but there are statements that says they're fake and not real stars so statement > visual here
Visual evidence defaults to the most consistent interpretation, unless they're proven otherwise
bro, it's called a shard.
With this definition (of the word shard) you can't establish a size for those fallen pieces, so you've really added little to the discussion
Adeptus one are actual domains we can visitAdepti's one was only from their mind.
THIS VERSE IS GONNA CAP AT HIGH 5Aso in the end they arent stars and therefore its unscalable![]()
![]()
Yeah, they came to be from their minds.Adeptus one are actual domains we can visit
![]()
Genshin Explained(1.4)Light Realm Energy
This is an explanation and summary of Light Realm energy. I took heavy inspiration from the Honkai Energy page in terms of formatting when making this. \--- The Light Realm is the primordial source of elemental energy, predating the Seven Elements, Celestia, and the current order. It is...vsbattles.com
Genshin Impact are 100% halal indeed
I thought it was a thread you'd started. It's a shame it wasn't.![]()
Genshin Explained(1.4)Light Realm Energy
This is an explanation and summary of Light Realm energy. I took heavy inspiration from the Honkai Energy page in terms of formatting when making this. \--- The Light Realm is the primordial source of elemental energy, predating the Seven Elements, Celestia, and the current order. It is...vsbattles.com
My thread would likely be for downgrading for verse and not upscale.I thought it was a thread you'd started. It's a shame it wasn't.
It would be a good idea to improve the low quality of many profiles. The traveller’s profile needs a lot of work on its keys.
6-B to Low 5-B to 5-B in the same key that the baseline is fr just country level Traveler unless specifically stated which Traveler is being used (like when I specific stated it was Eternal Moon's Marrow Traveler). This kind of formatting sucks lowkey because the best option would just to separate the keys for their amplification since the Traveler can't just amplify himself through Eternal Moon's Marrow or New Moon's Blessing in cross-verse fightsAt least Country level (Same as before. Briefly fought against Dottore who had stolen the power of the Three Moons, although he was not yet at full power), Small Planet level with the Eternal Moon's Marrow (The Traveler held the Eternal Moon's Marrow within them for some time, supposedly just like Arlecchino, who is stronger than before after gaining the Iridescent Moon's Marrow. Fought against Phanton Form Rerir and managed to make him run away. Able to keep up with an unserious 10% Rerir for a while, but is eventually overwhelmed. The Traveler is able to fight and hold off 10% power of Rerir who is serious and wants to kill him.), Planet level with the New Moon's Blessing (The Traveler fought onpar against Heretic of the False Moon God Dottore upon being blessed with the New Moon's Blessing by Columbina)